arXiv++ Combinatorics

A graph $G$ is perfect if $ω(H) = χ(H)$ for each induced subgraph $H$ of $G$. In 2002, Chudnovsky, Robertson, Seymour, and Thomas famously proved the Strong Perfect Graph Theorem. Motivated by this forbidden induced subgraph characterization of the class of perfect graphs as well as the possible extension of efficient algorithms on perfect graphs, we consider the structure of graphs that are almost perfect. We say a graph is $c$-apex perfect if there is a constant $c$ number of vertices such that, upon the deletion of these vertices, what remains is a perfect graph. In this paper, we characterize the class of the sets of graphs $\mathcal{H}$ with $|\mathcal{H}|\leq 2$ for which there exists $c \in \mathbb{N}$ with the property that each $\mathcal{H}$-free graph is $c$-apex perfect. We also extend these results to several notable subclasses of perfect graphs, including chordal, interval, split, bipartite, and complete multipartite graphs.

In this paper, we study fair division problems in which resources are structured as graphs and agents must receive connected bundles. This connectivity requirement fundamentally alters the problem, making it significantly more challenging than its classical counterpart. We focus on the fairness notion of $\mathrm{EF1}_{\mathrm{outer}}$, where envy can be eliminated by removing at most one vertex whose deletion does not disconnect the bundle -- a critical constraint for applications such as land division and network allocation. Our first result extends prior work by establishing the existence of $\mathrm{EF1}_{\mathrm{outer}}$ allocations for an infinite family of non-traceable graphs (that is, graphs that do not admit a Hamiltonian path), answering a central open question and generalizing Bilò et al.'s result for traceable graphs. We then make progress on a conjecture concerning the $\mathrm{EF1}_{\mathrm{outer}}$ spectrum of trees due to Chen and Zwicker. Finally, we complement our structural results with algorithmic insights, showing that deciding the existence of an $\mathrm{EF1}_{\mathrm{outer}}$ allocation is NP-complete even for binary additive valuations, thereby resolving an open complexity question. Taken together, our results deepen the connection between graph theory and fair division, and offer new tools for studying fairness in structured resource environments.

We study popular matchings in three classical settings: the house allocation problem, the marriage problem, and the roommates problem. In the popular matching problem, (a subset of) the vertices in a graph have preference orderings over their potential matches. A matching is popular if it gets a plurality of votes in a pairwise election against any other matching. Unfortunately, popular matchings typically do not exist. So we study a natural relaxation, namely popular winning sets which are a set of matchings that collectively get a plurality of votes in a pairwise election against any other matching. The $\textit{popular dimension}$ is the minimum cardinality of a popular winning set, in the worst case over the problem class. We prove that the popular dimension is exactly $2$ in the house allocation problem, even if the voters are weighted and ties are allowed in their preference lists. For the marriage problem and the roommates problem, we prove that the popular dimension is between $2$ and $3$, when the agents are weighted and/or their preferences orderings allow ties. In the special case where the agents are unweighted and have strict preference orderings, the popular dimension of the marriage problem is known to be exactly $1$ and we prove the popular dimension of the roommates problem is exactly $2$.

Let $K_7^{\vee}$ denote the graph obtained from the complete graph on seven vertices by deleting two edges with a common end. Motivated by Hadwiger's conjecture, we prove that every graph with no $K_7^{\vee}$-minor is $6$-colorable.