arXiv++ Combinatorics

A corollary of Hall's marriage theorem is that a sufficient condition for a list $(V_1, \ldots ,V_m)$ of sets to have a system of distinct representatives is that $|V_i|\ge deg_{\{V_1, \ldots ,V_m\}}(v)$ for every $i\in [m]$ and $v \in \bigcup_{i\in [m]}V_i$. This we dub a {\em global} condition. A folklore result is that a {\em local} condition - that the inequality holds for pairs $i,v$ for which $v \in V_i$ - suffices. These are special cases of a general type of results - large sets, whose elements are sparse in some sense, have a system of representatives that is independent in a related graph. We study two such scenarios, in both of which each $V_i$ is replaced by a $k$-uniform hypergraph $H_i$, the representatives are hyperedges, and distinctness is replaced by disjointness. In one setting the sparsity is measured by the degrees of vertices in the hypergraphs, in the other by the degrees of vertices in the line graph. The proofs use the topological version of Hall's theorem. In particular, we shall use a lower bound on the topological connectivity of the independence complex of a graph, defined by vector representations. We also provide short proofs of the local infinite version, known as the ``Milner-Shelah theorem''.

It is known that in matroids the difference between the chromatic number and the fractional chromatic number is smaller than 1, and that the list chromatic number is equal to the chromatic number. We investigate the gap within these pairs of parameters for hypergraphs that are the intersection of a given number k of matroids. We prove that in such hypergraphs the list chromatic number is at most k times the chromatic number and at most 2k-1 times the maximum chromatic number among the k matroids. We study the relationship between three polytopes associated with k-sets of matroids, and connect them to bounds on the fractional chromatic number of the intersection of the members of the k-set. This also connects to bounds on the matroidal matching and covering number of the intersection of the members of the k-set. The tools used are in part topological.

A Young diagram $Y$ is called wide if every sub-diagram $Z$ formed by a subset of the rows of $Y$ dominates $Z'$, the conjugate of $Z$. A Young diagram $Y$ is called Latin if its squares can be assigned numbers so that for each $i$, the $i$th row is filled injectively with the numbers $1, \ldots ,a_i$, where $a_i$ is the length of $i$th row of $Y$, and every column is also filled injectively. A conjecture of Chow and Taylor, publicized by Chow, Fan, Goemans, and Vondrak is that a wide Young diagram is Latin. We prove a dual version of the conjecture.

A pair $(A,B)$ of hypergraphs is called orthogonal if $|a \cap b|=1$ for every pair of edges $a \in A$ and $b \in B$. An orthogonal pair of hypergraphs is called a loom if each of its two members is the set of minimum covers of the other. Looms appear naturally in the context of a conjecture of Gyárfás and Lehel on the covering number of cross-intersecting hypergraphs. We study their properties and ways of construction, and prove special cases of a conjecture that if true would imply the Gyárfás--Lehel conjecture.

We give a simple proof of a recent result of Gollin and Joó: if a possibly infinite system of homogeneous linear equations $A\vec{x} = \vec{0}$, where $A = (a_{i, j})$ is an $I \times J$ matrix, has only the trivial solution, then there exists an injection $φ: J \to I$, such that $a_{φ(j), j} \neq 0$ for all $j \in J$.

This is a not-to-be-journal-published paper, aimed to serve as reference. It is a summary of the main ideas on the topic appearing in the title, and an opportunity to state correctly the main conjecture in the field.

Given a graph $G$ and a coloring of its edges, a subgraph of $G$ is called rainbow if its edges have distinct colors. The rainbow girth of an edge coloring of G is the minimum length of a rainbow cycle in G. A generalization of the famous Caccetta-Häggkvist conjecture, proposed by the first author, is that if in an coloring of the edge set of an $n$-vertex graph by $n$ colors, in which each color class is of size $k$, the rainbow girth is at most $\lceil \frac{n}{k} \rceil$. In the known examples for sharpness of this conjecture the color classes are stars, suggesting that when the color classes are matchings, the result may be improved. We show that the rainbow girth of $n$ matchings of size at least 2 is $O(\log n)$.

The Caccetta-Häggkvist conjecture (denoted below CHC) states that the directed girth (the smallest length of a directed cycle) $dgirth(D)$ of a directed graph $D$ on $n$ vertices is at most $\lceil \frac{n}{δ^+(D)}\rceil$, where $δ^+(D)$ is the minimum out-degree of~$D$. We consider a version involving all out-degrees, not merely the minimum one, and prove that if $D$ does not contain a sink, then $dgirth(D) \le 2 \sum_{v\in V(D)} \frac{1}{deg^+(v)+1}$. In the spirit of a generalization of the CHC to rainbow cycles in \cite{ADH2019}, this suggests the conjecture that given non-empty sets $F_1, \ldots,F_n$ of edges of $K_n$, there exists a rainbow cycle of length at most $2\sum_{1\le i \le n}\frac{1}{|F_i|+1}$. We prove a bit stronger result when $1\le |F_i|\le 2$, thereby strengthening a result of DeVos et. al \cite{DDFGGHMM2021}. We prove a logarithmic bound on the rainbow girth in the case that the sets $F_i$ are triangles.

This is a survey paper on rainbow sets (another name for ``choice functions''). The main theme is the distinction between two types of choice functions: those having a large (in the sense of belonging to some specified filter, namely closed up set of sets) image, and those that have a large domain and small image, where ``smallness'' means belonging to some specified complex (a closed-down set). The paper contains some new results: (1) theorems on scrambled versions, in which the sets are re-shuffled before choosing the rainbow set, and (2) results on weighted and cooperative versions - to be defined below.

A conjecture of the first two authors is that $n$ matchings of size $n$ in any graph have a rainbow matching of size $n-1$. We prove a lower bound of $\frac{2}{3}n-1$, improving on the trivial $\frac{1}{2}n$, and an analogous result for hypergraphs. For $\{C_3,C_5\}$-free graphs and for disjoint matchings we obtain a lower bound of $\frac{3n}{4}-O(1)$. We also discuss a conjecture on rainbow alternating paths, that if true would yield a lower bound of $n-\sqrt{2n}$. We prove the non-alternating (ordinary paths) version of this conjecture.

A d-partite hypergraph is called *fractionally balanced* if there exists a non-negative, not identically zero, function on its edge set that has constant degrees in each vertex side. Using a topological version of Hall's theorem we prove lower bounds on the matching number of such hypergraphs. These bounds yield rainbow versions of the KKM theorem for products of simplices, which in turn are used to obtain some results on multiple-cake division, and on rainbow matchings in families of d-intervals.

We prove that every family of (not necessarily distinct) odd cycles $O_1, \dots, O_{2\lceil n/2 \rceil-1}$ in the complete graph $K_n$ on $n$ vertices has a rainbow odd cycle (that is, a set of edges from distinct $O_i$'s, forming an odd cycle). As part of the proof, we characterize those families of $n$ odd cycles in $K_{n+1}$ that do not have any rainbow odd cycle. We also characterize those families of $n$ cycles in $K_{n+1}$, as well as those of $n$ edge-disjoint nonempty subgraphs of $K_{n+1}$, without any rainbow cycle.

Drisko proved that $2n-1$ matchings of size $n$ in a bipartite graph have a rainbow matching of size $n$. For general graphs it is conjectured that $2n$ matchings suffice for this purpose (and that $2n-1$ matchings suffice when $n$ is even). The known graphs showing sharpness of this conjecture for $n$ even are called badges. We improve the previously best known bound from $3n-2$ to $3n-3$, using a new line of proof that involves analysis of the appearance of badges. We also prove a "cooperative" generalization: for $t>0$ and $n \geq 3$, any $3n-4+t$ sets of edges, the union of every $t$ of which contains a matching of size $n$, have a rainbow matching of size $n$.

Let $k>1$, and let $\mathcal{F}$ be a family of $2n+k-3$ non-empty sets of edges in a bipartite graph. If the union of every $k$ members of $\mathcal{F}$ contains a matching of size $n$, then there exists an $\mathcal{F}$-rainbow matching of size $n$. Replacing $2n+k-3$ by $2n+k-2$, the result is true also for $k=1$, and it can be proved (for all $k$) both topologically and by a relatively simple combinatorial argument. The main effort is in gaining the last $1$, which makes the result sharp.

For a given class $\mathcal{C}$ of graphs and given integers $m \leq n$, let $f_\mathcal{C}(n,m)$ be the minimal number $k$ such that every $k$ independent $n$-sets in any graph belonging to $\mathcal{C}$ have a (possibly partial) rainbow independent $m$-set. Motivated by known results on the finiteness and actual value of $f_\mathcal{C}(n,m)$ when $\mathcal{C}$ is the class of line graphs of graphs, we study this function for various other classes.

Mantel's Theorem asserts that a simple $n$ vertex graph with more than $\frac{1}{4}n^2$ edges has a triangle (three mutually adjacent vertices). Here we consider a rainbow variant of this problem. We prove that whenever $G_1, G_2, G_3$ are simple graphs on a common set of $n$ vertices and $|E(G_i)| > ( \frac{ 26 - 2 \sqrt{7} }{81})n^2 \approx 0.2557 n^2$ for $1 \le i \le 3$, then there exist distinct vertices $v_1,v_2,v_3$ so that (working with the indices modulo 3) we have $v_i v_{i+1} \in E(G_i)$ for $1 \le i \le 3$. We provide an example to show this bound is best possible. This also answers a question of Diwan and Mubayi. We include a new short proof of Mantel's Theorem we obtained as a byproduct.

Given a system $(G_1, \ldots ,G_m)$ of graphs on the same vertex set $V$, a cooperative coloring is a choice of vertex sets $I_1, \ldots ,I_m$, such that $I_j$ is independent in $G_j$ and $\bigcup_{j=1}^{m}I_j = V$. For a class $\mathcal{G}$ of graphs, let $m_{\mathcal{G}}(d)$ be the minimal $m$ such that every $m$ graphs from $\mathcal{G}$ with maximum degree $d$ have a cooperative coloring. We prove that $Ω(\log\log d) \le m_\mathcal{T}(d) \le O(\log d)$ and $Ω(\log d)\le m_\mathcal{B}(d) \le O(d/\log d)$, where $\mathcal{T}$ is the class of trees and $\mathcal{B}$ is the class of bipartite graphs.

We prove that any family $E_1, \ldots , E_{\lceil rn \rceil}$ of (not necessarily distinct) sets of edges in an $r$-uniform hypergraph, each having a fractional matching of size $n$, has a rainbow fractional matching of size $n$ (that is, a set of edges from distinct $E_i$'s which supports such a fractional matching). When the hypergraph is $r$-partite and $n$ is an integer, the number of sets needed goes down from $rn$ to $rn-r+1$. The problem solved here is a fractional version of the corresponding problem about rainbow matchings, which was solved by Drisko and by Aharoni and Berger in the case of bipartite graphs, but is open for general graphs as well as for $r$-partite hypergraphs with $r>2$. Our topological proof is based on a result of Kalai and Meshulam about a simplicial complex and a matroid on the same vertex set.

A famous conjecture of Caccetta and Häggkvist is that in a digraph on $n$ vertices and minimum out-degree at least $\frac{n}{r}$ there is a directed cycle of length $r$ or less. We consider the following generalization: in an undirected graph on $n$ vertices, any collection of $n$ disjoint sets of edges, each of size at least $\frac{n}{r}$, has a rainbow cycle of length $r$ or less. We focus on the case $r=3$, and prove the existence of a rainbow triangle under somewhat stronger conditions than in the conjecture. For any fixed $k$ and large enough $n$, we determine the maximum number of edges in an $n$-vertex edge-coloured graph where all colour classes have size at most $k$ and there is no rainbow triangle. Moreover, we characterize the extremal graphs for this problem.

The {\em independent domination number} $γ^i(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the maximum, over all independent sets $I$, of the minimal number of vertices needed to dominate $I$. It is known \cite{abz} that in chordal graphs $γ^i$ is equal to $γ$, the ordinary domination number. The weighted version of this result is not true, but we show that it does hold for interval graphs, and for the intersection (that is, line) graphs of subtrees of a given tree, where each subtree is a single edge.