arXiv++ Combinatorics

The celebrated (homological) nerve theorem makes use of spectral sequences to determine the homology of a space. However, this theorem cannot effectively compute the homology in every circumstance. In this paper, we develop an effective version of the nerve theorem. Our theorem enables us to compute the homology of a simplicial complex explicitly using the combinatorial information of its subcomplexes and their non-trivial intersections using discrete Morse theory. Suppose $X$ is a simplicial complex with subcomplexes $A_1, A_2, \dots ,A_k$ such that $X= \cup_{i=1}^{k}A_i$. Then the main theorem of this paper states that we can explicitly compute the homology of $X$ using the information of given gradient vector fields on $A_i$ for each $i \in [k]$, and on their possible non-trivial intersections. Our approach is purely combinatorial, in the sense that it does not involve any notions of geometric realization, continuity or homotopy.

In this paper, we introduce the notion of Pfaffian orientations on (punctured) polygonally cellulated orientable surfaces, and provide an expression for the number of such orientations. This generalizes the notion of Pfaffian orientations on planar graph, where a planar graph is seen as a punctured $2$-sphere, embedded in $\mathbb{R}^3$. So, as a direct corollary of our main theorem, we derive the number of Pfaffian orientations on a planar graph.

We obtain a higher dimensional analogue of a classical theorem which states that a polygonally cellulated $2$-sphere in $\mathbb{R}^3$, such that each vertex has even degree, is $2$-face-colourable. In order to formulate our result, we introduce the notion of combinatorially sphere-like ranked posets, which are ranked posets that generalise combinatorial spheres. We prove that, in a combinatorially sphere-like ranked poset $S$ of rank $k$, if each element of rank $(k-2)$ is covered by an even number of elements, then the maximum ranked elements of $S$ admit a proper $2$-colouring, i.e., any two adjacent maximum ranked elements have different colours.

The Mayer-Vietoris theorem is known for its wide applications, especially in determining homology. In fact, this theorem provides us with a long exact sequence, where the underlying homology groups fit in. However, this theorem does not provide an explicit way to compute homology. In this paper we prove an ``effective" version of the Mayer-Vietoris theorem using discrete Morse theory. Suppose, we have a Mayer-Vietoris type setup, i.e., let $X$ be a simplicial complex and $A$ and $B$ be two subcomplexes of $X$, such that $A \cup B=X$. Moreover, let $\mathcal{W}_A$, $\mathcal{W}_{B}$ and $\mathcal{W}_{A \cap B}$ be gradient vector fields on $A$, $B$ and $A \cap B$ respectively (which need not be ``coherent", i.e., they do not need to coincide on their intersection). Then, the main theorem of our paper provides an explicit way to compute the homology groups of $X$, using the combinatorial information regarding the trajectories of the aforementioned gradient vector fields, we do not even need to know the individual homology groups $H_{*}(A)$, $H_{*}(B)$ and $H_{*}(A \cap B)$. In principle, the homology of $X$ can always be computed explicitly using our theorem irrespective of the choice of the gradient vector fields. Further, if we choose the subcomplexes $A$ and $B$ wisely so that each of $A$, $B$ and $A \cap B$ admits an efficient gradient vector field, then the computation of the homology groups is considerably reduced.

Combinatorial analogues of classical Borsuk-Ulam-type theorems (e.g., Tucker's lemma, $\mathbb{Z}_p$-Tucker's lemma, etc.) have numerous important applications in combinatorics. In this paper, we formulate a combinatorial degree version of a generalized $\mathbb{Z}_p$-Tucker's lemma. Our proof is purely combinatorial in the sense that it does not involve homology, cohomology or any other notions from continuous topology. In order to prove the aforementioned degree theorem, as a main technical tool, we prove a Hopf trace-type formula, which is also purely combinatorial and involves no homology. This combinatorial Hopf trace formula is of independent interest.

Discrete Morse theory helps us compute the homology groups of simplicial complexes in an efficient manner. A "good" gradient vector field reduces the number of critical simplices, simplifying the homology calculations by reducing them to the computation of homology groups of a simpler chain complex. This homology computation hinges on an efficient enumeration of gradient trajectories. The technique of cancelling pairs of critical simplices reduces the number of critical simplices, though it also perturbs the gradient trajectories. In this article, we demonstrate that (the matrix of) a certain modified boundary operator of interest can be derived from the corresponding original boundary operator through a sequence of elementary row operations. Thus, it eliminates the need of enumeration of the new gradient trajectories. We also obtain a similar result for coboundary operators.

Robin Forman's highly influential 2002 paper A User's Guide to Discrete Morse Theory presents an overview of the subject in a very readable manner. As a proof of concept, the author determines the topology (homotopy type) of the abstract simplicial complex of disconnected graphs of order $n$ (which was previously done by Victor Vassiliev using classical topological methods) using discrete Morse theoretic techniques, which are purely combinatorial in nature. The techniques involve the construction (and verification) of a discrete gradient vector field on the complex. However, the verification part relies on a claim that doesn't seem to hold. In this note, we provide a couple of counterexamples against this specific claim. We also provide an alternative proof of the bigger claim that the constructed discrete vector field is indeed a gradient vector field. Our proof technique relies on a key observation which is not specific to the problem at hand, and thus is applicable while verifying a constructed discrete vector field is a gradient one in general.