arXiv++ Combinatorics

We prove that for $δ$ small, $n$ large, and any three conjugacy classes $C_{1},C_{2},C_{3}$ of $G=\mathrm{Alt}(n)$ of size at least $|G|^{1-δ}$ we have $C_{1}C_{2}C_{3}=G$. The result provides a positive answer to Problem 20.23 of the Kourovka Notebook [KM22], improves theorems of Garonzi and Maróti [GM21] (using $4$ classes) and Rodgers [Rod02] (using larger classes), complements the known result for $G$ a simple group of Lie type [MP21] [LST24] [FM25], and is tight in several senses. Furthermore, since no character theory is involved, the proof can be used in principle to build a constructive algorithm that, given $g\in G$, outputs $c_{i}\in C_{i}$ such that $c_{1}c_{2}c_{3}=g$.

The Liebeck-Nikolov-Shalev conjecture [LNS12] asserts that, for any finite simple non-abelian group $G$ and any set $A\subseteq G$ with $|A|\geq 2$, $G$ is the product of at most $N\frac{\log|G|}{\log|A|}$ conjugates of $A$, for some absolute constant $N$. For $G$ of Lie type, we prove that for any $\varepsilon>0$ there is some $N_{\varepsilon}$ for which $G$ is the product of at most $N_{\varepsilon}\left(\frac{\log|G|}{\log|A|}\right)^{1+\varepsilon}$ conjugates of either $A$ or $A^{-1}$. For symmetric sets, this improves on results of Liebeck, Nikolov, and Shalev [LNS12] and Gill, Pyber, Short, and Szabó [GPSS13]. During the preparation of this paper, the proof of the Liebeck-Nikolov-Shalev conjecture was completed by Lifshitz [Lif24]. Both papers use [GLPS24] as a starting point. Lifshitz's argument uses heavy machinery from representation theory to complete the conjecture, whereas this paper achieves a more modest result by rather elementary combinatorial arguments.

We give a combinatorial proof of the following theorem. Let $G$ be any finite group acting transitively on a set of cardinality $n$. If $S \subseteq G$ is a random set of size $k$, with $k \geq (\log n)^{1+\varepsilon}$ for some $\varepsilon >0$, then the diameter of the corresponding Schreier graph is $O(\log_k n)$ with high probability. Except for the implicit constant, this result is the best possible.

For every connected, almost simple linear algebraic group $G\leq\mathrm{GL}_{n}$ over a large enough field $K$, every subvariety $V\subseteq G$, and every finite generating set $A\subseteq G(K)$, we prove a general dimensional bound, that is, a bound of the form \[|A\cap V(\overline{K})|\leq C_{1}|A^{C_{2}}|^{\frac{\dim(V)}{\dim(G)}}\] with $C_{1},C_{2}$ depending only on $n,\mathrm{deg}(V)$. The dependence of $C_1$ on $n$ (or rather on $\dim (V)$) is doubly exponential, whereas $C_2$ (which is independent of $\mathrm{deg}(V)$) depends simply exponentially on $n$. Bounds of this form have proved useful in the study of growth in linear algebraic groups since 2005 (Helfgott) and, before then, in the study of subgroup structure (Larsen-Pink: $A$ a subgroup). In bounds for general $V$ and $G$ available before our work, the dependence of $C_1$ and $C_2$ on $n$ was of exponential-tower type. We draw immediate consequences regarding diameter bounds for untwisted classical groups $G(\mathbb{F}_{q})$. (In a separate paper, we derive stronger diameter bounds from stronger dimensional bounds we prove for specific families of varieties $V$.)

Babai's conjecture states that, for any finite simple non-abelian group $G$, the diameter of $G$ is bounded by $(\log|G|)^{C}$ for some absolute constant $C$. We prove that, for any untwisted classical group $G$ of rank $r$ defined over a field $\mathbb{F}_{q}$ with $q$ not too small with respect to $r$, \begin{equation*} \mathrm{diam}(G(\mathbb{F}_{q}))\leq(\log|G(\mathbb{F}_{q})|)^{408r^{4}}. \end{equation*} This bound improves on results by Breuillard, Green, and Tao [9], Pyber and Szabó [38], and, for $q$ large enough, also by Halasi, Maróti, Pyber, and Qiao [16]. Our approach is in several ways closer to that of preexistent work by Helfgott [20], in that we give dimensional estimates (that is, bounds of the form $|A\cap V(\mathbb{F}_{q})|\ll|A^{C}|^{\dim(V)/\dim(G)}$, where $A$ is any generating set) for varieties $V$ of specific types, and work in the Lie algebra whenever possible. One of our main tools is a new, more efficient form of escape from subvarieties.

We prove that a set $A$ of at most $q$ non-collinear points in the finite plane $\mathbb{F}_{q}^{2}$ spans at least $\approx\frac{|A|}{\sqrt{q}}$ directions: this is based on a lower bound contained in [FST13], which we prove again together with a different upper bound than the one given therein. Then, following the procedure used in [RS18], we prove a new structural theorem about slowly growing sets in $\mathrm{Aff}(\mathbb{F}_{q})$ for any finite field $\mathbb{F}_{q}$, generalizing the analogous results in [Hel15] [Mur17] [RS18] over prime fields.

Following Babai's algorithm for the string isomorphism problem, we determine that it is possible to write expressions of short length describing certain permutation cosets, including all permutation subgroups; this is feasible both in the original version of the algorithm and in its CFSG-free version, partially done by Babai and completed by Pyber. The existence of such descriptions gives a weak form of the Cameron-Maróti classification even without assuming CFSG. We also thoroughly explicate Babai's recursion process (as given in Helfgott) and obtain explicit constants for the runtime of the algorithm, both with and without the use of CFSG.

In these notes we investigate BIBDs with $λ=1$ that present subdesigns evenly covering both blocks and vertices: we determine some of their basic properties, consequence of already existing results in the literature, with regards to their size and the number of intersections of pairs and triples of subdesigns of a specific kind. We also describe the link between these particular BIBDs and the graph isomorphism problem, based on Babai's paper, and point out the characteristics of these designs that would lead to improvements of the algorithm for the GIP.

We prove that the number of iterations taken by the Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm for configurations coming from Schreier graphs is closely linked to the diameter of the graphs themselves: an upper bound is found for general Schreier graphs, and a lower bound holds for particular cases, such as for Schreier graphs with $G=\mbox{SL}_{n}({\mathbb F}_{q})$ ($q>2$) acting on $k$-tuples of vectors in ${\mathbb F}_{q}^{n}$; moreover, an exact expression is found in the case of Cayley graphs.