arXiv++ Combinatorics

We introduce a very simple solitaire game, named Stanley Solitaire, in honor of Richard Stanley, and prove an explicit closed-form formula for the number of ways of playing it. Alas, the only proof that we know is via a deep theorem of Richard Stanley from 1984. We challenge the readers to find a more elementary proof.

On March 16, 2024, Daniel Litt, in an X-post, proposed the following brainteaser: "Flip a fair coin 100 times. It gives a sequence of heads (H) and tails (T). For each HH in the sequence of flips, Alice gets a point; for each HT, Bob does, so e.g. for the sequence THHHT Alice gets 2 points and Bob gets 1 point. Who is most likely to win?" We show the power of symbolic computation, in particular the (continuous) Almkvist-Zeilberger algorithm, to answer this, and far more general, questions of this kind.

Starting from AJ Bu's recent article that computed explicit expressions for the GENERATING functions of sums of powers of areas under Dyck and Motzkin paths, we deduce from them explicit expressions for the actual sequences. This enables taking the limits of the scaled moments and confirming, in an entirely elementary way, that they tend to those of the area under Brownian Excursion (up to any specified moment).

We present both bijective and automated approaches to Abel-type sums, dear to Dominique Foata.

In his seminal paper ``A census of planar triangulations", published in 1962, the iconic graph theorist (and code-breaker), W.T. Tutte, spent a few pages to prove that a certain bi-variate generating function that enumerates triangulations, satisfies a certain functional equation. He then used his genius to actually solve it, giving closed-form solutions to the enumerating sequences. While the first part, of deriving the functional equation, still needs human ingenuity, the second part, of solving it, can nowadays be fully automated. Our Maple program, accompanying this paper, Tutte.txt, can not only solve Tutte's original equation in a few seconds, it can also solve many, far more complicated ones, way beyond the scope of even such a giant as W.T. Tutte. We use our favorite method of ``guess and check" and show how it can always be made fully rigorous (if desired).

In their study of water waves, Massimiliano Berti, Livia Corsi, Alberto Maspero, and Paulo Ventura, came up with two intriguing conjectured identities involving certain weighted sums over the Boolean lattice. They were able to prove the first one, while the second is still open. In this methodological note, we will describe how to generate many terms of these types of weighted sums, and if in luck, evaluate them in closed-form. We were able to use this approach to give a new proof of their first conjecture, and while we failed to prove the second conjecture, we give overwhelming evidence for its veracity. In this second version, we are happy to announce that Mark van Hoeij was able to complete the proof of the second conjecture, by explicitly solving the second-order recurrence mentioned at the end.

In their recent claimed computer-free proof of the Four Color Theorem, David Jackson and Bruce Richmond attempted to use sophisticated "asymptotic analysis" to explicitly compute a certain number whose positivity (according to them) implies this famous theorem. While the jury is still out whether their valiant attempt holds water, we prove, in this modest note, that this constant equals exactly 10/27. We also point out that their evaluation of this constant must be erroneous, for two good reasons. Finally, as an encore, we state many similar, but more complicated, results.

We study maximal seating arrangements, either on a line, or in a rectangular auditorium with a fixed number of columns but an arbitrary number of rows, that obey any prescribed set of `social distancing' restrictions. In addition to enumeration, we study the statistical distribution of the density, and give efficient algorithms for generating these at random

We revisit, implement, and experiment with a beautiful algorithm, due to Calabi and Wilf for the random generation of subspaces over a finie field.

Using experimental mathematics and symbolic computation, we derive many moments for the duration of a three player (fair) gambler's ruin.

We use three kinds of computations: simulation, numeric, and symbolic, to guide risk-averse gamblers in general, and offer particular advice on how to resolve the famous St. Petersburg paradox.

We use Experimental Mathematics and Symbolic Computation (with Maple), to search for lots and lots of Perrin- and Lucas- style primality tests, and try to sort the wheat from the chaff. More impressively, we find quite a few such primality tests for which we can explicitly construct infinite families of pseudo-primes, rather, like in the cases of Perrin pseudo-primes and the famous Carmichael primes, only proving the mere existence of infinitely many of them.

In this {\it case study}, we hope to show why Sheldon Axler was not just wrong, but {\em wrong}, when he urged, in 1995: ``Down with Determinants!''. We first recall how determinants are useful in enumerative combinatorics, and then illustrate three versatile tools (Dodgson's condensation, the holonomic ansatz and constant term evaluations) to operate in tandem to prove a certain intriguing determinantal formula conjectured by the first author. We conclude with a postscript describing yet another, much more efficient, method for evaluating determinants: `ask determinant-guru, Christian Krattenthaler', but advise people only to use it as a last resort, since if we would have used this last method right away, we would not have had the fun of doing it all by ourselves.

We demonstrate the power of Experimental Mathematics and Symbolic Computation to study intriguing problems on rational difference equations, studied extensively by Difference Equations giants, Saber Elaydi and Gerry Ladas (and their students and collaborators). In particular we rigorously prove some fascinating conjectures made by Amal Amleh and Gerry Ladas back in 2000. For other conjectures we are content with semi-rigorous proofs. We also extend the work of Emilie Purvine (formerly Hogan) and Doron Zeilberger for rigorously and semi-rigorously proving global asymptotic stability of arbitrary rational difference equations (with positive coefficients), and more generally rational transformations of the positive orthant of $R^k$ into itself

We show the power of Bruno Buchberger's seminal Groebner Basis algorithm, interfaced, seamlessly, with what we call symbolic dynamical programming, to automatically generate algebraic equations satisfied by the generating functions enumerating so-called Generalized Dyck Walks, i.e. 2D walks that start and end on the x-axis, and never dip below it, for an arbitrary set of steps. More impressively, we combine it with calculus (that Maple knows very well!), to automatically compute generating functions for the sum-of-the-areas of these generalized Dyck paths, and even for the sum of any given power of the areas, enabling us to get statistical information about the area under a random generalized Dyck path.

We extract brilliant ideas of Sandi Klavzar, Michel Mollard, and Marko Petkovsek who used them to solve one very specific enumeration problem, namely counting the number of words in the alphabet {0,1} of length n avoiding two consecutive ones, and having exactly k such neighbors, to a much more general setting where one has any (finite) alphabet, and any (finite) set of forbidden subwords. More important, we fully implement it in Maple.

Using Symbolic Computation with Maple, we can discover lots of (rigorously-proved!) facts about Standard Young Tableaux, in particular the distribution of the entries in any specific cell, and the sorting probabilities.

This paper consists of two independent, but related parts. In the first part we show how to use symbolic computation to derive explicit expressions for the first few moments of the number of implicants that a random Boolean function has, or equivalently the number of fixed-dimensional subcubes contained in a random subset of the $n$-dimensional cube. These explicit expressions suggest, but do not prove, that these random variables are always asymptotically normal. The second part presents a full, human-generated proof, of this asymptotic normality, first proved by Urszula Konieczna.

Noga Alon and Yaakov Malinovsky recently studied the following game: you start at 0, and keep rolling a fair standard die, and add the outcomes until the sum happens to be prime. We generalize this in several ways, illustrating the power of symbolic, rather than merely numeric, computation. We conclude with polemics why the beautiful rigorous error estimate of Alon and Malinovsky is only of theoretical interest, explaining why we were content, in our numerous extensions, with non-rigorous, but practically-certain, estimates.

This is a symbolic-computational redux, and extension, of a beautiful paper, by Harry Dym and Eugene Luks, published in 1966 (but written in 1964) about a certain game with balls and cells.