arXiv++ Combinatorics

A graph $G$ is perfect if $ω(H) = χ(H)$ for each induced subgraph $H$ of $G$. In 2002, Chudnovsky, Robertson, Seymour, and Thomas famously proved the Strong Perfect Graph Theorem. Motivated by this forbidden induced subgraph characterization of the class of perfect graphs as well as the possible extension of efficient algorithms on perfect graphs, we consider the structure of graphs that are almost perfect. We say a graph is $c$-apex perfect if there is a constant $c$ number of vertices such that, upon the deletion of these vertices, what remains is a perfect graph. In this paper, we characterize the class of the sets of graphs $\mathcal{H}$ with $|\mathcal{H}|\leq 2$ for which there exists $c \in \mathbb{N}$ with the property that each $\mathcal{H}$-free graph is $c$-apex perfect. We also extend these results to several notable subclasses of perfect graphs, including chordal, interval, split, bipartite, and complete multipartite graphs.

We show that for any nonnegative integer $r$, the Weighted Maximum List-$k$-Colourable Induced Subgraph problem can be solved in polynomial time for input graphs that do not contain $(P_5+ rK_1)$ as an induced subgraph, and give an explicit algorithm demonstrating this. This answers a question of Agrawal et al.\ (2024).

We study a two-player game played on undirected graphs called {\sc Trail Trap}, which is a variant of a game known as {\sc Partizan Edge Geography}. One player starts by choosing any edge and moving a token from one endpoint to the other; the other player then chooses a different edge and does the same. Alternating turns, each player moves their token along an unused edge from its current vertex to an adjacent vertex, until one player cannot move and loses. We present an algorithm to determine which player has a winning strategy when the graph is a tree and partially characterize the trees on which a given player wins. Additionally, we show that it is NP-hard to determine if Player~2 has a winning strategy on {\sc Trail Trap} from the starting position, even for connected bipartite planar graphs with maximum degree $4$. We determine which player has a winning strategy for certain subclasses of complete bipartite graphs and grid graphs, and we propose several open problems for further study.

Nordhaus and Gaddum proved in 1956 that the sum of the chromatic number $χ$ of a graph $G$ and its complement is at most $|G|+1$. The Nordhaus-Gaddum graphs are the class of graphs satisfying this inequality with equality, and are well-understood. In this paper we consider a hereditary generalization: graphs $G$ for which all induced subgraphs $H$ of $G$ satisfy $χ(H) + χ(\overline{H}) \le |H|$. We characterize the forbidden induced subgraphs of this class and find its intersection with a number of common classes, including line graphs. We also discuss $χ$-boundedness and algorithmic results.

A graph with degree sequence $π$ is a \emph{unigraph} if it is isomorphic to every graph that has degree sequence $π$. The class of unigraphs is not hereditary and in this paper we study the related hereditary class HCU, the hereditary closure of unigraphs, consisting of all graphs induced in a unigraph. We characterize the class HCU in multiple ways making use of the tools of a decomposition due to Tyshkevich and a partial order on degree sequences due to Rao. We also provide a new characterization of the class that consists of unigraphs for which all induced subgraphs are also unigraphs.

In this paper, we study split graphs and related classes of graphs from the perspective of their sequence of vertex degrees and an associated lattice under majorization. Following the work of Merris in 2003, we define blocks $[α(π)|β(π)]$, where $π$ is the degree sequence of a graph, and $α(π)$ and $β(π)$ are sequences arising from $π$. We use the block representation $[α(π)|β(π)]$ to characterize membership in each of the following classes: unbalanced split graphs, balanced split graphs, pseudo-split graphs, and three kinds of Nordhaus-Gaddum graphs (defined by Collins and Trenk in 2013). As in Merris' work, we form a poset under the relation majorization in which the elements are the blocks $[α(π)|β(π)]$ representing split graphs with a fixed number of edges. We partition this poset in several interesting ways using what we call amphoras, and prove upward and downward closure results for blocks arising from different families of graphs. Finally, we show that the poset becomes a lattice when a maximum and minimum element are added, and we prove properties of the meet and join of two blocks.