arXiv++ Combinatorics

A temporal (directed) graph is a graph whose edges are available only at specific times during its lifetime, $τ$. Paths are sequences of adjacent edges whose appearing times are either strictly increasing or non-strictly increasingly (i.e., non-decreasing) depending on the scenario. Then, the classical concept of connected components and also of unilateral connected components in static graphs and digraphs naturally extends to the temporal setting. In this paper, we answer to the following fundamental questions in temporal graphs. (i) What is the complexity of deciding the existence of a component of size $k$, parameterized by $τ$, by $k$, and by $k+τ$? We show that this question has a different answer depending on the considered definition of component and whether the temporal graph is directed or undirected. (ii) What is the minimum running time required to check whether a subset of vertices are pairwise reachable? A quadratic algorithm is known but, contrary to the static case, we show that a better running time is unlikely unless SETH fails. (iii) Is it possible to verify whether a subset of vertices is a component in polynomial time? We show that depending on the definition of temporal component this test is NP-complete.

A (directed) temporal graph is a (directed) graph whose edges are available only at specific times during its (discretized) lifetime $τ$. In this setting, we ask that walks respect the temporal aspect by defining $\textit{temporal walks}$ as sequences of adjacent edges whose appearing times are either strictly increasing or non-decreasing (here called non-strict), depending on the scenario. The notion of disjointness between walks is also not unique: two walks are $\textit{vertex-disjoint}$ if they do not share a vertex, and are $\textit{temporal vertex-disjoint}$ if they do not share a vertex at the same time. Thus a $\textit{temporal path}$ is a temporal walk where no repetition of vertices, at any time, is allowed. This is an important distinction that separates the interpretation of our results from those of previous works on the topic. In this paper we focus on various questions regarding connectivity (maximum number of disjoint paths) and robustness (minimum size of a cut) between a given pair of vertices. Such problems are related to the well-known Menger's Theorem on static graphs. We explore all possible interpretations of such problems, according to vertex and temporal vertex-disjointness, strict and non-strict temporal paths, and directed and undirected temporal graphs. We present a number of new results, the main of which states that Menger's Theorem holds when the maximum number of temporal vertex-disjoint temporal paths is equal to 1.