arXiv++ Combinatorics

DAG models are statistical models satisfying a collection of conditional independence relations encoded by the nonedges of a directed acyclic graph (DAG) $\mathcal{G}$. Such models are used to model complex cause-effect systems across a variety of research fields. From observational data alone, a DAG model $\mathcal{G}$ is only recoverable up to Markov equivalence. Combinatorially, two DAGs are Markov equivalent if and only if they have the same underlying undirected graph (i.e. skeleton) and the same set of the induced subDAGs $i\to j \leftarrow k$, known as immoralities. Hence it is of interest to study the number and size of Markov equivalence classes (MECs). In a recent paper, the authors introduced a pair of generating functions that enumerate the number of MECs on a fixed skeleton by number of immoralities and by class size, and they studied the complexity of computing these functions. In this paper, we lay the foundation for studying these generating functions by analyzing their structure for trees and other closely related graphs. We describe these polynomials for some important families of graphs including paths, stars, cycles, spider graphs, caterpillars, and complete binary trees. In doing so, we recover important connections to independence polynomials, and extend some classical identities that hold for Fibonacci numbers. We also provide tight lower and upper bounds for the number and size of MECs on any tree. Finally, we use computational methods to show that the number and distribution of high degree nodes in a triangle-free graph dictates the number and size of MECs.

Two directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are called Markov equivalent if and only if they have the same underlying undirected graph (i.e. skeleton) and the same set of immoralities. Using observational data, a DAG model can only be determined up to Markov equivalence, and so it is desirable to understand the size and number of Markov equivalence classes (MECs) combinatorially. In this paper, we address this enumerative question using a pair of generating functions that encode the number and size of MECs on a skeleton $G$, and in doing so we connect this problem to classical problems in combinatorial optimization. The first is a graph polynomial that counts the number of MECs on $G$ by their number of immoralities. Using connections to the independent set problem, we show that computing a DAG on $G$ with the maximum possible number of immoralities is NP-hard. The second generating function counts the MECs on $G$ according to their size. Via computer enumeration, we show that this generating function is distinct for every connected graph on $p$ nodes for all $p\leq 10$.