arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study the computational complexity of problems that ask if a given graph admits an edge-coloring that does not contain an edge-colored clique from some fixed finite family. We show that every such problem is poly-time equivalent to a Constraint Satisfaction Problem, yielding a P vs. NP-complete dichotomy. Our main contribution lies in the reduction from the CSP to the coloring problem where we apply methods from Ramsey theory and a novel notion of cut-homotopy.

We present a structural classification of constraint satisfaction problems (CSP) described by reflexive complete $2$-edge-coloured graphs. In particular, this classification extends the structural dichotomy for graph homomorphism problems known as the Hell--Nešetřil theorem (1990). Our classification is also efficient: we can check in polynomial time whether the CSP of a reflexive complete $2$-edge-coloured graph is in P or NP-complete, whereas for arbitrary $2$-edge-coloured graphs, this task is NP-complete. We then apply our main result in the context of matrix partition problems and sandwich problems. Firstly, we obtain one of the few algorithmic solutions to general classes of matrix partition problems. And secondly, we present a P vs. NP-complete classification of sandwich problems for matrix partitions.

An interval graph has interval count $\ell$ if it has an interval model, where among every $\ell+1$ intervals there are two that have the same length. Maximum Cut on interval graphs has been found to be NP-complete recently by Adhikary et al. while deciding its complexity on unit interval graphs (graphs with interval count one) remains a longstanding open problem. More recently, de Figueiredo et al. have made an advancement by showing that the problem remains NP-complete on interval graphs of interval count four. In this paper, we show that Maximum Cut is NP-complete even on interval graphs of interval count two.