arXiv++ Combinatorics

The celebrated (homological) nerve theorem makes use of spectral sequences to determine the homology of a space. However, this theorem cannot effectively compute the homology in every circumstance. In this paper, we develop an effective version of the nerve theorem. Our theorem enables us to compute the homology of a simplicial complex explicitly using the combinatorial information of its subcomplexes and their non-trivial intersections using discrete Morse theory. Suppose $X$ is a simplicial complex with subcomplexes $A_1, A_2, \dots ,A_k$ such that $X= \cup_{i=1}^{k}A_i$. Then the main theorem of this paper states that we can explicitly compute the homology of $X$ using the information of given gradient vector fields on $A_i$ for each $i \in [k]$, and on their possible non-trivial intersections. Our approach is purely combinatorial, in the sense that it does not involve any notions of geometric realization, continuity or homotopy.

In this paper, we introduce the notion of Pfaffian orientations on (punctured) polygonally cellulated orientable surfaces, and provide an expression for the number of such orientations. This generalizes the notion of Pfaffian orientations on planar graph, where a planar graph is seen as a punctured $2$-sphere, embedded in $\mathbb{R}^3$. So, as a direct corollary of our main theorem, we derive the number of Pfaffian orientations on a planar graph.

The Mayer-Vietoris theorem is known for its wide applications, especially in determining homology. In fact, this theorem provides us with a long exact sequence, where the underlying homology groups fit in. However, this theorem does not provide an explicit way to compute homology. In this paper we prove an ``effective" version of the Mayer-Vietoris theorem using discrete Morse theory. Suppose, we have a Mayer-Vietoris type setup, i.e., let $X$ be a simplicial complex and $A$ and $B$ be two subcomplexes of $X$, such that $A \cup B=X$. Moreover, let $\mathcal{W}_A$, $\mathcal{W}_{B}$ and $\mathcal{W}_{A \cap B}$ be gradient vector fields on $A$, $B$ and $A \cap B$ respectively (which need not be ``coherent", i.e., they do not need to coincide on their intersection). Then, the main theorem of our paper provides an explicit way to compute the homology groups of $X$, using the combinatorial information regarding the trajectories of the aforementioned gradient vector fields, we do not even need to know the individual homology groups $H_{*}(A)$, $H_{*}(B)$ and $H_{*}(A \cap B)$. In principle, the homology of $X$ can always be computed explicitly using our theorem irrespective of the choice of the gradient vector fields. Further, if we choose the subcomplexes $A$ and $B$ wisely so that each of $A$, $B$ and $A \cap B$ admits an efficient gradient vector field, then the computation of the homology groups is considerably reduced.