Free arrangements with low exponents

Stefan O. Tohaneanu

Published: 2017-07-22 | Updated: 2022-01-16

Comments: In sections 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 calculations were done by hand and there is no guarantee that we covered all possible cases. Proof of Prop 4.8, case (a) the conclusion that g=1 or h=1 is not justified: take the hyperplane arrangement with defining polynomial xy(x+y)(x+2y)(x+z)zw(z+w), with \ell=x+z

Note:

Publication:

hyperplane arrangement

# BIB PDF ARXIV

Abstract

In this article we show that any free hyperplane arrangement with exponents 1's and 2's is a supersolvable arrangement. We conjecture that any free arrangement with exponents 1's, 2's and exactly one 3, is also supersolvable, and we show this conjecture for hyperplane arrangements of ranks 4 and 5, and for inductively free arrangements of any rank.

arXiv++ Combinatorics

Free arrangements with low exponents

Abstract

BibTeX