arXiv++ Combinatorics

We establish that every set of $k=10$ natural numbers determines at least $30$ distinct pairwise sums or at least $30$ distinct pairwise products, as well as the analogous result for $k=11$ and at least $34$ sums/products, with sharpness exhibited by $\{1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 16, 18\}$ and $\{1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 16, 18, 24\}$, respectively. This extends previous work of the fifth author with Clevenger, Havard, Heard, Lott, and Wilson, which established the corresponding thresholds for $k\leq 9$. Included is a classification result for sets of $10$ real numbers (resp. positive real numbers) determining at most $29$ pairwise sums (resp. pairwise products) that do not contain $8$ elements of any single arithmetic progression (resp. geometric progression), as well as some observations controlling additive quadruples in small subsets of two-dimensional generalized geometric progressions.

We explore from several perspectives the following question: given $X\subseteq \mathbb{Z}$ and $N\in \mathbb{N}$, what is the maximum size $D(X,N)$ of $A\subseteq \{1,2,\dots,N\}$ before $A$ is forced to contain two distinct elements that differ by an element of $X$? The set of forbidden differences, $X$, is called \textit{intersective} if $D(X,N)=o(N)$, with the most well-studied examples being $X=S=\{n^2: n\in \mathbb{N}\}$ and $X=\mathcal{P}-1=\{p-1: p\text{ prime}\}$. In addition to some new results, including exact formulas and estimates for $D(X,N)$ in some non-intersective cases like $X=\mathcal{P}$ and $X=S+k$, $k\in \mathbb{N}$, we also provide a comprehensive survey of known bounds and extensive computational data. In particular, we utilize an existing algorithm for finding maximum cliques in graphs to determine $D(S,N)$ for $N\leq 300$ and $D(\mathcal{P}-1,N)$ for $N\leq 500$. None of these exact values appear previously in the literature.

The Seidel matrix of a tournament on $n$ players is an $n\times n$ skew-symmetric matrix with entries in $\{0, 1, -1\}$ that encapsulates the outcomes of the games in the given tournament. It is known that the determinant of an $n\times n$ Seidel matrix is $0$ if $n$ is odd, and is an odd perfect square if $n$ is even. This leads to the study of the set \[ \mathcal{D}(n)= \{ \sqrt{\det S}: \mbox{ $S$ is an $n\times n$ Seidel matrix}\}. \] This paper studies various questions about $\mathcal{D}(n)$. It is shown that $\mathcal{D}(n)$ is a proper subset of $\mathcal{D}(n+2)$ for every positive even integer, and every odd integer in the interval $[1, 1+n^2/2]$ is in $\mathcal{D}(n)$ for $n$ even. The expected value and variance of $\det S$ over the $n\times n$ Seidel matrices chosen uniformly at random is determined, and upper bounds on $\max \mathcal{D}(n)$ are given, and related to the Hadamard conjecture. Finally, it is shown that for infinitely many $n$, $\mathcal{D}(n)$ contains a gap (that is, there are odd integers $k<\ell <m$ such that $k, m \in \mathcal{D}(n)$ but $\ell \notin \mathcal{D}(n)$) and several properties of the characteristic polynomials of Seidel matrices are established.

We establish upper bounds on the size of the largest subset of $\{1,2,\dots,N\}$ lacking nonzero differences of the form $h(p_1,\dots,p_{\ell})$, where $h\in \mathbb{Z}[x_1,\dots,x_{\ell}]$ is a fixed polynomial satisfying appropriate conditions and $p_1,\dots,p_{\ell}$ are prime. The bounds are of the same type as the best-known analogs for unrestricted integer inputs, due to Bloom-Maynard and Arala for $\ell=1$, and to the authors for $\ell \geq 2$.

For $A\subseteq \mathbb{R}$, let $A+A=\{a+b: a,b\in A\}$ and $AA=\{ab: a,b\in A\}$. For $k\in \mathbb{N}$, let $SP(k)$ denote the minimum value of $\max\{|A+A|, |AA|\}$ over all $A\subseteq \mathbb{N}$ with $|A|=k$. Here we establish $SP(k)=3k-3$ for $2\leq k \leq 7$, the $k=7$ case achieved for example by $\{1,2,3,4,6,8,12\}$, while $SP(k)=3k-2$ for $k=8,9$, the $k=9$ case achieved for example by $\{1,2,3,4,6,8,9,12,16\}$. For $4\leq k \leq 7$, we provide two proofs using different applications of Freiman's $3k-4$ theorem; one of the proofs includes extensive case analysis on the product sets of $k$-element subsets of $(2k-3)$-term arithmetic progressions. For $k=8,9$, we apply Freiman's $3k-3$ theorem for product sets, and investigate the sumset of the union of two geometric progressions with the same common ratio $r>1$, with separate treatments of the overlapping cases $r\neq 2$ and $r\geq 2$.

A standard proof of Schur's Theorem yields that any $r$-coloring of $\{1,2,\dots,R_r-1\}$ yields a monochromatic solution to $x+y=z$, where $R_r$ is the classical $r$-color Ramsey number, the minimum $N$ such that any $r$-coloring of a complete graph on $N$ vertices yields a monochromatic triangle. We explore generalizations and modifications of this result in higher dimensional integer lattices, showing in particular that if $k\geq d+1$, then any $r$-coloring of $\{1,2,\dots,R_r(k)^d-1\}^d$ yields a monochromatic solution to $x_1+\cdots+x_{k-1}=x_k$ with $\{x_1,\dots,x_d\}$ linearly independent, where $R_r(k)$ is the analogous Ramsey number in which triangles are replaced by complete graphs on $k$ vertices. We also obtain computational results and examples in the case $d=2$, $k=3$, and $r\in\{2,3,4\}$.

For integers $k,r\geq 2$, the diagonal Ramsey number $R_r(k)$ is the minimum $N\in\mathbb{N}$ such that every $r$-coloring of the edges of a complete graph on $N$ vertices yields on a monochromatic subgraph on $k$ vertices. Here we make a careful effort of extracting explicit upper bounds for $R_r(k)$ from the pigeonhole principle alone. Our main term improves on previously documented explicit bounds for $r\geq 3$, and we also consider an often ignored secondary term, which allows us to subtract a uniformly bounded below positive proportion of the main term. Asymptotically, we give a self-contained proof that $R_r(k)\leq \left(\frac{3+e}{2}\right)\frac{(r(k-2))!}{((k-2)!)^r}(1+o_{r\to \infty}(1)),$ and we conclude by noting that our methods combine with previous estimates on $R_r(3)$ to improve the constant $\frac{3+e}{2}$ to $\frac{3+e}{2}-\frac{d}{48}$, where $d=66-R_4(3)\geq 4$. We also compare our formulas, and previously documented formulas, to some collected numerical data.

For $\ell\geq 2$ and $h\in \mathbb{Z}[x_1,\dots,x_{\ell}]$ of degree $k\geq 2$, we show that every set $A\subseteq \{1,2,\dots,N\}$ lacking nonzero differences in $h(\mathbb{Z}^{\ell})$ satisfies $|A|\ll_h Ne^{-c(\log N)^μ}$, where $c=c(h)>0$, $μ=[(k-1)^2+1]^{-1}$ if $\ell=2$, and $μ=1/2$ if $\ell\geq 3$, provided $h(\mathbb{Z}^{\ell})$ contains a multiple of every natural number and $h$ satisfies certain nonsingularity conditions. We also explore these conditions in detail, drawing on a variety of tools from algebraic geometry.

We begin by revisiting a paper of Erdős and Fishburn, which posed the following question: given $k\in \mathbb{N}$, what is the maximum number of points in a plane that determine at most $k$ distinct distances, and can such optimal configurations be classified? We rigorously verify claims made in remarks in that paper, including the fact that the vertices of a regular polygon, with or without an additional point at the center, cannot form an optimal configuration for any $k\geq 7$. Further, we investigate configurations in both triangular and rectangular lattices studied by Erdős and Fishburn. We collect a large amount of data related to these and other configurations, some of which correct errors in the original paper, and we use that data and additional analysis to provide explanations and make conjectures.

We address an analog of a problem introduced by Erdős and Fishburn, itself an inverse formulation of the famous Erdős distance problem, in which the usual Euclidean distance is replaced with the metric induced by the $\ell^1$-norm, commonly referred to as the $\textit{taxicab metric}$. Specifically, we investigate the following question: given $d,k\in \mathbb{N}$, what is the maximum size of a subset of $\mathbb{R}^d$ that determines at most $k$ distinct taxicab distances, and can all such optimal arrangements be classified? We completely resolve the question in dimension $d=2$, as well as the $k=1$ case in dimension $d=3$, and we also provide a full resolution in the general case under an additional hypothesis.

For any $d\in \mathbb{N}$ and any function $f:(0,\infty)\to [0,1]$ with $f(R)\to 0$ as $R\to \infty$, we construct a set $A \subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$ and a sequence $R_n \to \infty$ such that $\|x-y\| \neq R_n$ for all $x,y\in A$ and $μ(A\cap B_{R_n})\geq f(R_n)μ(B_{R_n})$ for all $n\in \mathbb{N}$, where $B_R$ is the ball of radius $R$ centered at the origin and $μ$ is Lebesgue measure. This construction exhibits a form of sharpness for a result established independently by Furstenberg-Katznelson-Weiss, Bourgain, and Falconer-Marstrand, and it generalizes to any metric induced by a norm on $\mathbb{R}^d$.

We show that if $h(x,y)=ax^2+bxy+cy^2\in \mathbb{Z}[x,y]$ satisfies $Δ(h)=b^2-4ac\neq 0$, then any subset of $\{1,2,\dots,N\}$ lacking nonzero differences in the image of $h$ has size at most a constant depending on $h$ times $N\exp(-c\sqrt{\log N})$, where $c=c(h)>0$. We achieve this goal by adapting an $L^2$ density increment strategy previously used to establish analogous results for sums of one or more single-variable polynomials. Our exposition is thorough and self-contained, in order to serve as an accessible gateway for readers who are unfamiliar with previous implementations of these techniques.

We show that if $h\in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ is a polynomial of degree $k \geq 2$ such that $h(\mathbb{N})$ contains a multiple of $q$ for every $q\in \mathbb{N}$, known as an $\textit{intersective polynomial}$, then any subset of $\{1,2,\dots,N\}$ with no nonzero differences of the form $h(n)$ for $n\in\mathbb{N}$ has density at most a constant depending on $h$ and $c$ times $(\log N)^{-c\log\log\log\log N}$, for any $c<(\log((k^2+k)/2))^{-1}$. Bounds of this type were previously known only for monomials and intersective quadratics, and this is currently the best-known bound for the original Furstenberg-Sárközy Theorem, i.e. $h(n)=n^2$. The intersective condition is necessary to force any density decay for polynomial difference-free sets, and in that sense our result is the maximal extension of this particular quantitative estimate. Further, we show that if $g,h\in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ are intersective, then any set lacking nonzero differences of the form $g(m)+h(n)$ for $m,n\in \mathbb{N}$ has density at most $\exp(-c(\log N)^μ)$, where $c=c(g,h)>0$, $μ=μ(\text{deg}(g),\text{deg}(h))>0$, and $μ(2,2)=1/2$. We also include a brief discussion of sums of three or more polynomials in the final section.

We provide upper bounds on the largest subsets of $\{1,2,\dots,N\}$ with no differences of the form $h_1(n_1)+\cdots+h_{\ell}(n_{\ell})$ with $n_i\in \mathbb{N}$ or $h_1(p_1)+\cdots+h_{\ell}(p_{\ell})$ with $p_i$ prime, where $h_i\in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ lie in in the classes of so-called intersective and $\mathcal{P}$-intersective polynomials, respectively. For example, we show that a subset of $\{1,2,\dots,N\}$ free of nonzero differences of the form $n^j+m^k$ for fixed $j,k\in \mathbb{N}$ has density at most $e^{-(\log N)^μ}$ for some $μ=μ(j,k)>0$. Our results, obtained by adapting two Fourier analytic, circle method-driven strategies, either recover or improve upon all previous results for a single polynomial. UPDATE: While the results and proofs in this preprint are correct, the main result (Theorem 1.1) has been superseded prior to publication by a new paper ( https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.01760 ) that provides better results with considerably less technicality, to which the interested reader should refer.

In this short note, we closely follow the approach of Green and Tao to extend the best known bound for recurrence modulo 1 from squares to the largest possible class of polynomials. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of a consequence of this result for polynomials structures in sumsets and limitations of the method.

Using purely combinatorial means we obtain results on simultaneous Diophantine approximation modulo 1 for systems of polynomials with real coefficients and no constant term.

We define a necessary and sufficient condition on a polynomial $h\in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ to guarantee that every set of natural numbers of positive upper density contains a nonzero difference of the form $h(p)$ for some prime $p$. Moreover, we establish a quantitative estimate on the size of the largest subset of ${1,2,\dots,N}$ which lacks the desired arithmetic structure, showing that if deg$(h)=k$, then the density of such a set is at most a constant times $(\log N)^{-c}$ for any $c<1/(2k-2)$. We also discuss how an improved version of this result for $k=2$ and a relative version in the primes can be obtained with some additional known methods.

We extend the best known bound on the largest subset of {1,2,...,N} with no square differences to the largest possible class of quadratic polynomials.