arXiv++ Combinatorics

Graphs whose maximum clique size exceeds half of the total number of vertices satisfy a classical property: the family of their maximum sized cliques can be pierced by a single vertex. This result dates back to a 1965 theorem by Hajnal. Motivated by this theorem, Jung, Keszegh, Pálvölgyi, and Yuditsky recently conjectured that an analogous result should hold for hypergraphs of larger uniformity, with an appropriate constant replacing the threshold $1/2$. In this paper we refute this conjecture in a strong form. We show that for any constant $c<1$ and integers $k\ge 3$ and $t\ge 1$, there exist $k$-uniform hypergraphs $G$ whose maximum clique size exceeds $c|V(G)|$, yet the family of maximum size cliques of $G$ cannot be pierced by $t$ vertices. This demonstrates that no universal constant threshold guarantees bounded piercing number for maximum cliques in uniform hypergraphs. We discuss further questions concerning the relationship between clique size and piercing maximum cliques in hypergraphs, and introduce a geometric variant of the problem using Helly's Theorem.

Given a family of sets on the plane, we say that the family is intersecting if for any two sets from the family their interiors intersect. In this paper, we study intersecting families of triangles with vertices in a given set of points. In particular, we show that if a set $P$ of $n$ points is in convex position, then the largest intersecting family of triangles with vertices in $P$ contains at most $(\frac{1}{4}+o(1))\binom{n}{3}$ triangles.

In a nutshell, we show that polynomials and nested polytopes are topological, algebraic and algorithmically equivalent. Given two polytops $A\subseteq B$ and a number $k$, the Nested Polytope Problem (NPP) asks, if there exists a polytope $X$ on $k$ vertices such that $A\subseteq X \subseteq B$. The polytope $A$ is given by a set of vertices and the polytope $B$ is given by the defining hyperplanes. We show a universality theorem for NPP. Given an instance $I$ of the NPP, we define the solutions set of $I$ as $$ V'(I) = \{(x_1,\ldots,x_k)\in \mathbb{R}^{k\cdot n} : A\subseteq \text{conv}(x_1,\ldots,x_k) \subseteq B\}.$$ As there are many symmetries, induced by permutations of the vertices, we will consider the \emph{normalized} solution space $V(I)$. Let $F$ be a finite set of polynomials, with bounded solution space. Then there is an instance $I$ of the NPP, which has a rationally-equivalent normalized solution space $V(I)$. Two sets $V$ and $W$ are rationally equivalent if there exists a homeomorphism $f : V \rightarrow W$ such that both $f$ and $f^{-1}$ are given by rational functions. A function $f:V\rightarrow W$ is a homeomorphism, if it is continuous, invertible and its inverse is continuous as well. As a corollary, we show that NPP is $\exists \mathbb{R}$-complete. This implies that unless $\exists \mathbb{R} =$ NP, the NPP is not contained in the complexity class NP. Note that those results already follow from a recent paper by Shitov. Our proof is geometric and arguably easier.

We introduce a geometric generalization of Hall's marriage theorem. For any family $F = \{X_1, \dots, X_m\}$ of finite sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$, we give conditions under which it is possible to choose a point $x_i\in X_i$ for every $1\leq i \leq m$ in such a way that the points $\{x_1,...,x_m\}\subset \mathbb{R}^d$ are in general position. We give two proofs, one elementary proof requiring slightly stronger conditions, and one proof using topological techniques in the spirit of Aharoni and Haxell's celebrated generalization of Hall's theorem.

We give the following extension of Barany's colorful Caratheodory theorem: Let M be an oriented matroid and N a matroid with rank function r, both defined on the same ground set V and satisfying rank(M) < rank(N). If every subset A of V with r(V - A) < rank (M) contains a positive circuit of M, then some independent set of N contains a positive circuit of M.