arXiv++ Combinatorics

In this paper we compare the Katz similarity index to two other node similarity metrics, the standard distance and the resistance distance, for both path and cycle graphs. We consider how Katz similarity varies as the parameter $α$ and the size of the graph vary. We also characterize when the three metrics give rise to different orderings of vertex pairs. In particular, we find that for all admissible values of $α$ the Katz similarity index, the resistance distance, and the distance give the same ordering for node pairs in a cycle graph of arbitrary length, but the same is not true for the path graph.

This paper presents an introduction and expository account of a beautiful, current, and active application of recursions to the computation of resistance distance. Resistance distance, also referred to as effective resistance, is a well-known graph metric that arises naturally by considering a graph as an electrical circuit; heuristically resistance distance measures both the number of paths between two vertices in a graph and the cost of each path. This topic finds applications in a rich array of fields including social, biological, ecological, and transportation networks, chemistry, graph theory, numerical linear algebra, and engineering. A variety of methods are used in the field to determine resistance distance including recursive, mathematical, and graphical techniques. Sequences familiar to the readers of the Fibonacci Quarterly such as the Fibonacci and Lucas sequences appear quite often in results in the literature. Twenty five to forty years ago there were a handful of papers on resistance that appeared in the Fibonacci Quarterly and the Proceedings and recently papers on the subject have appeared again. It is hoped that this introductory expository account will interest readers of the Quarterly to renew interest in this current and active field.

Barret, Evans, and Francis conjectured that if $G$ is the straight linear 3-tree with $n$ vertices and $H$ is the straight linear 3-tree with $n+1$ vertices then \[\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} r_{H} (1, n+1) - r_G(1,n) = \frac{1}{14},\] where $r_G(u,v)$ and $r_H(u,v)$ are the resistance distance between vertices $u$ and $v$ in graphs $G$ and $H$ respectively. In this paper, we prove the conjecture by looking at the determinants of deleted Laplacian matrices. The proof uses a Laplace expansion method on a family of determinants to determine the underlying recursion this family satisfies and then uses routine linear algebra methods to obtain an exact Binet formula for the $n$-th term.

The main contribution of this paper is a six-step semi-automatic algorithm that obtains a recursion satisfied by a family of determinants by systematically and iteratively applying Laplace expansion to the underlying matrix family. The recursion allows explicit computation of the Binet form providing a closed formula for resistance distance between two specified nodes in a family of graphs. This approach is particularly suited for graph families with complex structures; the method is used to prove the 1 over 14 conjectured asymptotic formula for linear 3--trees. Additionally, although the literature on recursive formulas for resistance distances is quite large, the Fibonacci Quarterly and the Proceedings have almost no such results despite the fact that many recursions related to resistance distances involve the Fibonacci numbers. Therefore, a secondary purpose of the paper is to provide a brief introductory survey of graph families, accompanied by figures, Laplacian matrices, and typical recursive results, supported by a modest bibliography of current papers on many relevant graph families, in the hope to involve Fibonaccians in this active and beautiful field.

The 2022 Fibonacci Conference held in Sarajevo introduced the Circuit Array, a two-dimensional array associated with the resistance labels of electrical circuits whose underlying graph when embedded in the Cartesian plane has the form of a triangular n-grid. The presentation used row reduction, a computational method alternative to the traditional method using the Laplacian. The presentation explored reconsidering the Circuit Array in terms of polynomials instead of numbers as a means to facilitate finding patterns. The present paper shows the fruitfulness of this approach. The main result of the current paper states that the characteristic polynomials corresponding to the recursions of single or multi-variable polynomial formulations of the Circuit Array exclusively have powers of 9 as roots. The proof methodology uses the approach of annihilators. Several initial cases and one major sub-case are proven.

Except for Koshy who devotes seven pages to applications of Fibonacci Numbers to electric circuits, most books and the Fibonacci Quarterly have been relatively silent on applications of graphs and electric circuits to Fibonacci numbers. This paper continues a recent trend of papers studying the interplay of graphs, circuits, and Fibonacci numbers by presenting and studying the Circuit Array, an infinite 2-dimensional array whose entries are electric resistances labelling edge values of circuits associated with a family of graphs. The Circuit Array has several features distinguishing it from other more familiar arrays such as the Binomial Array and Wythoff Array. For example, it can be proven modulo a strongly supported conjecture that the numerators of its left-most diagonal do not satisfy any linear, homogeneous, recursion, with constant coefficients (LHRCC). However, we conjecture with supporting numerical evidence an asymptotic formula involving $π$ satisfied by the left-most diagonal of the Circuit Array.

In [Evans, Francis 2022; Hendel] the authors investigated resistance distance in triangular grid graphs and observed several types of asymptotic behavior. This paper extends their work by studying the initial, non-asymptotic, behavior found when equivalent circuit transformations are performed, reducing the rows in the triangular grid graph one row at a time. The main conjecture characterizes, after reducing an arbitrary number of times an initial triangular grid all of whose edge resistances are identically one, when edge resistance values are less than, equal to, or greater than one. A special case of the conjecture is proven. The main theorem identifies patterns of repeating edge resistances arising in diagonals of a triangular grid reduced $s$ times provided the original grid has at least $4s$ rows of triangles. This paper also improves upon the notation, concepts, and proof techniques introduced by the authors previously.

A spanning 2-forest separating vertices $u$ and $v$ of an undirected connected graph is a spanning forest with 2 components such that $u$ and $v$ are in distinct components. Aside from their combinatorial significance, spanning 2-forests have an important application to the calculation of resistance distance or effective resistance. The resistance distance between vertices $u$ and $v$ in a graph representing an electrical circuit with unit resistance on each edge is the number of spanning 2-forests separating $u$ and $v$ divided by the number of spanning trees in the graph. There are also well-known matrix theoretic methods for calculating resistance distance, but the way in which the structure of the underlying graph determines resistance distance via these methods is not well understood. For any connected graph $G$ with a 2-separator separating vertices $u$ and $v$, we show that the number of spanning trees and spanning 2-forests separating $u$ and $v$ can be expressed in terms of these same quantities for the smaller separated graphs, which makes computation significantly more tractable. An important special case is the preservation of the number of spanning 2-forests if $u$ and $v$ are in the same smaller graph. In this paper we demonstrate that this method of calculating resistance distance is more suitable for certain structured families of graphs than the more standard methods. We apply our results to count the number of spanning 2-forests and calculate the resistance distance in a family of Sierpinski triangles and in the family of linear 2-trees with a single bend.

We consider the graph $G_n$ with vertex set $V(G_n) = \{ 1, 2, \ldots, n\}$ and $\{i,j\} \in E(G_n)$ if and only if $0<|i-j| \leq 2$. We call $G_n$ the straight linear 2-tree on $n$ vertices. Using $Δ$--Y transformations and identities for the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers we obtain explicit formulae for the resistance distance $r_{G_n}(i,j)$ between any two vertices $i$ and $j$ of $G_n$. To our knowledge $\{G_n\}_{n=3}^\infty$ is the first nontrivial family with diameter going to $\infty$ for which all resistance distances have been explicitly calculated. Our result also gives formulae for the number of spanning trees and 2-forests in a straight linear 2-tree. We show that the maximal resistance distance in $G_n$ occurs between vertices 1 and $n$ and the minimal resistance distance occurs between vertices $n/2$ and $n/2+1$ for $n$ even (with a similar result for $n$ odd). It follows that $r_n(1,n) \to \infty$ as $n \to \infty$. Moreover, our explicit formula makes it possible to order the non-edges of $G_n$ exactly according to resistance distance, and this ordering agrees with the intuitive notion of distance on a graph. Consequently, $G_n$ is a geometric graph with entirely different properties than the random geometric graphs investigated in [6]. These results for straight linear 2-trees along with an example of a bent linear 2-tree and empirical results for additional graph classes convincingly demonstrate that resistance distance should not be discounted as a viable method for link prediction in geometric graphs.

In this note we consider the bent linear 2-tree and provide an explicit formula for the resistance distance $r_{G_n}(1,n)$ between the first and last vertices of the graph. We call the graph $G_n$ with vertex set $V(G_n) = \{ 1, 2, \ldots, n\}$ and $\{i,j\} \in E(G_n)$ if and only if $0<|i-j| \leq 2$ a straight linear 2-tree. We define the graph $H_n$ with $V(H_n)= V(G_n)$ and $E(H_n) = (E(G_n) \cup \{k,k+3\})\setminus(\{k+1,k+3\}$ to be a bent linear 2-tree with bend at vertex $k$.