arXiv++ Combinatorics

In 1981, Adriano Garsia and Steve Milne found the first bijective proof of the celebrated Rogers-Ramanujan identities. To achieve this feat, they invented a versatile tool that they called the Involution Principle. In this note we revisit this useful principle from a very general perspective, independent of its application to specific combinatorial identities, and will explore its complexity.

We use the Almkvist-Zeilberger algorithm, combined with a weighted version of the Even-Gillis Laguerre integral due to Foata and Zeilberger, in order to efficiently compute weight enumerators of multiset derangements according to the number of cycles. The present paper is inspired by important previous work by Mourad Ismail and his collaborators, done in the late 1970s, but still useful after all these years.

One of the most important sequences in enumerative combinatorics is OEIS sequence A85, the number of involutions of length n. In the Art of Computer Programming, vol. 3, Don Knuth derived the O(1/n) asymptotic formula for these numbers. In this modest tribute to our two heroes, Neil Sloane who just turned 85, and Don Knuth who was 85 a year ago, we go all the way to an $O(1/n^{85})$ asymptotic formula.

Twenty years ago, Werner Krandick defined two statistics on binary trees. The first one determines the number of jumps, when traversing the tree in depth-first-search, from a vertex to one closer to the root, and the second keeps tracks of the sum of the jump-distances. He used clever but ad hoc human-generated arguments to find explicit expressions for their expectations. In this methodological note, we illustrate the power of experimental mathematics and symbolic computation to do much more. We derive closed-form expressions for the actual weight-enumerators according to these statistics (from which not only the expectations, but also the variances, and as many higher moments as desired, can be obtained). We also actually give the first eight moments, and conjecture that the first statistic (number of jumps) is asymptotically normal, and prove that the second one (sum of jump distances) is definitely not. In this revised version we are happy to announce that Stephen Melczer and Tia Ruza fully proved the asymptotic normality, and we provide a link to their writeup.

We introduce a very simple solitaire game, named Stanley Solitaire, in honor of Richard Stanley, and prove an explicit closed-form formula for the number of ways of playing it. Alas, the only proof that we know is via a deep theorem of Richard Stanley from 1984. We challenge the readers to find a more elementary proof.

On March 16, 2024, Daniel Litt, in an X-post, proposed the following brainteaser: "Flip a fair coin 100 times. It gives a sequence of heads (H) and tails (T). For each HH in the sequence of flips, Alice gets a point; for each HT, Bob does, so e.g. for the sequence THHHT Alice gets 2 points and Bob gets 1 point. Who is most likely to win?" We show the power of symbolic computation, in particular the (continuous) Almkvist-Zeilberger algorithm, to answer this, and far more general, questions of this kind.

Starting from AJ Bu's recent article that computed explicit expressions for the GENERATING functions of sums of powers of areas under Dyck and Motzkin paths, we deduce from them explicit expressions for the actual sequences. This enables taking the limits of the scaled moments and confirming, in an entirely elementary way, that they tend to those of the area under Brownian Excursion (up to any specified moment).

In his seminal paper ``A census of planar triangulations", published in 1962, the iconic graph theorist (and code-breaker), W.T. Tutte, spent a few pages to prove that a certain bi-variate generating function that enumerates triangulations, satisfies a certain functional equation. He then used his genius to actually solve it, giving closed-form solutions to the enumerating sequences. While the first part, of deriving the functional equation, still needs human ingenuity, the second part, of solving it, can nowadays be fully automated. Our Maple program, accompanying this paper, Tutte.txt, can not only solve Tutte's original equation in a few seconds, it can also solve many, far more complicated ones, way beyond the scope of even such a giant as W.T. Tutte. We use our favorite method of ``guess and check" and show how it can always be made fully rigorous (if desired).

In their study of water waves, Massimiliano Berti, Livia Corsi, Alberto Maspero, and Paulo Ventura, came up with two intriguing conjectured identities involving certain weighted sums over the Boolean lattice. They were able to prove the first one, while the second is still open. In this methodological note, we will describe how to generate many terms of these types of weighted sums, and if in luck, evaluate them in closed-form. We were able to use this approach to give a new proof of their first conjecture, and while we failed to prove the second conjecture, we give overwhelming evidence for its veracity. In this second version, we are happy to announce that Mark van Hoeij was able to complete the proof of the second conjecture, by explicitly solving the second-order recurrence mentioned at the end.

In their recent claimed computer-free proof of the Four Color Theorem, David Jackson and Bruce Richmond attempted to use sophisticated "asymptotic analysis" to explicitly compute a certain number whose positivity (according to them) implies this famous theorem. While the jury is still out whether their valiant attempt holds water, we prove, in this modest note, that this constant equals exactly 10/27. We also point out that their evaluation of this constant must be erroneous, for two good reasons. Finally, as an encore, we state many similar, but more complicated, results.

We revisit, implement, and experiment with a beautiful algorithm, due to Calabi and Wilf for the random generation of subspaces over a finie field.

Using experimental mathematics and symbolic computation, we derive many moments for the duration of a three player (fair) gambler's ruin.

We extract brilliant ideas of Sandi Klavzar, Michel Mollard, and Marko Petkovsek who used them to solve one very specific enumeration problem, namely counting the number of words in the alphabet {0,1} of length n avoiding two consecutive ones, and having exactly k such neighbors, to a much more general setting where one has any (finite) alphabet, and any (finite) set of forbidden subwords. More important, we fully implement it in Maple.

Using Symbolic Computation with Maple, we can discover lots of (rigorously-proved!) facts about Standard Young Tableaux, in particular the distribution of the entries in any specific cell, and the sorting probabilities.

This is a symbolic-computational redux, and extension, of a beautiful paper, by Harry Dym and Eugene Luks, published in 1966 (but written in 1964) about a certain game with balls and cells.

We use the Jacobi-Trudi formula to execute "explicit" evaluation of determinants of Stirling numbers of both kinds. We also offer a Maple package accompanying the paper on the personal websites at the end of the second page.

How many ways, exactly, can a Chess King, always moving forward (i.e. with steps [1,0],[0,1],[1,1]) walk to [100000,200000]? Thanks to the amazing Apagodu-Zeilberger extension of the Almkvist-Zeilberger algorithm, adapted in this article for combinatorial applications, this 104492-digit number, can be computed in less than 33 seconds. But not just this particular number. Many other numbers that come up in enumerative combinatorics, can be computed just as efficiently

Using recurrences gotten from the Apagodu-Zeilberger Multivariate Almkvist-Zeilberger algorithm we present a linear-time, and constant-space, algorithm to compute the general mixed moments of the k-variate general normal distribution, with any covariance matrix, for any specific k. Besides their obvious importance in statistics, these numbers are also very significant in enumerative combinatorics, since they count in how many ways, in a species with k different genders, a bunch of individuals can all get married, keeping track of the different kinds of heterosexual marriages. We completely implement our algorithm (with an accompanying Maple package, MVNM.txt) for the bivariate and trivariate cases (and hence taking care of our own 2-sex society and a putative 3-sex society), but alas, the actual recurrences for larger k took too long for us to compute. We leave them as computational challenges.

Arthur Cayley famously proved that there are n to the power n-2 labeled trees on n vertices. Here we go much further and show how to enumerate, fully automatically, labeled trees such that every vertex has a number of neighbors that belongs to a specified finite set, and also count trees where the number of neighbors is not allowed to be in a given finite set. We also give detailed statistical analysis, and show that in the sample space of labeled trees with n vertices, the random variable "number of vertices with d neighbors" is asymptotically normal, and for any different degrees, are jointly asymptotically normal, but of course, not independently so (except for the pair (1,3), i.e. the number of leaves and the number of degree-3 vertices, where there are asymptotically independent). We also give new proofs to Amram Meir and John Noon's expressions for the limiting expectation and variance for these, and derive an explicit expression for the covariance.

In this article, dedicated to the memory of Ron Graham, we fully automate John P. D'Angelo's method for studying complete polynomial sequences, for which Ron Graham, back in 1964, gave a beautiful necessary and sufficient conditions. D'Angelo found surprising connection of these elementary (but deep) number-theoretic questions to determining certain critical dimensions in complex geometry.