Papers by Adrian She
2 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Chromatic Posets
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
In 1995 Stanley introduced the chromatic symmetric function $X_G$ of a graph $G$, whose $e$-positivity and Schur-positivity has been of large interest. In this paper we study the relative $e$-positivity and Schur-positivity between connected graphs on $n$ vertices. We define and investigate two families of posets on distinct chromatic symmetric functions. The relations depend on the $e$-positivity or Schur-positivity of a weighed subtraction between $X_G$ and $X_H$. We find a biconditional condition between $e$-positivity or Schur-positivity and the relation to the complete graph. This gives a new paradigm for $e$-positivity and for Schur-positivity. We show many other interesting properties of these posets including that trees form an independent set and are maximal elements. Additionally, we find that stars are independent elements, the independence number increases as we increase in the poset and that the family of lollipop graphs form a chain.
Schur and $e$-positivity of trees and cut vertices
We prove that the chromatic symmetric function of any $n$-vertex tree containing a vertex of degree $d\geq \log _2n +1$ is not $e$-positive, that is, not a positive linear combination of elementary symmetric functions. Generalizing this, we also prove that the chromatic symmetric function of any $n$-vertex connected graph containing a cut vertex whose deletion disconnects the graph into $d\geq\log _2n +1$ connected components is not $e$-positive. Furthermore we prove that any $n$-vertex bipartite graph, including all trees, containing a vertex of degree greater than $\lceil \frac{n}{2}\rceil$ is not Schur-positive, namely not a positive linear combination of Schur functions. In complete generality, we prove that if an $n$-vertex connected graph has no perfect matching (if $n$ is even) or no almost perfect matching (if $n$ is odd), then it is not $e$-positive. We hence deduce that many graphs containing the claw are not $e$-positive.