arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study two types of two player, perfect information games with no chance moves, played on the edge set of the binomial random graph ${\mathcal G}(n,p)$. In each round of the $(1 : q)$ Waiter-Client Hamiltonicity game, the first player, called Waiter, offers the second player, called Client, $q+1$ edges of ${\mathcal G}(n,p)$ which have not been offered previously. Client then chooses one of these edges, which he claims, and the remaining $q$ edges go back to Waiter. Waiter wins this game if by the time every edge of ${\mathcal G}(n,p)$ has been claimed by some player, the graph consisting of Client's edges is Hamiltonian; otherwise Client is the winner. Client-Waiter games are defined analogously, the main difference being that Client wins the game if his graph is Hamiltonian and Waiter wins otherwise. In this paper we determine a sharp threshold for both games. Namely, for every fixed positive integer $q$, we prove that the smallest edge probability $p$ for which a.a.s. Waiter has a winning strategy for the $(1 : q)$ Waiter-Client Hamiltonicity game is $(1 + o(1)) \log n/n$, and the smallest $p$ for which a.a.s. Client has a winning strategy for the $(1 : q)$ Client-Waiter Hamiltonicity game is $(q + 1 + o(1)) \log n/n$.

The degree anti-Ramsey number $AR_d(H)$ of a graph $H$ is the smallest integer $k$ for which there exists a graph $G$ with maximum degree at most $k$ such that any proper edge colouring of $G$ yields a rainbow copy of $H$. In this paper we prove a general upper bound on degree anti-Ramsey numbers, determine the precise value of the degree anti-Ramsey number of any forest, and prove an upper bound on the degree anti-Ramsey numbers of cycles of any length which is best possible up to a multiplicative factor of $2$. Our proofs involve a variety of tools, including a classical result of Bollobás concerning cross intersecting families and a topological version of Hall's Theorem due to Aharoni, Berger and Meshulam.

For a finite set $X$, a family of sets ${\mathcal F} \subseteq 2^X$ and a positive integer $q$, we consider two types of two player, perfect information games with no chance moves. In each round of the $(1 : q)$ Waiter-Client game $(X, {\mathcal F})$, the first player, called Waiter, offers the second player, called Client, $q+1$ elements of the board $X$ which have not been offered previously. Client then chooses one of these elements which he claims and the remaining $q$ elements to go back to Waiter. Waiter wins this game if by the time every element of $X$ has been claimed by some player, Client has claimed all elements of some $A \in {\mathcal F}$; otherwise Client is the winner. Client-Waiter games are defined analogously, the main difference being that Client wins the game if he manages to claim all elements of some $A \in {\mathcal F}$ and Waiter wins otherwise. In this paper we study the Waiter-Client and Client-Waiter versions of the non-planarity, $K_t$-minor and non-$k$-colorability games. For each such game, we give a fairly precise estimate of the unique integer $q$ at which the outcome of the game changes from Client's win to Waiter's win. We also discuss the relation between our results, random graphs, and the corresponding Maker-Breaker and Avoider-Enforcer games.

For positive integers $n$ and $q$ and a monotone graph property $\cA$, we consider the two player, perfect information game $\WC(n,q,\cA)$, which is defined as follows. The game proceeds in rounds. In each round, the first player, called Waiter, offers the second player, called Client, $q+1$ edges of the complete graph $K_n$ which have not been offered previously. Client then chooses one of these edges which he keeps and the remaining $q$ edges go back to Waiter. If at the end of the game, the graph which consists of the edges chosen by Client satisfies the property $\cA$, then Waiter is declared the winner; otherwise Client wins the game. In this paper we study such games (also known as Picker-Chooser games) for a variety of natural graph theoretic parameters, such as the size of a largest component or the length of a longest cycle. In particular, we describe a phase transition type phenomenon which occurs when the parameter $q$ is close to $n$ and is reminiscent of phase transition phenomena in random graphs. Namely, we prove that if $q \leq (1 - \varepsilon) n$, then Client can avoid connected components of order $c \varepsilon^{-2} \ln n$ for some absolute constant $c > 0$, whereas, for $q \geq (1 + \varepsilon) n$, Waiter can force a giant, linearly sized, connected component in Client's graph. We also prove that Waiter can force Client's graph to be pancyclic for every $q \leq c n$, where $c > 0$ is an appropriate constant.

A graph $G = (V,E)$ is said to be saturated with respect to a monotone increasing graph property ${\mathcal P}$, if $G \notin {\mathcal P}$ but $G \cup \{e\} \in {\mathcal P}$ for every $e \in \binom{V}{2} \setminus E$. The saturation game $(n, {\mathcal P})$ is played as follows. Two players, called Mini and Max, progressively build a graph $G \subseteq K_n$, which does not satisfy ${\mathcal P}$. Starting with the empty graph on $n$ vertices, the two players take turns adding edges $e \in \binom{V(K_n)}{2} \setminus E(G)$, for which $G \cup \{e\} \notin {\mathcal P}$, until no such edge exists (i.e. until $G$ becomes ${\mathcal P}$-saturated), at which point the game is over. Max's goal is to maximize the length of the game, whereas Mini aims to minimize it. The score of the game, denoted by $s(n, {\mathcal P})$, is the number of edges in $G$ at the end of the game, assuming both players follow their optimal strategies. We prove lower and upper bounds on the score of games in which the property the players need to avoid is being $k$-connected, having chromatic number at least $k$, and admitting a matching of a given size. In doing so we demonstrate that the score of certain games can be as large as the Turán number or as low as the saturation number of the respective graph property. We also demonstrate that the score might strongly depend on the identity of the first player to move.

A classical theorem of Ghouila-Houri from 1960 asserts that every directed graph on $n$ vertices with minimum out-degree and in-degree at least $n/2$ contains a directed Hamilton cycle. In this paper we extend this theorem to a random directed graph ${\mathcal D}(n,p)$, that is, a directed graph in which every ordered pair $(u,v)$ becomes an arc with probability $p$ independently of all other pairs. Motivated by the study of resilience of properties of random graphs, we prove that if $p \gg \log n/\sqrt{n}$, then a.a.s. every subdigraph of ${\mathcal D}(n,p)$ with minimum out-degree and in-degree at least $(1/2 + o(1)) n p$ contains a directed Hamilton cycle. The constant $1/2$ is asymptotically best possible. Our result also strengthens classical results about the existence of directed Hamilton cycles in random directed graphs.

Given a fixed graph $H$ and a positive integer $n$, a Picker-Chooser $H$-game is a biased game played on the edge set of $K_n$ in which Picker is trying to force many copies of $H$ and Chooser is trying to prevent him from doing so. In this paper we conjecture that the value of the game is roughly the same as the expected number of copies of $H$ in the random graph $G(n,p)$ and prove our conjecture for special cases of $H$ such as complete graphs and trees.

We study 3-random-like graphs, that is, sequences of graphs in which the densities of triangles and anti-triangles converge to 1/8. Since the random graph ${\mathcal G}_{n,1/2}$ is, in particular, 3-random-like, this can be viewed as a weak version of quasirandomness. We first show that 3-random-like graphs are 4-universal, that is, they contain induced copies of all 4-vertex graphs. This settles a question of Linial and Morgenstern. We then show that for larger subgraphs, 3-random-like sequences demonstrate a completely different behaviour. We prove that for every graph $H$ on $n\geq R(10,10)$ vertices there exist 3-random-like graphs without an induced copy of $H$. Moreover, we prove that for every $\ell$ there are 3-random-like graphs which are $\ell$-universal but not $m$-universal when $m$ is sufficiently large compared to $\ell$.

Let $\mc{K}_{3,3}^3$ be the 3-graph with 15 vertices $\{x_i, y_i: 1 \le i \le 3\}$ and $\{z_{ij}: 1 \le i,j \le 3\}$, and 11 edges $\{x_1, x_2, x_3\}$, $\{y_1, y_2, y_3\}$ and $\{\{x_i, y_j, z_{ij}\}: 1 \le i,j \le 3\}$. We show that for large $n$, the unique largest $\mc{K}_{3,3}^3$-free 3-graph on $n$ vertices is a balanced blow-up of the complete 3-graph on 5 vertices. Our proof uses the stability method and a result on lagrangians of intersecting families that has independent interest.

For a tree T on n vertices, we study the Maker-Breaker game, played on the edge set of the complete graph on n vertices, which Maker wins as soon as the graph she builds contains a copy of T. We prove that if T has bounded maximum degree, then Maker can win this game within n+1 moves. Moreover, we prove that Maker can build almost every tree on n vertices in n-1 moves and provide non-trivial examples of families of trees which Maker cannot build in n-1 moves.

A packing of a graph G with Hamilton cycles is a set of edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles in G. Such packings have been studied intensively and recent results imply that a largest packing of Hamilton cycles in G_n,p a.a.s. has size \lfloor delta(G_n,p) /2 \rfloor. Glebov, Krivelevich and Szabó recently initiated research on the `dual' problem, where one asks for a set of Hamilton cycles covering all edges of G. Our main result states that for log^{117}n / n < p < 1-n^{-1/8}, a.a.s. the edges of G_n,p can be covered by \lceil Delta(G_n,p)/2 \rceil Hamilton cycles. This is clearly optimal and improves an approximate result of Glebov, Krivelevich and Szabó, which holds for p > n^{-1+\eps}. Our proof is based on a result of Knox, Kühn and Osthus on packing Hamilton cycles in pseudorandom graphs.

For a positive integer $k$ we consider the $k$-vertex-connectivity game, played on the edge set of $K_n$, the complete graph on $n$ vertices. We first study the Maker-Breaker version of this game and prove that, for any integer $k \geq 2$ and sufficiently large $n$, Maker has a strategy for winning this game within $\lfloor k n/2 \rfloor + 1$ moves, which is clearly best possible. This answers a question of Hefetz, Krivelevich, Stojaković and Szabó. We then consider the strong $k$-vertex-connectivity game. For every positive integer $k$ and sufficiently large $n$, we describe an explicit first player's winning strategy for this game.

In this paper we study the (a : b) Maker-Breaker Connectivity game, played on the edge-set of the complete graph on n vertices. We determine the winner for almost all values of a and b.

Given a tree $T=(V,E)$ on $n$ vertices, we consider the $(1 : q)$ Maker-Breaker tree embedding game ${\mathcal T}_n$. The board of this game is the edge set of the complete graph on $n$ vertices. Maker wins ${\mathcal T}_n$ if and only if he is able to claim all edges of a copy of $T$. We prove that there exist real numbers $α, ε> 0$ such that, for sufficiently large $n$ and for every tree $T$ on $n$ vertices with maximum degree at most $n^ε$, Maker has a winning strategy for the $(1 : q)$ game ${\mathcal T}_n$, for every $q \leq n^α$. Moreover, we prove that Maker can win this game within $n + o(n)$ moves which is clearly asymptotically optimal.

We study Maker-Breaker games played on the edge set of a random graph. Specifically, we consider the random graph process and analyze the first time in a typical random graph process that Maker starts having a winning strategy for his final graph to admit some property $\mP$. We focus on three natural properties for Maker's graph, namely being $k$-vertex-connected, admitting a perfect matching, and being Hamiltonian. We prove the following optimal hitting time results: with high probability Maker wins the $k$-vertex connectivity game exactly at the time the random graph process first reaches minimum degree $2k$; with high probability Maker wins the perfect matching game exactly at the time the random graph process first reaches minimum degree $2$; with high probability Maker wins the Hamiltonicity game exactly at the time the random graph process first reaches minimum degree $4$. The latter two statements settle conjectures of Stojaković and Szabó.

In a seminal paper, Alon and Tarsi have introduced an algebraic technique for proving upper bounds on the choice number of graphs (and thus, in particular, upper bounds on their chromatic number). The upper bound on the choice number of $G$ obtained via their method, was later coined the \emph{Alon-Tarsi number of $G$} and was denoted by $AT(G)$. They have provided a combinatorial interpretation of this parameter in terms of the eulerian subdigraphs of an appropriate orientation of $G$. Their characterization can be restated as follows. Let $D$ be an orientation of $G$. Assign a weight $ω_D(H)$ to every subdigraph $H$ of $D$: if $H \subseteq D$ is eulerian, then $ω_D(H) = (-1)^{e(H)}$, otherwise $ω_D(H) = 0$. Alon and Tarsi proved that $AT(G) \leq k$ if and only if there exists an orientation $D$ of $G$ in which the out-degree of every vertex is strictly less than $k$, and moreover $\sum_{H \subseteq D} ω_D(H) \neq 0$. Shortly afterwards, for the special case of line graphs of $d$-regular $d$-edge-colorable graphs, Alon gave another interpretation of $AT(G)$, this time in terms of the signed $d$-colorings of the line graph. In this paper we generalize both results. The first characterization is generalized by showing that there is an infinite family of weight functions (which includes the one considered by Alon and Tarsi), each of which can be used to characterize $AT(G)$. The second characterization is generalized to all graphs (in fact the result is even more general -- in particular it applies to hypergraphs). We then use the second generalization to prove that $χ(G) = ch(G) = AT(G)$ holds for certain families of graphs $G$. Some of these results generalize certain known choosability results.

In numerous positional games the identity of the winner is easily determined. In this case one of the more interesting questions is not {\em who} wins but rather {\em how fast} can one win. These type of problems were studied earlier for Maker-Breaker games; here we initiate their study for unbiased Avoider-Enforcer games played on the edge set of the complete graph $K_n$ on $n$ vertices. For several games that are known to be an Enforcer's win, we estimate quite precisely the minimum number of moves Enforcer has to play in order to win. We consider the non-planarity game, the connectivity game and the non-bipartite game.

In this paper we prove a sufficient condition for the existence of a Hamilton cycle, which is applicable to a wide variety of graphs, including relatively sparse graphs. In contrast to previous criteria, ours is based on only two properties: one requiring expansion of ``small'' sets, the other ensuring the existence of an edge between any two disjoint ``large'' sets. We also discuss applications in positional games, random graphs and extremal graph theory.