arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

On n-dependence

Published: 2014-11-01 | Updated: 2024-05-31
Comments: 22 pages; v.2: corrected a small issue in the published version of the paper, in the proof of (3) implies (2) of Theorem 5.4
Journal: Notre Dame J. Formal Logic, Volume 60, Number 2 (2019), 195-214

Abstract

In this note we develop and clarify some of the basic combinatorial properties of the new notion of $n$-dependence (for $1\leq n < ω$) recently introduced by Shelah. In the same way as dependence of a theory means its inability to encode a bipartite random graph with a definable edge relation, $n$-dependence corresponds to the inability to encode a random $(n+1)$-partite $(n+1)$-hypergraph with a definable edge relation. Most importantly, we characterize $n$-dependence by counting $\varphi$-types over finite sets (generalizing Sauer-Shelah lemma and answering a question of Shelah) and in terms of the collapse of random ordered $(n+1)$-hypergraph indiscernibles down to order-indiscernibles (which implies that the failure of $n$-dependence is always witnessed by a formula in a single free variable).

BibTeX

Loading...