arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Andrew Lott

8 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
Refined upper bounds on Schur-like numbers
For positive integers $r, m$ and $N$, every $r$-coloring of $\{1, \dots, N\}$ contains a monochromatic solution to $x_1+\dots+x_{m+1}=y_1+\dots+y_m$ provided that $N \ge 3^r (r!)^{1/m}$, which is qualitatively optimal when $m$ is logarithmic in $r$.
2026-06-28
The van der Corput property for sums of two squares
Let $S_N=\{1\le d\le N:d=x^2+y^2\text{ for some }x,y\in\mathbb Z\}.$ We prove a power-saving form of the van der Corput property for $S_N$. As a consequence, we obtain a strong Sárközy-type result: if $A\subseteq [N]$ has no nonzero difference equal to a sum of two squares, then $|A|\ll_\varepsilon N^{7/8+\varepsilon}$ for every $ε>0$, improving upon an earlier quasipolynomial bound due to Rice. The shape of this bound is optimal, as a construction of Younis yields a set $A\subseteq [N]$ with $|A|\gg N^{1/2}$ such that $(A-A)\cap S_N=\emptyset$.
Extensions of the Furstenberg-Sárközy theorem via the arithmetic level-$d$ inequality
Very recently, Green and Sawhney obtained a quasipolynomial bound in the Furstenberg--Sárközy theorem for square differences by proving an ''arithmetic level-$d$'' inequality, thereby yielding a greatly improved density increment scheme. We adapt their method to general intersective polynomials $h\in\mathbb{Z}[x]$ and obtain an analogous quasipolynomial upper bound for the largest subset of $\{1,2,\dots,X\}$ whose difference set contains no nonzero element of the form $h(n)$ with $n\in \mathbb{Z}$. This is the best quantitative upper bound presently known for sets lacking intersective polynomial differences. In contrast to the square case, extending the method to general intersective polynomials requires performing a density increment iteration in which the underlying polynomial changes at each step; a key contribution of this paper is to show that the arithmetic level-$d$ inequality remains effective uniformly across all auxiliary polynomials arising in the iteration. We also develop smoothly weighted versions of the exponential sum estimates of Rice.
Notes and computations on forbidden differences
We explore from several perspectives the following question: given $X\subseteq \mathbb{Z}$ and $N\in \mathbb{N}$, what is the maximum size $D(X,N)$ of $A\subseteq \{1,2,\dots,N\}$ before $A$ is forced to contain two distinct elements that differ by an element of $X$? The set of forbidden differences, $X$, is called \textit{intersective} if $D(X,N)=o(N)$, with the most well-studied examples being $X=S=\{n^2: n\in \mathbb{N}\}$ and $X=\mathcal{P}-1=\{p-1: p\text{ prime}\}$. In addition to some new results, including exact formulas and estimates for $D(X,N)$ in some non-intersective cases like $X=\mathcal{P}$ and $X=S+k$, $k\in \mathbb{N}$, we also provide a comprehensive survey of known bounds and extensive computational data. In particular, we utilize an existing algorithm for finding maximum cliques in graphs to determine $D(S,N)$ for $N\leq 300$ and $D(\mathcal{P}-1,N)$ for $N\leq 500$. None of these exact values appear previously in the literature.
2025-05-23
Polynomial progressions in the generalized twin primes
By Maynard's theorem and the subsequent improvements by the Polymath Project, there exists a positive integer $b\leq 246$ such that there are infinitely many primes $p$ such that $p+b$ is also prime. Let $P_1,...,P_t\in \mathbb{Z}[y]$ with $P_1(0)=\cdots=P_t(0)=0$. We use the transference argument of Tao and Ziegler to prove there exist positive integers $x, y,$ and $b \leq 246 $ such that $x+P_1(y),x+P_2(y),...,x+P_t(y)$ and $x+P_1(y)+b,x+P_2(y)+b,...,x+P_t(y)+b$ are all prime. Our work is inspired by Pintz, who proved a similar result for the special case of arithmetic progressions.
The sum-product problem for small sets
Published in Involve 18 (2025) 165-180 • View PublicationBIB
For $A\subseteq \mathbb{R}$, let $A+A=\{a+b: a,b\in A\}$ and $AA=\{ab: a,b\in A\}$. For $k\in \mathbb{N}$, let $SP(k)$ denote the minimum value of $\max\{|A+A|, |AA|\}$ over all $A\subseteq \mathbb{N}$ with $|A|=k$. Here we establish $SP(k)=3k-3$ for $2\leq k \leq 7$, the $k=7$ case achieved for example by $\{1,2,3,4,6,8,12\}$, while $SP(k)=3k-2$ for $k=8,9$, the $k=9$ case achieved for example by $\{1,2,3,4,6,8,9,12,16\}$. For $4\leq k \leq 7$, we provide two proofs using different applications of Freiman's $3k-4$ theorem; one of the proofs includes extensive case analysis on the product sets of $k$-element subsets of $(2k-3)$-term arithmetic progressions. For $k=8,9$, we apply Freiman's $3k-3$ theorem for product sets, and investigate the sumset of the union of two geometric progressions with the same common ratio $r>1$, with separate treatments of the overlapping cases $r\neq 2$ and $r\geq 2$.
2021-12-06 v4
Schur's theorem in integer lattices
Published in Involve 15 (2022) 857-884 • Search Publication
A standard proof of Schur's Theorem yields that any $r$-coloring of $\{1,2,\dots,R_r-1\}$ yields a monochromatic solution to $x+y=z$, where $R_r$ is the classical $r$-color Ramsey number, the minimum $N$ such that any $r$-coloring of a complete graph on $N$ vertices yields a monochromatic triangle. We explore generalizations and modifications of this result in higher dimensional integer lattices, showing in particular that if $k\geq d+1$, then any $r$-coloring of $\{1,2,\dots,R_r(k)^d-1\}^d$ yields a monochromatic solution to $x_1+\cdots+x_{k-1}=x_k$ with $\{x_1,\dots,x_d\}$ linearly independent, where $R_r(k)$ is the analogous Ramsey number in which triangles are replaced by complete graphs on $k$ vertices. We also obtain computational results and examples in the case $d=2$, $k=3$, and $r\in\{2,3,4\}$.
The pigenhole principle and multicolor Ramsey numbers
Published • View PublicationBIB
For integers $k,r\geq 2$, the diagonal Ramsey number $R_r(k)$ is the minimum $N\in\mathbb{N}$ such that every $r$-coloring of the edges of a complete graph on $N$ vertices yields on a monochromatic subgraph on $k$ vertices. Here we make a careful effort of extracting explicit upper bounds for $R_r(k)$ from the pigeonhole principle alone. Our main term improves on previously documented explicit bounds for $r\geq 3$, and we also consider an often ignored secondary term, which allows us to subtract a uniformly bounded below positive proportion of the main term. Asymptotically, we give a self-contained proof that $R_r(k)\leq \left(\frac{3+e}{2}\right)\frac{(r(k-2))!}{((k-2)!)^r}(1+o_{r\to \infty}(1)),$ and we conclude by noting that our methods combine with previous estimates on $R_r(3)$ to improve the constant $\frac{3+e}{2}$ to $\frac{3+e}{2}-\frac{d}{48}$, where $d=66-R_4(3)\geq 4$. We also compare our formulas, and previously documented formulas, to some collected numerical data.