arXiv++ Combinatorics

Dyck paths are one of the most important objects in enumerative combinatorics, and there are many papers devoted to counting selected families of Dyck paths. Here we present two approaches for the automatic counting of many such families, using both a "dumb" approach (driven by numeric dynamic programming) that often works in practice, and a "clever" approach, needed for larger problems, driven by "symbolic" dynamic programming. Both approaches are fully automated and implemented in Maple.

In a delightful article that recently appeared in the American Mathematics Monthly, Norbert Henze and Guenter Last discuss the "Absent-Minded Passengers" Problem, but left open finding an explicit expression for the probability generating function, of the random variable "Number of passengers occupying a wrong seat", when the number of absent-minded passengers is larger than one. This is accomplished in this note, using experimental mathematics and symbolic computation. We also derive explicit expressions for the first 8 moments of the original case of one absent-minded passenger, and indicate how to extend it to the general case

We illustrate the power of Experimental Mathematics and Symbolic Computation to suggest irrationality proofs of natural constants, and the determination of their irrationality measures. Sometimes such proofs can be fully automated, but sometimes there is still need for a human touch.

We use a variant of Salikhov's ingenious proof that the irrationality measure of $π$ is at most $7.606308\dots$ to prove that, in fact, it is at most $7.103205334137\dots$. Accompanying Maple package: While this article has a fully rigorous human-made and human-readable proof of the claim in the title, it was discovered thanks to the Maple package available from http://sites.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/mamarim/mamarimhtml/pimeas.html

Integer partitions are one of the most fundamental objects of combinatorics (and number theory), and so is enumerating objects avoiding patterns. In the present paper we describe two approaches for the systematic counting of classes of partitions avoiding an arbitrary set of "patterns".

In the spirit of "multi-culturalism", we use four kinds of computations: simulation, numeric, symbolic, and "conceptual" to explore some "games of pure chance" inspired by children board games like "Snakes and Ladders" (aka as "Chutes and Ladders") and "gambler's ruin with unlimited credit". Even more interesting than the many computer-generated actual results described in this paper and its web-site extension, is our broad-minded, ecunemical approach, not favoring, a priori, any one of the above four kinds of computation, but showing that, a posteriori, symbolic computation is the most important one, since (except for simulation, that is very inaccurate) numerics can be made more efficient with the help of symbolics (in the "downward" direction), and, (in the "upward" direction) the mere existence of certain symbolic-computational algorithms imply interesting "qualitative" results, that certain numbers are always rational, or always algebraic, and certain sequences are always polynomial, or C-recursive, or algebraic, or holonomic. This article is accompanied by four Maple packages, and numerous input and output files, that readers can use as templates for their own investigations.

In a delightful article that recently appeared in Mathematics Magazine, David and Lori Mccune analyze the board game "Count Your Chickens!", recommended to children three and up. Alas, they use the advanced theory of Markov chains, that presupposes a knowledge of linear algebra, that few three-years-olds are likely to understand. Here we present a much simpler, more intuitive, approach, that while unlikely to be understood by three-year-olds, will probably be understood by a smart 14-year-old. Moreover, our approach accomplishes much more, and is more efficient. It uses symbolic, rather than numeric computation.

Based on a reduction processing, we rewrite a hypergeometric term as the sum of the difference of a hypergeometric term and a reduced hypergeometric term (the reduced part, in short). We show that when the initial hypergeometric term has a certain kind of symmetry, the reduced part contains only odd or even powers. As applications, we derived two infinite families of super-congruences.

We use the holonomic ansatz to estimate the asymptotic behavior, in $T$, of the average maximal number of balls in a bin that is obtained when one throws uniformly at random (without replacement) $r$ balls into $n$ bins, $T$ times. Our approach works, in principle, for any fixed $n$ and $r$. We were able to do the cases $(n,r)$ = $(2,1),(3,1),(4,1), (4,2)$, but things get too complicated for larger values of $n$ and $r$. We are pledging a \$150 donation to the OEIS for an explicit expression, (in terms of $n$, $r$, and $π$) for the constant $C_{n,r}$ such that that average equals $\frac{n}{r}\,T+C_{n,r} \sqrt{T}+O(1/\sqrt{T})$. In this version we announce that the problem has been solved (to the extent possible) by Marcus Michelen.

In 1980 Otto G. Ruehr made some puzzling comments that a certain identity A, that he proved, is equivalent to another identity B, but he did not explain why they are equivalent. Recently J.-P. Allouche tried to explain why they are "equivalent", using about eight pages. We comment that it is extremely unlikely to be Ruehr's reasoning (he probably got mixed up with a different problem), but be that as it may, it is not worthwhile to try and deduce B from A, since both A and B are routinely provable using Wilf-Zeilberger algorithmic proof theory (implemented in Maple) and the Almkvist-Zeilberger algorithm.

One of the greatest algorithms of all time is Quicksort. Its average running time is famously O(nlog(n)), and its variance, less famously, is O(n^2) (hence its standard deviation is O(n)). But what about higher moments? Here we find explicit expressions for the first eight moments, their scaled limits, and we describe how to compute, approximately (but very accurately), percentiles of running time for any list-length

At the Jan. 2018 Joint Mathematics Meetings, Avi Wigderson gave a series of three fascinating lectures whose starting point was the Sinkhorn algorithm. One of the people in the audience was Mel Nathanson, and this lead him to ask some intriguing questions, some of which we answer in this note.

We discuss, and make partial progress on, the peaceable queens problem, the protagonist of OEIS sequence A250000. Symbolically, we prove that Jubin's construction of two pentagons is at least a local optimum. Numerically, we find the exact numerical optimums for some specific configurations. Our method can be easily applied to more complicated configurations with more parameters.

Inspired by a recent article by Anthony Zaleski and Doron Zeilberger, we investigate the question of determining the largest k for which there exists boolean formulas in disjunctive normal form (DNF) with n variables, none of whose conjunctions are `parallel', and such that all of them have at least k literals. Using a SAT solver, we answer some of the questions they left open. We also determine the corresponding numbers for DNFs obeying certain symmetries.

In Gert Almkvist's beautiful article, entitled "Invariants, mostly old ones", (that appeared in the Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 86 (1980), pp. 1-13) he talked about a sequence of generating functions that came up in his work, that turned out to be the same as generating functions for the number of covariants of binary quadratic forms studied by Faa de Bruno, Cayley, Sylvester, and other 19th century savantes. Using a very simple-minded Maple program (that uses the partial-fraction decomposition of a rational function), we recompute them, and go all the way to degree 18. It turns out that the same method can be used to answer many other enumeration questions, including the one in the title.

Suppose that your mother gave you n candies. You have to eat at least one candy each day. One possibility is to eat all n of them the first day. The other extreme is to make them last n days, and only eat one candy a day. Altogether, you have, famously, 2 to the power n-1 choices. If each such choice is equally likely, what is the probability that you never have three consecutive days, where in the first day you ate at least 2 candies, in the second day you ate at least 5 candies, and in the third day you ate at least 3 candies? This article describes algorithms, fully implemented in two Maple packages, to answer such important questions, and more general ones, of this kind.

In this methodological article on experimental-yet-rigorous enumerative combinatorics, we use two instructive case studies, to show that often, just like Alexander the Great before us, the simple, "cheating" solution to a hard problem is the best. So before you spend days (and possibly years) trying to answer a mathematical question by analyzing and trying to 'understand' its structure, let your computer generate enough data, and then let it guess the answer. Often its guess can be proved by a quick 'hand-waving' (yet fully rigorous) 'meta-argument'. Since our purpose is to illustrate a methodology, we include many details, as well as Maple source-code.

We present a case study in {\it experimental} yet {\it rigorous} mathematics by describing an algorithm, fully implemented in both Mathematica and Maple, that {\it automatically conjectures}, and then {\it automatically proves}, closed-form expressions extending Dyson's celebrated constant term conjecture.

We recall the notion of fractional enumeration and immediately focus on the fractional counting of integer partitions, where each partition gets credit equal to the reciprocal of the product of its parts. We raise two intriguing questions regarding this count, and for each of these questions, we are pledging a 100 US dollars donation to the OEIS in honor of the first solver. In this revised version we announce that both questions have been answered. The first was first answered by Will Sawin and the second was answered by Christopher Ryba. A donation to the OEIS, of 100 US dollars each, in their honor has been made.

We use a "reverse engineering" method, pioneered by George Andrews, to discover an explicit expression for the determinant of a certain tridiagonal matrix discussed by Derrick Henry Lehmer in 1974, that lead to OEIS sequence A039924. Lehmer only did the infinite case, and here we also do the finite case, that immediately implies the former by taking the limit as n goes to infinity