arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

On the missing log in upper tail estimates

Published: 2016-12-27 | Updated: 2019-05-24
Comments: 31 pages; minor edits; to appear in Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B (JCTB)
Journal: Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series B 140 (2020), 98-146

Abstract

In the late 1990s, Kim and Vu pioneered an inductive method for showing concentration of certain random variables X. Shortly afterwards, Janson and Ruci{ń}ski developed an alternative inductive approach, which often gives comparable results for the upper tail Pr(X \ge (1+\eps) E[X]). In some cases, both methods yield upper tail estimates which are best possible up to a logarithmic factor in the exponent, but closing this narrow gap has remained a technical challenge. In this paper we present a BK-inequality based combinatorial sparsification idea that can recover this missing logarithmic term in the upper tail. As an illustration, we consider random subsets of the integers {1,...,n}, and prove sharp upper tail estimates for various objects of interest in additive combinatorics. Examples include the number of arithmetic progressions, Schur triples, additive quadruples, and (r,s)-sums.

BibTeX

Loading...