arXiv++ Combinatorics

We consider the equal sum partition problem, motivated by distance magic graph labeling: Given $n,k \in \N$ such that $k\, | \sum_{i=1}^ni$ and a partition $p_1+\cdots+p_k=n$, when is it possible to find a partition of the set $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ into $k$ subsets of sizes $p_1,\dots,p_k$, such that the element sum in each subset is the same? A known necessary condition is the \emph{slack condition}, requiring that for all $j$, placing the largest possible elements in the $j$ smallest sets yields a total sum that is at least what is needed. However, this condition is not sufficient, and known counterexamples exist. This work clarifies the boundary between solvable and unsolvable instances of the problem. We extend the list of unsolvable problem instances satisfying the slack condition by exhibiting infinite families where the $n/k$ ratio is any rational number in the interval $(2,\frac{24}{7})$, and a new criterion for unsolvability. Furthermore, we show that the slack condition is natural, as it is both necessary and sufficient for the fractional relaxation of the problem. Based on this result, we prove that the problem is solvable for the class of linear partitions, where $k$ is fixed, $p_1,\ldots,p_k$ grow linearly with $n$, and where the slack condition holds in a strong sense. We do this by applying a randomized rounding algorithm to a solution of the fractional relaxation of the problem and proving that the algorithm has an exponentially small failure probability.

It is known that in matroids the difference between the chromatic number and the fractional chromatic number is smaller than 1, and that the list chromatic number is equal to the chromatic number. We investigate the gap within these pairs of parameters for hypergraphs that are the intersection of a given number k of matroids. We prove that in such hypergraphs the list chromatic number is at most k times the chromatic number and at most 2k-1 times the maximum chromatic number among the k matroids. We study the relationship between three polytopes associated with k-sets of matroids, and connect them to bounds on the fractional chromatic number of the intersection of the members of the k-set. This also connects to bounds on the matroidal matching and covering number of the intersection of the members of the k-set. The tools used are in part topological.

This work is about a partition problem which is an instance of the distance magic graph labeling problem. Given positive integers $n,k$ and $p_1\le p_2\le \cdots\le p_k$ such that $p_1+\cdots+p_k=n$ and $k$ divides $\sum_{i=1}^ni$, we study the problem of characterizing the cases where it is possible to find a partition of the set $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ into $k$ subsets of respective sizes $p_1,\dots,p_k$, such that the element sum in each subset is equal. Using a computerized search we found examples showing that the necessary condition, $\sum_{i=1}^{p_1+\cdots+p_j} (n-i+1)\ge j{\binom{n+1}{2}}/k$ for all $j=1,\ldots,k$, is not generally sufficient, refuting a past conjecture. Moreover, we show that there are infinitely many such counter-examples. The question whether there is a simple characterization is left open and for all we know the corresponding decision problem might be NP-complete.

For a simplicial complex ${\mathcal C}$ denote by $β({\mathcal C})$ the minimal number of edges from ${\mathcal C}$ needed to cover the ground set. If ${\mathcal C}$ is a matroid then for every partition $A_1, \ldots, A_m$ of the ground set there exists a set $S \in {\mathcal C}$ meeting each $A_i$ in at least $\frac{|A_i|}{β({\mathcal C})}$ elements. We conjecture that a slightly weaker result is true for the intersections of two matroids: if ${\mathcal D}={\mathcal P} \cap {\mathcal Q}$, where ${\mathcal P},{\mathcal Q}$ are matroids on the same ground set $V$ and $β({\mathcal P}), β({\mathcal P}) \le k$, then for every partition $A_1, \ldots, A_m$ of the ground set there exists a set $S \in {\mathcal D}$ meeting each $A_i$ in at least $(\frac{1}{k}-\frac{1}{|V|})|A_i|-1$ elements. We prove this for a partition into two sets.

For a hypergraph $H$ let $β(H)$ denote the minimal number of edges from $H$ covering $V(H)$. An edge $S$ of $H$ is said to represent {\em fairly} (resp. {\em almost fairly}) a partition $(V_1,V_2, \ldots, V_m)$ of $V(H)$ if $|S\cap V_i|\ge \lfloor\frac{|V_i|}{β(H)}\rfloor$ (resp. $|S\cap V_i|\ge \lfloor\frac{|V_i|}{β(H)}\rfloor-1$) for all $i \le m$. In matroids any partition of $V(H)$ can be represented fairly by some independent set. We look for classes of hypergraphs $H$ in which any partition of $V(H)$ can be represented almost fairly by some edge. We show that this is true when $H$ is the set of independent sets in a path, and conjecture that it is true when $H$ is the set of matchings in $K_{n,n}$. We prove that partitions of $E(K_{n,n})$ into three sets can be represented almost fairly. The methods of proofs are topological.

We study conjectures relating degree conditions in $3$-partite hypergraphs to the matching number of the hypergraph, and use topological methods to prove special cases. In particular, we prove a strong version of a theorem of Drisko \cite{drisko} (as generalized by the first two authors \cite{ab}), that every family of $2n-1$ matchings of size $n$ in a bipartite graph has a partial rainbow matching of size $n$. We show that milder restrictions on the sizes of the matchings suffice. Another result that is strengthened is a theorem of Cameron and Wanless \cite{CamWan}, that every Latin square has a diagonal (permutation submatrix) in which no symbol appears more than twice. We show that the same is true under the weaker condition that the square is row-Latin.

Stein proposed the following conjecture: if the edge set of $K_{n,n}$ is partitioned into $n$ sets, each of size $n$, then there is a partial rainbow matching of size $n-1$. He proved that there is a partial rainbow matching of size $n(1-\frac{D_n}{n!})$, where $D_n$ is the number of derangements of $[n]$. This means that there is a partial rainbow matching of size about $(1- \frac{1}{e})n$. Using a topological version of Hall's theorem we improve this bound to $\frac{2}{3}n$.

Let $f(n)$ be the smallest number such that every collection of $n$ matchings, each of size at least $f(n)$, in a bipartite graph, has a full rainbow matching. Generalizing famous conjectures of Ryser, Brualdi and Stein, Aharoni and Berger conjectured that $f(n)=n+1$ for every $n>1$. Clemens and Ehrenm{ü}ller proved that $f(n) \le \frac{3}{2}n +o(n)$. We show that the $o(n)$ term can be reduced to a constant, namely $f(n) \le \lceil \frac{3}{2}n \rceil+1$.

Drisko \cite{drisko} proved (essentially) that every family of $2n-1$ matchings of size $n$ in a bipartite graph possesses a partial rainbow matching of size $n$. In \cite{bgs} this was generalized as follows: Any $\lfloor \frac{k+2}{k+1} n \rfloor -(k+1)$ matchings of size $n$ in a bipartite graph have a rainbow matching of size $n-k$. We extend this latter result to matchings of not necessarily equal cardinalities. Settling a conjecture of Drisko, we characterize those families of $2n-2$ matchings of size $n$ in a bipartite graph that do not possess a rainbow matching of size $n$. Combining this with an idea of Alon \cite{alon}, we re-prove a characterization of the extreme case in a well-known theorem of Erdős-Ginzburg-Ziv in additive number theory.

Given an $n\times n$ array $M$ ($n\ge 7$), where each cell is colored in one of two colors, we give a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a partition of $M$ into $n$ diagonals, each containing at least one cell of each color. As a consequence, it follows that if each color appears in at least $2n-1$ cells, then such a partition exists. The proof uses results on completion of partial Latin squares.

Let $G$ be a complete $k$-partite simple undirected graph with parts of sizes $p_1\le p_2...\le p_k$. Let $P_j=\sum_{i=1}^jp_i$ for $j=1,...,k$. It is conjectured that $G$ has distance magic labeling if and only if $\sum_{i=1}^{P_j} (n-i+1)\ge j{{n+1}\choose{2}}/k$ for all $j=1,...,k$. The conjecture is proved for $k=4$, extending earlier results for $k=2,3$.