arXiv++ Combinatorics

In a nutshell, we show that polynomials and nested polytopes are topological, algebraic and algorithmically equivalent. Given two polytops $A\subseteq B$ and a number $k$, the Nested Polytope Problem (NPP) asks, if there exists a polytope $X$ on $k$ vertices such that $A\subseteq X \subseteq B$. The polytope $A$ is given by a set of vertices and the polytope $B$ is given by the defining hyperplanes. We show a universality theorem for NPP. Given an instance $I$ of the NPP, we define the solutions set of $I$ as $$ V'(I) = \{(x_1,\ldots,x_k)\in \mathbb{R}^{k\cdot n} : A\subseteq \text{conv}(x_1,\ldots,x_k) \subseteq B\}.$$ As there are many symmetries, induced by permutations of the vertices, we will consider the \emph{normalized} solution space $V(I)$. Let $F$ be a finite set of polynomials, with bounded solution space. Then there is an instance $I$ of the NPP, which has a rationally-equivalent normalized solution space $V(I)$. Two sets $V$ and $W$ are rationally equivalent if there exists a homeomorphism $f : V \rightarrow W$ such that both $f$ and $f^{-1}$ are given by rational functions. A function $f:V\rightarrow W$ is a homeomorphism, if it is continuous, invertible and its inverse is continuous as well. As a corollary, we show that NPP is $\exists \mathbb{R}$-complete. This implies that unless $\exists \mathbb{R} =$ NP, the NPP is not contained in the complexity class NP. Note that those results already follow from a recent paper by Shitov. Our proof is geometric and arguably easier.

In this paper we show that every sufficiently large family of convex bodies in the plane has a large subfamily in convex position provided that the number of common tangents of each pair of bodies is bounded and every subfamily of size five is in convex position. (If each pair of bodies have at most two common tangents it is enough to assume that every triple is in convex position, and likewise, if each pair of bodies have at most four common tangents it is enough to assume that every quadruple is in convex position.) This confirms a conjecture of Pach and Toth, and generalizes a theorem of Bisztriczky and Fejes Toth. Our results on families of convex bodies are consequences of more general Ramsey-type results about the crossing patterns of systems of graphs of continuous functions $f:[0,1] \to \mathbb{R}$. On our way towards proving the Pach-Toth conjecture we obtain a combinatorial characterization of such systems of graphs in which all subsystems of equal size induce equivalent crossing patterns. These highly organized structures are what we call regular systems of paths and they are natural generalizations of the notions of cups and caps from the famous theorem of Erdos and Szekeres. The characterization of regular systems is combinatorial and introduces some auxiliary structures which may be of independent interest.