arXiv++ Combinatorics

In this paper we compare the Katz similarity index to two other node similarity metrics, the standard distance and the resistance distance, for both path and cycle graphs. We consider how Katz similarity varies as the parameter $α$ and the size of the graph vary. We also characterize when the three metrics give rise to different orderings of vertex pairs. In particular, we find that for all admissible values of $α$ the Katz similarity index, the resistance distance, and the distance give the same ordering for node pairs in a cycle graph of arbitrary length, but the same is not true for the path graph.

Adinkras are highly structured graphs developed to study 1-dimensional supersymmetry algebras. A cyclic ordering of the edge colors of an Adinkra, or rainbow, determines a Riemann surface and a height function on the vertices of the Adinkra determines a divisor on this surface. We study the induced map from height functions to divisors on the Jacobian of the Riemann surface. In the first nontrivial case, a 5-dimensional hypercube corresponding to a Jacobian given by a product of 5 elliptic curves each with $j$-invariant 2048, we develop and characterize a purely combinatorial algorithm to compute height function images. We show that when restricted to a single elliptic curve, every height function is a multiple of a specified generating divisor, and raising and lowering vertices corresponds to adding or subtracting this generator. We also give strict bounds on the coefficients of this generator that appear in the collection of all divisors of height functions.

A spanning 2-forest separating vertices $u$ and $v$ of an undirected connected graph is a spanning forest with 2 components such that $u$ and $v$ are in distinct components. Aside from their combinatorial significance, spanning 2-forests have an important application to the calculation of resistance distance or effective resistance. The resistance distance between vertices $u$ and $v$ in a graph representing an electrical circuit with unit resistance on each edge is the number of spanning 2-forests separating $u$ and $v$ divided by the number of spanning trees in the graph. There are also well-known matrix theoretic methods for calculating resistance distance, but the way in which the structure of the underlying graph determines resistance distance via these methods is not well understood. For any connected graph $G$ with a 2-separator separating vertices $u$ and $v$, we show that the number of spanning trees and spanning 2-forests separating $u$ and $v$ can be expressed in terms of these same quantities for the smaller separated graphs, which makes computation significantly more tractable. An important special case is the preservation of the number of spanning 2-forests if $u$ and $v$ are in the same smaller graph. In this paper we demonstrate that this method of calculating resistance distance is more suitable for certain structured families of graphs than the more standard methods. We apply our results to count the number of spanning 2-forests and calculate the resistance distance in a family of Sierpinski triangles and in the family of linear 2-trees with a single bend.

We consider the graph $G_n$ with vertex set $V(G_n) = \{ 1, 2, \ldots, n\}$ and $\{i,j\} \in E(G_n)$ if and only if $0<|i-j| \leq 2$. We call $G_n$ the straight linear 2-tree on $n$ vertices. Using $Δ$--Y transformations and identities for the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers we obtain explicit formulae for the resistance distance $r_{G_n}(i,j)$ between any two vertices $i$ and $j$ of $G_n$. To our knowledge $\{G_n\}_{n=3}^\infty$ is the first nontrivial family with diameter going to $\infty$ for which all resistance distances have been explicitly calculated. Our result also gives formulae for the number of spanning trees and 2-forests in a straight linear 2-tree. We show that the maximal resistance distance in $G_n$ occurs between vertices 1 and $n$ and the minimal resistance distance occurs between vertices $n/2$ and $n/2+1$ for $n$ even (with a similar result for $n$ odd). It follows that $r_n(1,n) \to \infty$ as $n \to \infty$. Moreover, our explicit formula makes it possible to order the non-edges of $G_n$ exactly according to resistance distance, and this ordering agrees with the intuitive notion of distance on a graph. Consequently, $G_n$ is a geometric graph with entirely different properties than the random geometric graphs investigated in [6]. These results for straight linear 2-trees along with an example of a bent linear 2-tree and empirical results for additional graph classes convincingly demonstrate that resistance distance should not be discounted as a viable method for link prediction in geometric graphs.

In this note we consider the bent linear 2-tree and provide an explicit formula for the resistance distance $r_{G_n}(1,n)$ between the first and last vertices of the graph. We call the graph $G_n$ with vertex set $V(G_n) = \{ 1, 2, \ldots, n\}$ and $\{i,j\} \in E(G_n)$ if and only if $0<|i-j| \leq 2$ a straight linear 2-tree. We define the graph $H_n$ with $V(H_n)= V(G_n)$ and $E(H_n) = (E(G_n) \cup \{k,k+3\})\setminus(\{k+1,k+3\}$ to be a bent linear 2-tree with bend at vertex $k$.