arXiv++ Combinatorics

We consider $k$-graphs, $\mathcal{F}\subset \binom{[n]}{k}$, $k\geq 3$. A $k$-graph is called intersecting if any two of its edges have non-empty intersection. It is called a star if all its edges share a common vertex. The $k$-graph $\mathcal{F}$ is called Helly if all its intersecting subfamilies are stars. If the same is required only for subfamilies consisting of three edges, it is called triangle-free. It is well known that for $n\geq 3k/2$, the full star is the unique largest triangle-free family whence the largest Helly family as well. In 1984 Tuza proved the best possible bound $|\mathcal{F}|\leq \binom{n-k-1}{k-1}+\binom{n-2}{k-2}+1$ for Helly families that are not stars, albeit only for some unspecified $n>n_0(k)$. The aim of this paper is twofold. First we establish the same bound for $n>2k$. Second we show that for $n>12k^2$ the same upper bound holds for triangle-free families. It is shown as well that it is not true for $2k<n\leq 3k-4$.

A central problem in extremal set theory is to determine or estimate $m(n,k,t),n>2k\geq 2t$, the maximum size of an intersecting $k$-graph and covering number at least $t$(see the paper for the definitions). For $t=1$ and $2$ the classical Erdős-Ko-Rado Theorem and the Hilton-Milner Theorem provide the answer.The complete solution for $t=3$ was only achieved recently . There are some partial results for $t=4,5$ but for the general case even to determine the asymptotic appears to be hopelessly difficult . Denoting by $\widetilde{m}(n,k,t)$ the maximum of $|\mathcal{F}||\mathcal{G}|$ for a pair of cross-intersecting $k$-graphs with covering number at least $t$, $\widetilde{m}(n,k,t)\geq {m}(n,k,t)^2$ is obvious. Pyber showed that equality holds for $t=1$. The same was shown for $t=2$ in a wide range(cf.[7]). Quite surprisingly our results show that the inequality is strict for $t\geq 3$ and for $n>n_0(k,t)$, Theorem 1.7 determines the exact value of $\widetilde{m}(n,k,t)$ for $k>2t$ and $n$ sufficiently large.

For integers $k ,\ell \geq 2$ let $m(k,\ell)$ denote the maximum of $|\mathcal{F}| |\mathcal{G}|$ where the maximum is taken over all pairs of cross-intersecting families, $\mathcal{F}$ being a $k$-graph with covering number $\ell$ and $\mathcal{G}$ a $\ell$-graph with covering number $k$ (see the paper for the definitions). Erdos and Lovasz initiated the study of the one family version. That is, they provided lower and upper bounds on the maximal size $m(k)=|\mathcal{F}|$ where $\mathcal{F}$ is an intersecting k-graph with covering number $k$. In many similar situations $m(k,k)=m(k)^2$ holds. However, as our results show $m(k,k)/m(k)^2$ is tending to infinity as $k$ grows(Th.1.5) . For $k>k_0$ we establish the exact value $m(k,k)=(k^{k-1}+k-1)^2$(Th.1.6). As to smaller values we prove $m(3,3)=121$ (Th.1.7) and determine $m(2,k) $ for all $k\geq 2$ (Th.1.8).

Two families $\mathcal{F},\mathcal{G}$ of $k$-subsets of $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ are called {\it non-trivial cross-intersecting} if $F\cap G\neq \emptyset$ for all $F\in \mathcal{F}, G\in \mathcal{G}$ and $\cap \{F\colon F\in \mathcal{F}\}=\emptyset=\cap \{G\colon G\in\mathcal{G}\}$. In this note, we establish the product version of the Hilton-Milner Theorem for $k\geq 8$ in the full range. That is, if $\mathcal{F},\mathcal{G}\subset \binom{[n]}{k}$ are non-trivial cross-intersecting, $n\geq 2k+1$ and $k\geq 8$, then \[ |\mathcal{F}||\mathcal{G}|\leq \left(\binom{n-1}{k-1}- \binom{n-k-1}{k-1} +1\right)^2. \]

A family $\mathcal{F}\subset \binom{[n]}{k}$ is called intersecting if $F\cap F'\neq \emptyset$ for all $F,F'\in \mathcal{F}$. The covering number of a family $\mathcal{F}$ is defined as the minimum size of $T\subset [n]$ such that $T\cap F\neq \emptyset$ for all $F\in \mathcal{F}$. In 1980, the first author proved that for sufficiently large $n$, any intersecting $k$-graph $\mathcal{F}$ with covering number at least three, satisfies $|\mathcal{F}|\leq \binom{n-1}{k-1}-\binom{n-k}{k-1}-\binom{n-k-1}{k-1}+\binom{n-2k}{k-1}+\binom{n-k-2}{k-3}+3$. There was very little progress during more than forty years but recently (cf. \cite{FW25}) with a completely different approach we proved the same result for the full range $n\geq 2k$ and $k\geq 7$. In this short paper we prove the same inequality for all the remaining cases.

A central theme in extremal combinatorics is the study of the maximum number of edges in an $r$-uniform hypergraph ($r$-graph) with matching number at most $s$ (the Erdős Matching Conjecture) or with pairwise intersection at least $t$ (the $t$-intersection problem). The maximum sizes for these problems are typically achieved by trivial constructions: for the matching problem, the extremal construction consists of all edges intersecting a fixed set of $s$ vertices, while for the intersection problem, it consists of all edges containing a fixed set of $t$ vertices. In this paper, we investigate the \emph{non-trivial} $r$-partite $r$-graphs where each part is of size $n$. We determine the exact bounds for both the matching problem and the intersection problem when $n$ is sufficiently large. Furthermore, for the intersection problem, we resolve the cases $t=1$ and $t=r-2$ for all $n \ge 2$. Our results partially confirm a conjecture of Lu and Ma.

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a family of $k$-element subsets of $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$. For $t\geq 1$, we say that $\mathcal{F}$ is {\it 3-wise $t$-intersecting} if $|F_1\cap F_2\cap F_3|\geq t$ for all $F_1,F_2,F_3\in \mathcal{F}$. In the present paper, we prove that if $\mathcal{F}$ is 3-wise $t$-intersecting and $n\geq \frac{\sqrt{4t+9}-1}{2}k$, $k>t\geq 46$, then $|\mathcal{F}|\leq \binom{n-t}{k-t}$. The restriction on $n$ is asymptotically best possible. The corresponding result for non-trivial 3-wise $t$-intersecting families is obtained as well for $n\geq \frac{\sqrt{4t+9}-1}{2}k$ and $k>t\geq 55$.

A famous conjecture of Erdős asserts that for $k\ge 3$, the maximum number of edges in an $n$-vertex $k$-uniform hypergraph without $s+1$ pairwise disjoint edges is $\max\{\binom{n}{k}-\binom{n-s}{k},\binom{sk+k-1}{k}\}$. This problem has been central in extremal combinatorics, with substantial progress in the literature, including a complete solution for $k=3$ due to the first author. In this paper, we make progress towards the $4$-uniform case, proving the conjecture for $n\ge 5s$ and sufficiently large $n$, thereby taking a first step analogous to the $3$-uniform case. The main technical contribution is a stability result of independent interest. We further apply this stability to resolve two new instances of conjectures on the minimum $d$-degree threshold for matchings in $5$- and $6$-uniform hypergraphs, in a strengthened form.

Let $\binom{[n]}{k}$ denote the collection of all $k$-subsets of the standard $n$-set $[n]=\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$. Let $n>2k$ and let $\mathcal{F}\subset \binom{[n]}{k}$ be an {\it intersecting} $k$-graph, i.e., $F\cap F'\neq \emptyset$ for all $F,F'\in \mathcal{F}$. The number of edges $F\in \mathcal{F}$ containing $x\in [n]$ is called the {\it degree} of $x$. Assume that $d_1\geq d_2\geq \ldots\geq d_n$ are the degrees of $\mathcal{F}$ in decreasing order. An important result of Huang and Zhao states that for $n>2k$ the minimum degree $d_n$ is at most $\binom{n-2}{k-2}$. For $n\geq 6k-9$ we strengthen this result by showing $d_{2k+1}\leq \binom{n-2}{k-2}$. As to the second and third largest degrees we prove the best possible bound $d_3\leq d_2\leq \binom{n-2}{k-2}+\binom{n-3}{k-2}$ for $n>2k$. Several more best possible results of a similar nature are established.

Let $n>2r>0$ be integers. We consider families $\mathcal{F}$ of subsets of an $n$-element set, in which the union of any two members has size at most $2r$. One of our results states that for $n\geq 6r$ the number of members of size exceeding $r$ in $\mathcal{F}$ is at most $\binom{n-2}{r-1}$. Another result shows that for $n>3.5r$ the number of sets of size at least $r$ is at most $\binom{n}{r}$. Both bounds are best possible and the latter sharpens the classical Katona Theorem. Similar results are proved for the odd case of the Katona Theorem as well.

The matching number of a $k$-graph is the maximum number of pairwise disjoint edges in it. The $k$-graph is called $t$-resilient if omitting $t$ vertices never decreases its matching number. The complete $k$-graph on $sk+k-1$ vertices has matching number $s$ and it is easily seen to be $(k-1)$-resilient. We conjecture that this is maximal for $k=3$ and $s$ arbitrary. The main result verifies this conjecture for $s=2$. Then Theorem 1.9 provides a considerable improvement on the known upper bounds for $s\geq 3$.

A family $\mathcal{F}$ of spanning trees of the complete graph on $n$ vertices $K_n$ is \emph{$t$-intersecting} if any two members have a forest on $t$ edges in common. We prove an Erdős--Ko--Rado result for $t$-intersecting families of spanning trees of $K_n$. In particular, we show there exists a constant $C > 0$ such that for all $n \geq C (\log n) t$ the largest $t$-intersecting families are the families consisting of all trees that contain a fixed set of $t$ disjoint edges (as well as the stars on $n$ vertices for $t = 1$). The proof uses the spread approximation technique in conjunction with the Lopsided Lovász Local Lemma.

For a family $\mathcal F$ define $ν(\mathcal F,t)$ as the largest $s$ for which there exist $A_1,\ldots, A_{s}\in \mathcal F$ such that for $i\ne j$ we have $|A_i\cap A_j|< t$. What is the largest family $\mathcal F\subset{[n]\choose k}$ with $ν(\mathcal F,t)\le s$? This question goes back to a paper Hajnal and Rothschild from 1973. We show that, for some absolute $C$ and $n>2k+Ct^{4/5}s^{1/5}(k-t)\log_2^4n$, $n>2k+Cs(k-t)\log_2^4 n$ the largest family with $ν(\mathcal F,t)\le s$ has the following structure: there are sets $X_1,\ldots, X_s$ of sizes $t+2x_1,\ldots, t+2x_s$, such that for any $A\in \mathcal F$ there is $i\in [s]$ such that $|A\cap X_i|\ge t+x_i$. That is, the extremal constructions are unions of the extremal constructions in the Complete $t$-Intersection Theorem. For the proof, we enhance the spread approximation technique of Zakharov and the second author. In particular, we introduce the idea of iterative spread approximation.

Given a family $\mathcal{F}\subset 2^{[n]}$ and $1\leq i\neq j\leq n$, we use $\mathcal{F}(\bar{i},j)$ to denote the family $\{F\setminus \{j\}\colon F\in \mathcal{F},\ F\cap \{i,j\}=\{j\}\}$. The sturdiness of $\mathcal{F}$ is defined as the minimum $|\mathcal{F}(\bar{i},j)|$ over all $i,j\in [n]$ with $i\neq j$. It has a very natural algebraic definition as well. In the present paper, we consider the maximum sturdiness of $k$-uniform intersecting families, $k$-uniform $t$-intersecting families and non-uniform $t$-intersecting families. One of the main results shows that for $n\geq 36(k+6)$, an intersecting family $\mathcal{F}\subset \binom{[n]}{k}$ has sturdiness at most $\binom{n-4}{k-3}$, which is best possible.

We study a variant of the Erdős Matching Problem in random hypergraphs. Let $\mathcal{K}_p(n,k)$ denote the Erdős-Rényi random $k$-uniform hypergraph on $n$ vertices where each possible edge is included with probability $p$. We show that when $n\gg k^{2}s$ and $p$ is not too small, with high probability, the maximum number of edges in a sub-hypergraph of $\mathcal{K}_p(n,k)$ with matching number $s$ is obtained by the trivial sub-hypergraphs, i.e. the sub-hypergraph consisting of all edges containing at least one vertex in a fixed set of $s$ vertices.

We consider families, $\mathcal{F}$ of $k$-subsets of an $n$-set. For integers $r\geq 2$, $t\geq 1$, $\mathcal{F}$ is called $r$-wise $t$-intersecting if any $r$ of its members have at least $t$ elements in common. The most natural construction of such a family is the full $t$-star, consisting of all $k$-sets containing a fixed $t$-set. In the case $r=2$ the Exact Erdős-Ko-Rado Theorem shows that the full $t$-star is largest if $n\geq (t+1)(k-t+1)$. In the present paper, we prove that for $n\geq (2.5t)^{1/(r-1)}(k-t)+k$, the full $t$-star is largest in case of $r\geq 3$. Examples show that the exponent $\frac{1}{r-1}$ is best possible. This represents a considerable improvement on a recent result of Balogh and Linz.

Babai and Frankl posed the ``odd cover problem" of finding the minimum cardinality of a collection of complete bipartite graphs such that every edge of the complete graph of order $n$ is covered an odd number of times. In a previous paper with O'Neill, some of the authors proved that this value is always $\lceil n / 2 \rceil$ or $\lceil n / 2 \rceil + 1$ and that it is the former whenever $n$ is a multiple of $8$. In this paper, we determine this value to be $\lceil n / 2 \rceil$ whenever $n$ is odd or equivalent to $18$ modulo $24$. We also further the study of odd covers of graphs which are not complete, wherein edges are covered an odd number of times and nonedges an even number of times by the complete bipartite graphs in the collection. Among various results on disjoint unions, we find the minimum cardinality of an odd cover of a union of odd cliques and of a union of cycles.

Let us consider a collection $\mathcal G$ of codewords of length $n$ over an alphabet of size $s$. Let $t_1,\ldots, t_s$ be nonnegative integers. What is the maximum of $|\mathcal G|$ subject to the condition that any two codewords should have at least $t_i$ positions where both have letter $i$ ($1\le i\le s$). In the case $s=2$ it is a longstanding open question. Quite surprisingly, we obtain an almost complete answer for $s\ge 3$. The main tool is a correlation inequality.

A $k$-uniform family $\mathcal{F}$ is called intersecting if $F\cap F'\neq \emptyset$ for all $F,F'\in \mathcal{F}$. The shadow family $\partial \mathcal{F}$ is the family of $(k-1)$-element sets that are contained in some members of $\mathcal{F}$. The shadow degree (or minimum positive co-degree) of $\mathcal{F}$ is defined as the maximum integer $r$ such that every $E\in \partial \mathcal{F}$ is contained in at least $r$ members of $\mathcal{F}$. In 2021, Balogh, Lemons and Palmer determined the maximum size of an intersecting $k$-uniform family with shadow degree at least $r$ for $n\geq n_0(k,r)$, where $n_0(k,r)$ is doubly exponential in $k$ for $4\leq r\leq k$. In the present paper, we present a short proof of this result for $n\geq 2(r+1)^rk \frac{\binom{2k-1}{k}}{\binom{2r-1}{r}}$ and $4\leq r\leq k$.

There are four non-isomorphic configurations of triples that can form a triangle in a $3$-uniform hypergraph. Forbidding different combinations of these four configurations, fifteen extremal problems can be defined, several of which already appeared in the literature in some different context. Here we systematically study all of these problems solving the new cases exactly or asymptotically. In many cases we also characterize the extremal constructions.