arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let ${\cal G}$ be a minor-closed graph class and let $G$ be an $n$-vertex graph. We say that $G$ is a $k$-apex of ${\cal G}$ if $G$ contains a set $S$ of at most $k$ vertices such that $G\setminus S$ belongs to ${\cal G}$. Our first result is an algorithm that decides whether $G$ is a $k$-apex of ${\cal G}$ in time $2^{{\sf poly}(k)}\cdot n^2$, where ${\sf poly}$ is a polynomial function depending on ${\cal G}$. This algorithm improves the previous one, given by Sau, Stamoulis, and Thilikos [ICALP 2020], whose running time was $2^{{\sf poly}(k)}\cdot n^3$. The elimination distance of $G$ to ${\cal G}$, denoted by ${\sf ed}_{\cal G}(G)$, is the minimum number of rounds required to reduce each connected component of $G$ to a graph in ${\cal G}$ by removing one vertex from each connected component in each round. Bulian and Dawar [Algorithmica 2017] provided an FPT-algorithm, with parameter $k$, to decide whether ${\sf ed}_{\cal G}(G)\leq k$. However, its dependence on $k$ is not explicit. We extend the techniques used in the first algorithm to decide whether ${\sf ed}_{\cal G}(G)\leq k$ in time $2^{2^{2^{{\sf poly}(k)}}}\cdot n^2$. This is the first algorithm for this problem with an explicit parametric dependence in $k$. In the special case where ${\cal G}$ excludes some apex-graph as a minor, we give two alternative algorithms, running in time $2^{2^{{\cal O}(k^2\log k)}}\cdot n^2$ and $2^{{\sf poly}(k)}\cdot n^3$ respectively, where $c$ and ${\sf poly}$ depend on ${\cal G}$. As a stepping stone for these algorithms, we provide an algorithm that decides whether ${\sf ed}_{\cal G}(G)\leq k$ in time $2^{{\cal O}({\sf tw}\cdot k+{\sf tw}\log{\sf tw})}\cdot n$, where ${\sf tw}$ is the treewidth of $G$. Finally, we provide explicit upper bounds on the size of the graphs in the minor-obstruction set of the class of graphs ${\cal E}_k({\cal G})=\{G\mid{\sf ed}_{\cal G}(G)\leq k\}$.

Given a graph $G$, we define ${\bf bcg}(G)$ as the minimum $k$ for which $G$ can be contracted to the uniformly triangulated grid $Γ_{k}$. A graph class ${\cal G}$ has the SQG${\bf C}$ property if every graph $G\in{\cal G}$ has treewidth $\mathcal{O}({\bf bcg}(G)^{c})$ for some $1\leq c<2$. The SQG${\bf C}$ property is important for algorithm design as it defines the applicability horizon of a series of meta-algorithmic results, in the framework of bidimensionality theory, related to fast parameterized algorithms, kernelization, and approximation schemes. These results apply to a wide family of problems, namely problems that are contraction-bidimensional. Our main combinatorial result reveals a wide family of graph classes that satisfy the SQG${\bf C}$ property. This family includes, in particular, bounded-degree string graphs. This considerably extends the applicability of bidimensionality theory for contraction bidimensional problems.

A linkage in a graph $G$ of size $k$ is a subgraph $L$ of $G$ whose connected components are $k$ paths. The pattern of a linkage of size $k$ is the set of $k$ pairs formed by the endpoints of these paths. A consequence of the Unique Linkage Theorem is the following: there exists a function $f:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}$ such that if a plane graph $G$ contains a sequence $\mathcal{C}$ of at least $f(k)$ nested cycles and a linkage of size at most $k$ whose pattern vertices lay outside the outer cycle of $\mathcal{C},$ then $G$ contains a linkage with the same pattern avoiding the inner cycle of $\mathcal{C}$. In this paper we prove the following variant of this result: Assume that all the cycles in $\mathcal{C}$ are "orthogonally" traversed by a linkage $P$ and $L$ is a linkage whose pattern vertices may lay either outside the outer cycle or inside the inner cycle of $\mathcal{C}:=[C_{1},\ldots,C_{p},\ldots,C_{2p-1}]$. We prove that there are two functions $g,f:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}$, such that if $L$ has size at most $k$, $P$ has size at least $f(k),$ and $|\mathcal{C}|\geq g(k)$, then there is a linkage with the same pattern as $L$ that is "internally combed" by $P$, in the sense that $L\cap C_{p}\subseteq P\cap C_{p}$. In fact, we prove this result in the most general version where the linkage $L$ is $s$-scattered: no two vertices of distinct paths of $L$ are within distance at most $s$. We deduce several variants of this result in the cases where $s=0$ and $s>0$. These variants permit the application of the unique linkage theorem on several path routing problems on embedded graphs.

The Graph Minors Structure Theorem of Robertson and Seymour asserts that, for every graph $H,$ every $H$-minor-free graph can be obtained by clique-sums of ``almost embeddable'' graphs. Here a graph is ``almost embeddable'' if it can be obtained from a graph of bounded Euler-genus by pasting graphs of bounded pathwidth in an ``orderly fashion'' into a bounded number of faces, called the \textit{vortices}, and then adding a bounded number of additional vertices, called \textit{apices}, with arbitrary neighborhoods. Our main result is a {full classification} of all graphs $H$ for which the use of vortices in the theorem above can be avoided. To this end we identify a (parametric) graph $\mathscr{S}_{t}$ and prove that all $\mathscr{S}_{t}$-minor-free graphs can be obtained by clique-sums of graphs embeddable in a surface of bounded Euler-genus after deleting a bounded number of vertices. We show that this result is tight in the sense that the appearance of vortices cannot be avoided for $H$-minor-free graphs, whenever $H$ is not a minor of $\mathscr{S}_{t}$ for some $t\in\mathbb{N}.$ Using our new structure theorem, we design an algorithm that, given an $\mathscr{S}_{t}$-minor-free graph $G,$ computes the generating function of all perfect matchings of $G$ in polynomial time. Our results, combined with known complexity results, imply a complete characterization of minor-closed graph classes where the number of perfect matchings is polynomially computable: They are exactly those graph classes that do not contain every $\mathscr{S}_{t}$ as a minor. This provides a \textit{sharp} complexity dichotomy for the problem of counting perfect matchings in minor-closed classes.

A strict bramble of a graph $G$ is a collection of pairwise-intersecting connected subgraphs of $G.$ The order of a strict bramble ${\cal B}$ is the minimum size of a set of vertices intersecting all sets of ${\cal B}.$ The strict bramble number of $G,$ denoted by ${\sf sbn}(G),$ is the maximum order of a strict bramble in $G.$ The strict bramble number of $G$ can be seen as a way to extend the notion of acyclicity, departing from the fact that (non-empty) acyclic graphs are exactly the graphs where every strict bramble has order one. We initiate the study of this graph parameter by providing three alternative definitions, each revealing different structural characteristics. The first is a min-max theorem asserting that ${\sf sbn}(G)$ is equal to the minimum $k$ for which $G$ is a minor of the lexicographic product of a tree and a clique on $k$ vertices (also known as the lexicographic tree product number). The second characterization is in terms of a new variant of a tree decomposition called lenient tree decomposition. We prove that ${\sf sbn}(G)$ is equal to the minimum $k$ for which there exists a lenient tree decomposition of $G$ of width at most $k.$ The third characterization is in terms of extremal graphs. For this, we define, for each $k,$ the concept of a $k$-domino-tree and we prove that every edge-maximal graph of strict bramble number at most $k$ is a $k$-domino-tree. We also identify three graphs that constitute the minor-obstruction set of the class of graphs with strict bramble number at most two. We complete our results by proving that, given some $G$ and $k,$ deciding whether ${\sf sbn}(G) \leq k$ is an ${\sf NP}$-complete problem.

We introduce a novel model-theoretic framework inspired from graph modification and based on the interplay between model theory and algorithmic graph minors. The core of our framework is a new compound logic operating with two types of sentences, expressing graph modification: the modulator sentence, defining some property of the modified part of the graph, and the target sentence, defining some property of the resulting graph. In our framework, modulator sentences are in counting monadic second-order logic (CMSOL) and have models of bounded treewidth, while target sentences express first-order logic (FOL) properties along with minor-exclusion. Our logic captures problems that are not definable in first-order logic and, moreover, may have instances of unbounded treewidth. Also, it permits the modeling of wide families of problems involving vertex/edge removals, alternative modulator measures (such as elimination distance or $\mathcal{G}$-treewidth), multistage modifications, and various cut problems. Our main result is that, for this compound logic, model-checking can be done in quadratic time. All derived algorithms are constructive and this, as a byproduct, extends the constructibility horizon of the algorithmic applications of the Graph Minors theorem of Robertson and Seymour. The proposed logic can be seen as a general framework to capitalize on the potential of the irrelevant vertex technique. It gives a way to deal with problem instances of unbounded treewidth, for which Courcelle's theorem does not apply. The proof of our meta-theorem combines novel combinatorial results related to the Flat Wall theorem along with elements of the proof of Courcelle's theorem and Gaifman's theorem. We finally prove extensions where the target property is expressible in FOL+DP, i.e., the enhancement of FOL with disjoint-paths predicates.

For a finite collection of graphs ${\cal F}$, the ${\cal F}$-M-DELETION (resp. ${\cal F}$-TM-DELETION) problem consists in, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, decide whether there exists $S \subseteq V(G)$ with $|S| \leq k$ such that $G \setminus S$ does not contain any of the graphs in ${\cal F}$ as a minor (resp. topological minor). We are interested in the parameterized complexity of both problems when the parameter is the treewidth of $G$, denoted by $tw$, and specifically in the cases where ${\cal F}$ contains a single connected planar graph $H$. We present algorithms running in time $2^{O(tw)} \cdot n^{O(1)}$, called single-exponential, when $H$ is either $P_3$, $P_4$, $C_4$, the paw, the chair, and the banner for both $\{H\}$-M-DELETION and $\{H\}$-TM-DELETION, and when $H=K_{1,i}$, with $i \geq 1$, for $\{H\}$-TM-DELETION. Some of these algorithms use the rank-based approach introduced by Bodlaender et al. [Inform Comput, 2015]. This is the second of a series of articles on this topic, and the results given here together with other ones allow us, in particular, to provide a tight dichotomy on the complexity of $\{H\}$-M-DELETION in terms of $H$.

For a finite collection of graphs ${\cal F}$, the ${\cal F}$-M-DELETION problem consists in, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, decide whether there exists $S \subseteq V(G)$ with $|S| \leq k$ such that $G \setminus S$ does not contain any of the graphs in ${\cal F}$ as a minor. We are interested in the parameterized complexity of ${\cal F}$-M-DELETION when the parameter is the treewidth of $G$, denoted by $tw$. Our objective is to determine, for a fixed ${\cal F}$, the smallest function $f_{\cal F}$ such that ${\cal F}$-M-DELETION can be solved in time $f_{\cal F}(tw) \cdot n^{O(1)}$ on $n$-vertex graphs. We provide lower bounds under the ETH on $f_{\cal F}$ for several collections ${\cal F}$. We first prove that for any ${\cal F}$ containing connected graphs of size at least two, $f_{\cal F}(tw)= 2^{Ω(tw)}$, even if the input graph $G$ is planar. Our main contribution consists of superexponential lower bounds for a number of collections ${\cal F}$, inspired by a reduction of Bonnet et al.~[IPEC, 2017]. In particular, we prove that when ${\cal F}$ contains a single connected graph $H$ that is either $P_5$ or is not a minor of the banner (that is, the graph consisting of a $C_4$ plus a pendent edge), then $f_{\cal F}(tw)= 2^{Ω(tw \cdot \log tw)}$. This is the third of a series of articles on this topic, and the results given here together with other ones allow us, in particular, to provide a tight dichotomy on the complexity of $\{H\}$-M-DELETION, in terms of $H$, when $H$ is connected.

We introduce the block elimination distance as a measure of how close a graph is to some particular graph class. Formally, given a graph class ${\cal G}$, the class ${\cal B}({\cal G})$ contains all graphs whose blocks belong to ${\cal G}$ and the class ${\cal A}({\cal G})$ contains all graphs where the removal of a vertex creates a graph in ${\cal G}$. Given a hereditary graph class ${\cal G}$, we recursively define ${\cal G}^{(k)}$ so that ${\cal G}^{(0)}={\cal B}({\cal G})$ and, if $k\geq 1$, ${\cal G}^{(k)}={\cal B}({\cal A}({\cal G}^{(k-1)}))$. The block elimination distance of a graph $G$ to a graph class ${\cal G}$ is the minimum $k$ such that $G\in{\cal G}^{(k)}$ and can be seen as an analog of the elimination distance parameter, with the difference that connectivity is now replaced by biconnectivity. We show that, for every non-trivial hereditary class ${\cal G}$, the problem of deciding whether $G\in{\cal G}^{(k)}$ is NP-complete. We focus on the case where ${\cal G}$ is minor-closed and we study the minor obstruction set of ${\cal G}^{(k)}$. We prove that the size of the obstructions of ${\cal G}^{(k)}$ is upper bounded by some explicit function of $k$ and the maximum size of a minor obstruction of ${\cal G}$. This implies that the problem of deciding whether $G\in{\cal G}^{(k)}$ is constructively fixed parameter tractable, when parameterized by $k$. Our results are based on a structural characterization of the obstructions of ${\cal B}({\cal G})$, relatively to the obstructions of ${\cal G}$. We give two graph operations that generate members of ${\cal G}^{(k)}$ from members of ${\cal G}^{(k-1)}$ and we prove that this set of operations is complete for the class ${\cal O}$ of outerplanar graphs. This yields the identification of all members ${\cal O}\cap{\cal G}^{(k)}$, for every $k\in\mathbb{N}$ and every non-trivial minor-closed graph class ${\cal G}$.

Let $\mathcal{G}$ be a minor-closed graph class. We say that a graph $G$ is a $k$-apex of $\mathcal{G}$ if $G$ contains a set $S$ of at most $k$ vertices such that $G\setminus S$ belongs to $\mathcal{G}.$ We denote by $\mathcal{A}_k (\mathcal{G})$ the set of all graphs that are $k$-apices of $\mathcal{G}.$ We prove that every graph in the obstruction set of $\mathcal{A}_k (\mathcal{G}),$ i.e., the minor-minimal set of graphs not belonging to $\mathcal{A}_k (\mathcal{G}),$ has size at most $2^{2^{2^{2^{\mathsf{poly}(k)}}}},$ where $\mathsf{poly}$ is a polynomial function whose degree depends on the size of the minor-obstructions of $\mathcal{G}.$ This bound drops to $2^{2^{\mathsf{poly}(k)}}$ when $\mathcal{G}$ excludes some apex graph as a minor.

We introduce a supporting combinatorial framework for the Flat Wall Theorem. In particular, we suggest two variants of the theorem and we introduce a new, more versatile, concept of wall homogeneity as well as the notion of regularity in flat walls. All proposed concepts and results aim at facilitating the use of the irrelevant vertex technique in future algorithmic applications.

Let ${\cal G}$ be a minor-closed graph class. We say that a graph $G$ is a $k$-apex of ${\cal G}$ if $G$ contains a set $S$ of at most $k$ vertices such that $G\setminus S$ belongs to ${\cal G}$. We denote by ${\cal A}_k ({\cal G})$ the set of all graphs that are $k$-apices of ${\cal G}.$ In the first paper of this series we obtained upper bounds on the size of the graphs in the minor-obstruction set of ${\cal A}_k ({\cal G})$, i.e., the minor-minimal set of graphs not belonging to ${\cal A}_k ({\cal G}).$ In this article we provide an algorithm that, given a graph $G$ on $n$ vertices, runs in $2^{{\sf poly}(k)}\cdot n^3$-time and either returns a set $S$ certifying that $G \in {\cal A}_k ({\cal G})$, or reports that $G \notin {\cal A}_k ({\cal G})$. Here ${\sf poly}$ is a polynomial function whose degree depends on the maximum size of a minor-obstruction of ${\cal G}.$ In the special case where ${\cal G}$ excludes some apex graph as a minor, we give an alternative algorithm running in $2^{{\sf poly}(k)}\cdot n^2$-time.

The irrelevant vertex technique provides a powerful tool for the design of parameterized algorithms for a wide variety of problems on graphs. A common characteristic of these problems, permitting the application of this technique on surface-embedded graphs, is the fact that every graph of large enough treewidth contains a vertex that is irrelevant, in the sense that its removal yields an equivalent instance of the problem. The straightforward application of this technique yields algorithms with running time that is quadratic in the size of the input graph. This running time is due to the fact that it takes linear time to detect one irrelevant vertex and the total number of irrelevant vertices to be detected is linear as well. Using advanced techniques, sub-quadratic algorithms have been designed for particular problems, even in general graphs. However, designing a general framework for linear-time algorithms has been open, even for the bounded-genus case. In this paper we introduce a general framework that enables finding in linear time an entire set of irrelevant vertices whose removal yields a bounded-treewidth graph, provided that the input graph has bounded genus. Our technique consists of decomposing any surface-embedded graph into a tree-structured collection of bounded-treewidth subgraphs where detecting globally irrelevant vertices can be done locally and independently. Our method is applicable to a wide variety of known graph containment or graph modification problems where the irrelevant vertex technique applies. Examples include the (Induced) Minor Folio problem, the (Induced) Disjoint Paths problem, and the $\mathcal{F}$-Minor-Deletion problem.

For a fixed finite collection of graphs ${\cal F}$, the ${\cal F}$-M-DELETION problem asks, given an $n$-vertex input graph $G,$ for the minimum number of vertices that intersect all minor models in $G$ of the graphs in ${\cal F}$. by Courcelle Theorem, this problem can be solved in time $f_{\cal F}(tw)\cdot n^{O(1)},$ where $tw$ is the treewidth of $G$, for some function $f_{\cal F}$ depending on ${\cal F}$ In a recent series of articles, we have initiated the programme of optimizing asymptotically the function $f_{\cal F}$. Here we provide an algorithm showing that $f_{\cal F}(tw) = 2^{O(tw\cdot \log tw)}$ for every collection ${\cal F}$. Prior to this work, the best known function $f_{\cal F}$ was double-exponential in $tw$. In particular, our algorithm vastly extends the results of Jansen et al. [SODA 2014] for the particular case ${\cal F}=\{K_5,K_{3,3}\}$ and of Kociumaka and Pilipczuk [Algorithmica 2019] for graphs of bounded genus, and answers an open problem posed by Cygan et al. [Inf Comput 2017]. We combine several ingredients such as the machinery of boundaried graphs in dynamic programming via representatives, the Flat Wall Theorem, Bidimensionality, the irrelevant vertex technique, treewidth modulators, and protrusion replacement. Together with our previous results providing single-exponential algorithms for particular collections ${\cal F}$ [Theor Comput Sci 2020] and general lower bounds [J Comput Syst Sci 2020], our algorithm yields the following complexity dichotomy when ${\cal F} = \{H\}$ contains a single connected graph $H,$ assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis: $f_H(tw)=2^{Θ(tw)}$ if $H$ is a contraction of the chair or the banner, and $f_H(tw)=2^{Θ(tw\cdot \log tw)}$ otherwise.

For a finite collection of graphs ${\cal F}$, the \textsc{${\cal F}$-TM-Deletion} problem has as input an $n$-vertex graph $G$ and an integer $k$ and asks whether there exists a set $S \subseteq V(G)$ with $|S| \leq k$ such that $G \setminus S$ does not contain any of the graphs in ${\cal F}$ as a topological minor. We prove that for every such ${\cal F}$, \textsc{${\cal F}$-TM-Deletion} is fixed parameter tractable on planar graphs. Our algorithm runs in a $2^{\mathcal{O}(k^2)}\cdot n^{2}$ time or, alternatively in $2^{\mathcal{O}(k)}\cdot n^{4}$ time. Our techniques can easily be extended to graphs that are embeddable on any fixed surface.

A graph is called a pseudoforest if none of its connected components contains more than one cycle. A graph is an apex-pseudoforest if it can become a pseudoforest by removing one of its vertices. We identify 33 graphs that form the minor-obstruction set of the class of apex-pseudoforests, i.e., the set of all minor-minimal graphs that are not apex-pseudoforests.

We study the concept of \emph{compactor}, which may be seen as a counting-analogue of kernelization in counting parameterized complexity. For a function $F:Σ^*\to \Bbb{N}$ and a parameterization $κ: Σ^*\to \Bbb{N}$, a compactor $({\sf P},{\sf M})$ consists of a polynomial-time computable function ${\sf P}$, called \emph{condenser}, and a computable function ${\sf M}$, called \emph{extractor}, such that $F={\sf M}\circ {\sf P}$, and the condensing ${\sf P}(x)$ of $x$ has length at most $s(κ(x))$, for any input $x\in Σ^*.$ If $s$ is a polynomial function, then the compactor is said to be of polynomial-size. Although the study on counting-analogue of kernelization is not unprecedented, it has received little attention so far. We study a family of vertex-certified counting problems on graphs that are MSOL-expressible; that is, for an MSOL-formula $φ$ with one free set variable to be interpreted as a vertex subset, we want to count all $A\subseteq V(G)$ where $|A|=k$ and $(G,A)\models φ.$ In this paper, we prove that every vertex-certified counting problems on graphs that is \emph{MSOL-expressible} and \emph{treewidth modulable}, when parameterized by $k$, admits a polynomial-size compactor on $H$-topological-minor-free graphs with condensing time $O(k^2n^2)$ and decoding time $2^{O(k)}.$ This implies the existence of an {\sf FPT}-algorithm of running time $O(n^2k^2)+2^{O(k)}.$ All aforementioned complexities are under the Uniform Cost Measure (UCM) model where numbers can be stored in constant space and arithmetic operations can be done in constant time.

In 1990, Thomas proved that every graph admits a tree decomposition of minimum width that additionally satisfies a certain vertex-connectivity condition called leanness [A Menger-like property of tree-width: The finite case. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 48(1):67-76, 1990]. This result had many uses and has been extended to several other decompositions. In this paper, we consider tree-cut decompositions, that have been introduced by Wollan as a possible edge-version of tree decompositions [The structure of graphs not admitting a fixed immersion. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 110:47-66, 2015]. We show that every graph admits a tree-cut decomposition of minimum width that additionally satisfies an edge-connectivity condition analogous to Thomas' leanness.

We study the class L of link-types that admit a K4-minor-free diagram, i.e., they can be projected on the plane so that the resulting graph does not contain any subdivision of K4. We prove that L is the closure of a subclass of torus links under the operation of connected sum. Using this structural result, we enumerate L and subclasses of it, with respect to the minimum number of crossings or edges in a projection of L' in L. Further, we obtain counting formulas and asymptotic estimates for the connected K4-minor-free link-diagrams, minimal K4-minor-free link-diagrams, and K4-minor-free diagrams of the unknot.

For a finite collection of graphs ${\cal F}$, the ${\cal F}$-M-DELETION problem consists in, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, deciding whether there exists $S \subseteq V(G)$ with $|S| \leq k$ such that $G \setminus S$ does not contain any of the graphs in ${\cal F}$ as a minor. We are interested in the parameterized complexity of ${\cal F}$-M-DELETION when the parameter is the treewidth of $G$, denoted by $tw$. Our objective is to determine, for a fixed ${\cal F}$, the smallest function $f_{\cal F}$ such that {${\cal F}$-M-DELETION can be solved in time $f_{\cal F}(tw) \cdot n^{O(1)}$ on $n$-vertex graphs. We prove that $f_{\cal F}(tw) = 2^{2^{O(tw \cdot\log tw)}}$ for every collection ${\cal F}$, that $f_{\cal F}(tw) = 2^{O(tw \cdot\log tw)}$ if ${\cal F}$ contains a planar graph, and that $f_{\cal F}(tw) = 2^{O(tw)}$ if in addition the input graph $G$ is planar or embedded in a surface. We also consider the version of the problem where the graphs in ${\cal F}$ are forbidden as topological minors, called ${\cal F}$-TM-DELETION. We prove similar results for this problem, except that in the last two algorithms, instead of requiring ${\cal F}$ to contain a planar graph, we need it to contain a subcubic planar graph. This is the first of a series of articles on this topic.