arXiv++ Combinatorics

A temporal (directed) graph is a graph whose edges are available only at specific times during its lifetime, $τ$. Paths are sequences of adjacent edges whose appearing times are either strictly increasing or non-strictly increasingly (i.e., non-decreasing) depending on the scenario. Then, the classical concept of connected components and also of unilateral connected components in static graphs and digraphs naturally extends to the temporal setting. In this paper, we answer to the following fundamental questions in temporal graphs. (i) What is the complexity of deciding the existence of a component of size $k$, parameterized by $τ$, by $k$, and by $k+τ$? We show that this question has a different answer depending on the considered definition of component and whether the temporal graph is directed or undirected. (ii) What is the minimum running time required to check whether a subset of vertices are pairwise reachable? A quadratic algorithm is known but, contrary to the static case, we show that a better running time is unlikely unless SETH fails. (iii) Is it possible to verify whether a subset of vertices is a component in polynomial time? We show that depending on the definition of temporal component this test is NP-complete.

A temporal graph ${\cal G}$ is a graph that changes with time. More specifically, it is a pair $(G, λ)$ where $G$ is a graph and $λ$ is a function on the edges of $G$ that describes when each edge $e\in E(G)$ is active. Given vertices $s,t\in V(G)$, a temporal $s,t$-path is a path in $G$ that traverses edges in non-decreasing time; and if $s,t$ are non-adjacent, then a temporal $s,t$-cut is a subset $S\subseteq V(G)\setminus\{s,t\}$ whose removal destroys all temporal $s,t$-paths. It is known that Menger's Theorem does not hold on this context, i.e., that the maximum number of internally vertex disjoint temporal $s,t$-paths is not necessarily equal to the minimum size of a temporal $s,t$-cut. In a seminal paper, Kempe, Kleinberg and Kumar (STOC'2000) defined a graph $G$ to be Mengerian if equality holds on $(G,λ)$ for every function $λ$. They then proved that, if each edge is allowed to be active only once in $(G,λ)$, then $G$ is Mengerian if and only if $G$ has no gem as topological minor. In this paper, we generalize their result by allowing edges to be active more than once, giving a characterization also in terms of forbidden structures. We additionally provide a polynomial time recognition algorithm.

A (directed) temporal graph is a (directed) graph whose edges are available only at specific times during its (discretized) lifetime $τ$. In this setting, we ask that walks respect the temporal aspect by defining $\textit{temporal walks}$ as sequences of adjacent edges whose appearing times are either strictly increasing or non-decreasing (here called non-strict), depending on the scenario. The notion of disjointness between walks is also not unique: two walks are $\textit{vertex-disjoint}$ if they do not share a vertex, and are $\textit{temporal vertex-disjoint}$ if they do not share a vertex at the same time. Thus a $\textit{temporal path}$ is a temporal walk where no repetition of vertices, at any time, is allowed. This is an important distinction that separates the interpretation of our results from those of previous works on the topic. In this paper we focus on various questions regarding connectivity (maximum number of disjoint paths) and robustness (minimum size of a cut) between a given pair of vertices. Such problems are related to the well-known Menger's Theorem on static graphs. We explore all possible interpretations of such problems, according to vertex and temporal vertex-disjointness, strict and non-strict temporal paths, and directed and undirected temporal graphs. We present a number of new results, the main of which states that Menger's Theorem holds when the maximum number of temporal vertex-disjoint temporal paths is equal to 1.

In this paper, we prove that the MaxCut problem is NP-complete on permutation graphs, settling a long-standing open problem that appeared in the 1985 column of the "Ongoing Guide to NP-completeness" by David S. Johnson.

What does it mean today to study a problem from a computational point of view? We focus on parameterized complexity and on Column 16 "Graph Restrictions and Their Effect" of D. S. Johnson's Ongoing guide, where several puzzles were proposed in a summary table with 30 graph classes as rows and 11 problems as columns. Several of the 330 entries remain unclassified into Polynomial or NP-complete after 35 years. We provide a full dichotomy for the Steiner Tree column by proving that the problem is NP-complete when restricted to Undirected Path graphs. We revise Johnson's summary table according to the granularity provided by the parameterized complexity for NP-complete problems.

In this work, we introduce a new graph convexity, that we call Cycle Convexity, motivated by related notions in Knot Theory. For a graph $G=(V,E)$, define the interval function in the Cycle Convexity as $I_{cc}(S) = S\cup \{v\in V(G)\mid \text{there is a cycle }C\text{ in }G\text{ such that } V(C)\setminus S=\{v\}\}$, for every $S\subseteq V(G)$. We say that $S\subseteq V(G)$ is convex if $I_{cc}(S)=S$. The convex hull of $S\subseteq V(G)$, denoted by $Hull(S)$, is the inclusion-wise minimal convex set $S'$ such that $S\subseteq S'$. A set $S\subseteq V(G)$ is called a hull set if $Hull(S)=V(G)$. The hull number of $G$ in the cycle convexity, denoted by $hn_{cc}(G)$, is the cardinality of a smallest hull set of $G$. We first present the motivation for introducing such convexity and the study of its related hull number. Then, we prove that: the hull number of a 4-regular planar graph is at most half of its vertices; computing the hull number of a planar graph is an $NP$-complete problem; computing the hull humber of chordal graphs, $P_4$-sparse graphs and grids can be done in polynomial time.

An orientation $D$ of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a digraph obtained from $G$ by replacing each edge by exactly one of the two possible arcs with the same end vertices. For each $v \in V(G)$, the indegree of $v$ in $D$, denoted by $d^-_D(v)$, is the number of arcs with head $v$ in $D$. An orientation $D$ of $G$ is proper if $d^-_D(u)\neq d^-_D(v)$, for all $uv\in E(G)$. An orientation with maximum indegree at most $k$ is called a $k$-orientation. The proper orientation number of $G$, denoted by $\overrightarrowχ(G)$, is the minimum integer $k$ such that $G$ admits a proper $k$-orientation. We prove that determining whether $\overrightarrowχ(G) \leq k$ is NP-complete for chordal graphs of bounded diameter, but can be solved in linear-time in the subclass of quasi-threshold graphs. When parameterizing by $k$, we argue that this problem is FPT for chordal graphs and argue that no polynomial kernel exists, unless $NP\subseteq coNP/\ poly$. We present a better kernel to the subclass of split graphs and a linear kernel to the class of cobipartite graphs. Concerning bounds, we prove tight upper bounds for subclasses of block graphs. We also present new families of trees having proper orientation number at most 2 and at most 3. Actually, we prove a general bound stating that any graph $G$ having no adjacent vertices of degree at least $c+1$ have proper orientation number at most $c$. This implies new classes of (outer)planar graphs with bounded proper orientation number. We also prove that maximal outerplanar graphs $G$ whose weak-dual is a path satisfy $\overrightarrowχ(G)\leq 13$. Finally, we present simple bounds to the classes of chordal claw-free graphs and cographs.

We investigate a number of coloring problems restricted to bipartite graphs with bounded diameter. First, we investigate the $k$-List Coloring, List $k$-Coloring, and $k$-Precoloring Extension problems on bipartite graphs with diameter at most $d$, proving NP-completeness in most cases, and leaving open only the List $3$-Coloring and $3$-Precoloring Extension problems when $d=3$. Some of these results are obtained through a proof that the Surjective $C_6$-Homomorphism problem is NP-complete on bipartite graphs with diameter at most four. Although the latter result has been already proved [Vikas, 2017], we present ours as an alternative simpler one. As a byproduct, we also get that $3$-Biclique Partition is NP-complete. An attempt to prove this result was presented in [Fleischner, Mujuni, Paulusma, and Szeider, 2009], but there was a flaw in their proof, which we identify and discuss here. Finally, we prove that the $3$-Fall Coloring problem is NP-complete on bipartite graphs with diameter at most four, and prove that NP-completeness for diameter three would also imply NP-completeness of $3$-Precoloring Extension on diameter three, thus closing the previously mentioned open cases. This would also answer a question posed in [Kratochvíl, Tuza, and Voigt, 2002].

Given a graph $G$ and a positive integer $d$, an orthogonal vector $d$-coloring of $G$ is an assignment $f$ of vectors of $\mathbb{R}^d$ to $V(G)$ in such a way that adjacent vertices receive orthogonal vectors. The orthogonal chromatic number of $G$, denoted by $χ_v(G)$, is the minimum $d$ for which $G$ admits an orthogonal vector $d$-coloring. This notion has close ties with the notions of Lovász Theta Function, quantum chromatic number, and many other problems, and even though this and related metrics have been extensively studied over the years, we have found that there is a gap in the knowledge concerning the edge version of the problem. In this article, we discuss this version and its relation with other insteresting known facts, and pose a question about the orthogonal chromatic index of cubic graphs.

A b-coloring of a graph is a proper coloring such that each color class has at least one vertex which is adjacent to each other color class. The b-spectrum of $G$ is the set $S_{b}(G)$ of integers $k$ such that $G$ has a b-coloring with $k$ colors and $b(G)=\max S_{b}(G)$ is the b-chromatic number of $G$. A graph is b-continous if $S_{b}(G)=[χ(G),b(G)]\cap \mathbb{Z}$. An infinite number of graphs that are not b-continuous is known. It is also known that graphs with girth at least 10 are b-continuous. A partial Grundy coloring is a proper coloring $f:V(G)\rightarrow \{1,\ldots,k\}$ such that each color class $i$ contains some vertex $u$ that is adjacent to every color class $j$ such that $j<i$. The partial Grundy number of $G$ is the maximum value $\partialΓ(G)$ for which $G$ has a partial Grundy coloring. In this work, we prove that graphs with girth at least 8 are b-continuous, and that the b-spectrum of a graph $G$ with girth at least 7 contains the integers between $2χ(G)$ and $b(G)$. We also prove that $\partialΓ(G)$ equals a known upper bound when $G$ is a graph with girth at least 7. These results generalize previous ones by Linhares-Sales and Silva (2017), and by Shi et al.(2005).

A connected ordering $(v_1, v_2, \ldots, v_n)$ of $V(G)$ is an ordering of the vertices such that $v_i$ has at least one neighbour in $\{v_1, \ldots, v_{i - 1}\}$ for every $i \in \{2, \ldots, n\}$. A connected greedy coloring (CGC for short) is a coloring obtained by applying the greedy algorithm to a connected ordering. This has been first introduced in 1989 by Hertz and de Werra, but still very little is known about this problem. An interesting aspect is that, contrary to the traditional greedy coloring, it is not always true that a graph has a connected ordering that produces an optimal coloring; this motivates the definition of the connected chromatic number of $G$, which is the smallest value $χ_c(G)$ such that there exists a CGC of $G$ with $χ_c(G)$ colors. An even more interesting fact is that $χ_c(G) \le χ(G)+1$ for every graph $G$ (Benevides et. al. 2014). In this paper, in the light of the dichotomy for the coloring problem restricted to $H$-free graphs given by Král et.al. in 2001, we are interested in investigating the problems of, given an $H$-free graph $G$: (1). deciding whether $χ_c(G)=χ(G)$; and (2). given also a positive integer $k$, deciding whether $χ_c(G)\le k$. We have proved that Problem (2) has the same dichotomy as the coloring problem (i.e., it is polynomial when $H$ is an induced subgraph of $P_4$ or of $P_3+K_1$, and it is NP-complete otherwise). As for Problem (1), we have proved that $χ_c(G) = χ(G)$ always hold when $G$ is an induced subgraph of $P_5$ or of $P_4+K_1$, and that it is NP-hard to decide whether $χ_c(G)=χ(G)$ when $H$ is not a linear forest or contains an induced $P_9$. We mention that some of the results actually involve fixed $k$ and fixed $χ(G)$.

Given a proper coloring $f$ of a graph $G$, a b-vertex in $f$ is a vertex that is adjacent to every color class but its own. It is a b-coloring if every color class contains at least one b-vertex, and it is a fall-coloring if every vertex is a b-vertex. The b-chromatic number of $G$ is the maximum integer $b(G)$ for which $G$ has a b-coloring with $b(G)$ colors, while the fall-chromatic number and the fall-acromatic number of $G$ are, respectively, the minimum and maximum integers $f_1(G),f_2(G)$ for which $G$ has a fall-coloring. In this article, we explore the concepts of b-homomorphisms and Type II homomorphisms, which generalize the concepts of b-colorings and fall-colorings, and present some meta-theorems concerning products of graphs. As a result, we derive some previously known facts about these metrics on graph products. We also give a negative answer to a question posed by Kaul and Mitillos about fall-colorings of perfect graphs.

Given a graph $G$, and a spanning subgraph $H$ of $G$, a circular $q$-backbone $k$-coloring of $(G,H)$ is a proper $k$-coloring $c$ of $G$ such that $q\le \lvert c(u)-c(v)\rvert \le k-q$, for every edge $uv\in E(H)$. The circular $q$-backbone chromatic number of $(G,H)$, denoted by $CBC_q(G,H)$, is the minimum integer $k$ for which there exists a circular $q$-backbone $k$-coloring of $(G,H)$. The Four Color Theorem implies that whenever $G$ is planar, we have $CBC_2(G,H)\le 8$. It is conjectured that this upper bound can be improved to 7 when $H$ is a tree, and to 6 when $H$ is a matching. In this work, we show that: 1) if $G$ is planar and has no $C_4$ as subgraph, and $H$ is a linear spanning forest of $G$, then $CBC_2(G,H)\leq 7$; 2) if $G$ is a plane graph having no two 3-faces sharing an edge, and $H$ is a matching of $G$, then $CBC_2(G,H)\leq 6$; and 3) if $G$ is planar and has no $C_4$ nor $C_5$ as subgraph, and $H$ is a mathing of $G$, then $CBC_2(G,H)\leq 5$. These results partially answer questions posed by Broersma, Fujisawa and Yoshimoto (2003), and by Broersma, Fomin and Golovach (2007). It also points towards a positive answer for the Steinberg's Conjecture.

A b-coloring of the vertices of a graph is a proper coloring where each color class contains a vertex which is adjacent to each other color class. The b-chromatic number of $G$ is the maximum integer $b(G)$ for which $G$ has a b-coloring with $b(G)$ colors. A graph $G$ is b-continuous if $G$ has a b-coloring with $k$ colors, for every integer $k$ in the interval $[χ(G),b(G)]$. It is known that not all graphs are b-continuous. In this article, we show that if $G$ has girth at least 10, then $G$ is b-continuous.

In a recent article [5], the authors claim that the distance between the b-chromatic index of a tree and a known upper bound is at most 1. At the same time, in [7] the authors claim to be able to construct a tree where this difference is bigger than 1. However, the given example was disconnected, i.e., actually consisted of a forest. Here, we slightly modify their construction in order to produce trees, thus getting that indeed the difference between the b-chromatic index of trees and the known upper bound can be arbitrarily large. We also point out the mistake made in [5].

A proper $k$-coloring of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a function $c: V(G)\to \{1,\ldots,k\}$ such that $c(u)\neq c(v)$, for every $uv\in E(G)$. The chromatic number $χ(G)$ is the minimum $k$ such that there exists a proper $k$-coloring of $G$. Given a spanning subgraph $H$ of $G$, a $q$-backbone $k$-coloring of $(G,H)$ is a proper $k$-coloring $c$ of $V(G)$ such that $\lvert c(u)-c(v)\rvert \ge q$, for every edge $uv\in E(H)$. The $q$-backbone chromatic number $BBC_q(G,H)$ is the smallest $k$ for which there exists a $q$-backbone $k$-coloring of $(G,H)$. In this work, we show that every connected graph $G$ has a generating tree $T$ such that $BBC_q(G,T) = \max\{χ(G),\left\lceil\frac{χ(G)}{2}\right\rceil+q\}$, and that this value is the best possible. As a direct consequence, we get that every connected graph $G$ has a spanning tree $T$ for which $BBC_2(G,T)=χ(G)$, if $χ(G)\ge 4$, or $BBC_2(G,T)=χ(G)+1$, otherwise. Thus, by applying the Four Color Theorem, we have that every connected nonbipartite planar graph $G$ has a spanning tree $T$ such that $BBC_2(G,T)=4$. This settles a question by Wang, Bu, Montassier and Raspaud (2012), and generalizes a number of previous partial results to their question.

A b-coloring of a graph is a coloring of its vertices such that every color class contains a vertex that has a neighbor in all other classes. The b-chromatic number of a graph is the largest integer k such that the graph has a b-coloring with k colors. We show how to compute in polynomial time the b-chromatic number of a graph of girth at least 9. This improves the seminal result of Irving and Manlove on trees.