arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Annika Heckel

12 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
Sharp Thresholds for Factors in Random Graphs
Let $F$ be a graph on $r$ vertices and let $G$ be a graph on $n$ vertices. Then an $F$-factor in $G$ is a subgraph of $G$ composed of $n/r$ vertex-disjoint copies of $F$, if $r$ divides $n$. In other words, an $F$-factor yields a partition of the $n$ vertices of $G$. The study of such $F$-factors in the Erdős-Rényi random graph dates back to Erdős himself. Decades later, in 2008, Johansson, Kahn and Vu established the thresholds for the existence of an $F$-factor for strictly 1-balanced $F$ -- up to the leading constant. The sharp thresholds, meaning the leading constants, were obtained only recently by Riordan and Heckel, but only for complete graphs $F=K_r$ and for so-called nice graphs. Their results rely on sophisticated couplings that utilize the recent, celebrated solution of Shamir's problem by Kahn. We extend the couplings by Riordan and Heckel to any strictly 1-balanced $F$ and thereby obtain the sharp threshold for the existence of an $F$-factor. In particular, we confirm the thirty year old conjecture by Rucínski that this sharp threshold indeed coincides with the sharp threshold for the disappearance of the last vertices which are not contained in a copy of $F$.
2024-09-26 v2
The difference between the chromatic and the cochromatic number of a random graph
The cochromatic number $ζ(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum number of colours needed for a vertex colouring where every colour class is either an independent set or a clique. Let $χ(G)$ denote the usual chromatic number. Around 1991 Erdős and Gimbel asked: For the random graph $G \sim G_{n, 1/2}$, does $χ(G)-ζ(G) \rightarrow \infty$ whp? Erdős offered \$100 for a positive and \$1,000 for a negative answer. We give a positive answer to this question for roughly 95% of all values $n$.
2024-08-25 v2
On a question of Erdős and Gimbel on the cochromatic number
Published in Electron. J. Comb. 31(4), P4.72, 2024 • View PublicationBIB
In this note, we show that the difference between the chromatic and the cochromatic number of the random graph $G_{n,1/2}$ is not whp bounded by $n^{1/2-o(1)}$, addressing a question of Erdős and Gimbel.
2023-06-12 v3
Colouring random graphs: Tame colourings
Given a graph G, a colouring is an assignment of colours to the vertices of G so that no two adjacent vertices are coloured the same. If all colour classes have size at most t, then we call the colouring t-bounded, and the t-bounded chromatic number of G, denoted by $χ_t(G)$, is the minimum number of colours in such a colouring. Every colouring of G is then $α(G)$-bounded, where $α(G)$ denotes the size of a largest independent set. We study colourings of the random graph G(n, 1/2) and of the corresponding uniform random graph G(n,m) with $m=\left \lfloor \frac 12 {n \choose 2} \right \rfloor$. We show that $χ_t(G(n,m))$ is maximally concentrated on at most two explicit values for $t = α(G(n,m))-2$. This behaviour stands in stark contrast to that of the normal chromatic number, which was recently shown not to be concentrated on any sequence of intervals of length $n^{1/2-o(1)}$. Moreover, when $t = α(G_{n, 1/2})-1$ and if the expected number of independent sets of size $t$ is not too small, we determine an explicit interval of length $n^{0.99}$ that contains $χ_t(G_{n,1/2})$ with high probability. Both results have profound consequences: the former is at the core of the intriguing Zigzag Conjecture on the distribution of $χ(G_{n, 1/2})$ and justifies one of its main hypotheses, while the latter is an important ingredient in the proof of a non-concentration result for $χ(G_{n,1/2})$ that is conjectured to be optimal. These two results are consequences of a more general statement. We consider a class of colourings that we call tame, and provide tight bounds for the probability of existence of such colourings via a delicate second moment argument. We then apply those bounds to the two aforementioned cases. As a further consequence of our main result, we prove two-point concentration of the equitable chromatic number of G(n,m).
The hitting time of clique factors
In a recent paper, Kahn gave the strongest possible, affirmative, answer to Shamir's problem, which had been open since the late 1970s: Let $r \ge 3 $ and let $n$ be divisible by $r$. Then, in the random $r$-uniform hypergraph process on $n$ vertices, as soon as the last isolated vertex disappears, a perfect matching emerges. In the present work, we transfer this hitting time result to the setting of clique factors in the random graph process: At the time that the last vertex joins a copy of the complete graph $K_r$, the random graph process contains a $K_r$-factor. Our proof draws on a novel sequence of couplings, extending techniques of Riordan and the first author. An analogous result is proved for clique factors in the $s$-uniform hypergraph process ($s \ge 3$).
2021-03-25 v3
How does the chromatic number of a random graph vary?
Published in J. London Math. Soc.(2) 2023, 1-47 • View PublicationBIB
How does the chromatic number of a graph chosen uniformly at random from all graphs on $n$ vertices behave? This quantity is a random variable, so one can ask (i) for upper and lower bounds on its typical values, and (ii) for bounds on how much it varies: what is the width (e.g., standard deviation) of its distribution? On (i) there has been considerable progress over the last 45 years; on (ii), which is our focus here, remarkably little. One would like both upper and lower bounds on the width of the distribution, and ideally a description of the (appropriately scaled) limiting distribution. There is a well known upper bound of Shamir and Spencer of order $\sqrt{n}$, improved slightly by Alon to $\sqrt{n}/\log n$, but no non-trivial lower bound was known until 2019, when the first author proved that the width is at least $n^{1/4-o(1)}$ for infinitely many $n$, answering a longstanding question of Bollobás. In this paper we have two main aims: first, we shall prove a much stronger lower bound on the width. We shall show unconditionally that, for some values of $n$, the width is at least $n^{1/2-o(1)}$, matching the upper bounds up to the error term. Moreover, conditional on a recently announced sharper explicit estimate for the chromatic number, we improve the lower bound to order $\sqrt{n} \log \log n /\log^3 n$, within a logarithmic factor of the upper bound. Secondly, we will describe a number of conjectures as to what the true behaviour of the variation in $χ(G_{n,1/2})$ is, and why. The first form of this conjecture arises from recent work of Bollobás, Heckel, Morris, Panagiotou, Riordan and Smith. We will also give much more detailed conjectures, suggesting that the true width, for the worst case $n$, matches our lower bound up to a constant factor. These conjectures also predict a Gaussian limiting distribution.
2019-06-27 v2
Non-concentration of the chromatic number of a random graph
Published in J. Amer. Math. Soc. 34 (2021), 245-260 • View PublicationBIB
We show that the chromatic number of $G_{n, \frac 12}$ is not concentrated on fewer than $n^{\frac 14 - \varepsilon}$ consecutive values. This addresses a longstanding question raised by Erdős and several other authors.
2018-02-23 v2
Random triangles in random graphs
Published • View PublicationBIB
In a recent paper, Oliver Riordan shows that for $r \ge 4$ and $p$ up to and slightly larger than the threshold for a $K_r$-factor, the hypergraph formed by the copies of $K_r$ in $G(n,p)$ contains a copy of the binomial random hypergraph $H=H_r(n,π)$ with $π\sim p^{r \choose 2}$. For $r=3$, he gives a slightly weaker result where the density in the random hypergraph is reduced by a constant factor. Recently, Jeff Kahn announced an asymptotically sharp bound for the threshold in Shamir's hypergraph matching problem for all $r \ge 3$. With Riordan's result, this immediately implies an asymptotically sharp bound for the threshold of a $K_r$-factor in $G(n,p)$ for $r \ge 4$. In this note, we resolve the missing case $r=3$ by modifying Riordan's argument. This means that Kahn's result also implies a sharp bound for triangle factors in $G(n,p)$.
2017-12-20
Sharp concentration of the equitable chromatic number of dense random graphs
Published in Combinatorics, Probability and Computing , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , March 2020 , pp. 213 - 233 • View PublicationBIB
An equitable colouring of a graph $G$ is a colouring of the vertices of $G$ so that no two adjacent vertices are coloured the same and, additionally, the colour class sizes differ by at most $1$. The equitable chromatic number $χ_=(G)$ is the minimum number of colours required for this. We study the equitable chromatic number of the dense random graph $G(n,m)$, where $m = \left\lfloor p {n \choose 2} \right \rfloor $ and $0<p< 0.86$ is constant. It is a well-known question of Bollobás whether for $p=1/2$ there is a function $f(n) \rightarrow \infty$ so that for any sequence of intervals of length $f(n)$, the normal chromatic number of $G(n,m)$ lies outside the intervals with probability at least $1/2$ if $n$ is large enough. Bollobás proposes that this is likely to hold for $f(n) = \log n$. We show that for the \emph{equitable} chromatic number, the answer to the analogous question is negative. In fact, there is a subsequence $(n_j)_{j}$ of the integers where $χ_=(G(n_j,m_j)) = n/j$ with high probability, i.e., $χ_=(G(n_j,m_j))$ is concentrated on exactly one explicitly known value. This constitutes surprisingly narrow concentration since in this range the equitable chromatic number, like the normal chromatic number, is rather large in absolute value, namely asymptotically equal to $n / (2\log_b n)$ where $b=1/(1-p)$.
2016-03-15 v3
The chromatic number of dense random graphs
Published in Random Structures and Algorithms 53(1), 140-182, 2018 • View PublicationBIB
The chromatic number $χ(G)$ of a graph $G$ is defined as the minimum number of colours required for a vertex colouring where no two adjacent vertices are coloured the same. The chromatic number of the dense random graph $G \sim G(n,p)$ where $p \in (0,1)$ is constant has been intensively studied since the 1970s, and a landmark result by Bollobás in 1987 first established the asymptotic value of $χ(G)$. Despite several improvements of this result, the exact value of $χ(G)$ remains open. In this paper, new upper and lower bounds for $χ(G)$ are established. These bounds are the first ones that match each other up to a term of size $o(1)$ in the denominator: they narrow down the colouring rate $n/χ(G)$ of $G \sim G(n,p)$ to an explicit interval of length $o(1)$, answering a question of Kang and McDiarmid.
2013-07-29
On the threshold for rainbow connection number r in random graphs
Published in Graphs and Combinatorics 32 (2016), Issue 1, pp 161-174 • View PublicationBIB
We call an edge colouring of a graph G a rainbow colouring if every pair of vertices is joined by a rainbow path, i.e., a path where no two edges have the same colour. The minimum number of colours required for a rainbow colouring of the edges of G is called the rainbow connection number (or rainbow connectivity) rc(G) of G. We investigate sharp thresholds in the Erdős-Rényi random graph for the property "rc(G) <= r" where r is a fixed integer. It is known that for r=2, rainbow connection number 2 and diameter 2 happen essentially at the same time in random graphs. For r >= 3, we conjecture that this is not the case, propose an alternative threshold, and prove that this is an upper bound for the threshold for rainbow connection number r.
2012-09-13
The hitting time of rainbow connection number two
Published in Electronic J. Combinatorics 19 (2012), Issue 4, P37 • View PublicationBIB
In a graph $G$ with a given edge colouring, a rainbow path is a path all of whose edges have distinct colours. The minimum number of colours required to colour the edges of $G$ so that every pair of vertices is joined by at least one rainbow path is called the rainbow connection number $rc(G)$ of the graph $G$. For any graph $G$, $rc(G) \ge diam(G)$. We will show that for the Erdős-Rényi random graph $G(n,p)$ close to the diameter 2 threshold, with high probability if $diam(G)=2$ then $rc(G)=2$. In fact, further strengthening this result, we will show that in the random graph process, with high probability the hitting times of diameter 2 and of rainbow connection number 2 coincide.