arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study in depth a certain permutation statistic that was the subject of a brilliant insight by 12-year-old Noga Alon. Our approach is purely empirical and experimental, yet it is fully rigorous, thereby debunking, yet another time, the myth that mathematics is always a deductive science. This revised version contains three postscripts describing improvements pointed out by Stoyan Dimitrov, Kyle Petersen, and Martin Rubey.

In a recent insightful article, Helmut Prodinger uses sophisticated complex analysis, with residues, to derive convolution identities for Fibonacci, Tribonacci, and k-bonacci numbers. Here we use a naive, "experimental mathematics" (yet fully rogorous!) approach, using the C-finite ansatz, that can derive such identities in a few seconds, but not just for the above-mentioned sequences, but for every C-finite sequence (i.e. a sequence satisfying a linear recurrence with constant coefficients), and even for a pair of these.

A few years ago, Peter Larcombe discovered an amazing property regarding two by two matrices. For any such 2 by 2 matrix A, the ratios of the two anti-diagonal entries is the same for all powers of A. We discuss extensions to higher dimensions, and give a short bijective proof of Larcombe and Eric Fennessey's elegant extension to tri-diagonal matrices of arbitrary dimension. This article is accompanied by a Maple package.

We give a short and insightful proof of Gerry Leversha's elegant theorem regarding the isogonal conjugates of each of the vertices of a non-cyclic quadrilateral with respect to the triangle formed by the other three. It uses the Maple package RENE.txt, available from . http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/tokhniot/RENE.txt

We numerically estimate the critical exponents of certain enumeration sequences that naturally generalize the famous Catalan and super-Catalan sequences, and raise deep and original questions about their exact values, and whether they are rational numbers. In this version we announce that our questions were brilliantly answered by Michael Wallner, and that the pledged donation to the OEIS, in his honor, was made.

In a delightful article, Richard Stanley derived, algebraically, the surprisingly simple formula, 3 times 7 to the power n-1, for the sum of the cubes of the n-th row of Stern's diatomic array. In this note, we find an elegant bijective proof of this surprising fact, that explains it and gives insight. The novelty is that this gorgeous bijection was discovered by a computer (SBE), with minimal guidance by a human (DZ). This debunks the conventional wisdom, held by some human supremacists, that computers can only compute, but they can't give insight

Using Symbolic Dynamic Programming we describe algorithms, fully implemented in Maple, for automatically generating generating functions introduced by Richard Stanley in his study of generalized Stern arrays, generalized even further, to arrays defined in terms of general sequences satisfying linear recurrences with constant coefficients, rather than just the Fibonacci and k-bonacci sequences

In this memorial tribute to Joe Gillis, who taught us that Special Functions count, we show how the seminal Even-Gillis integral formula for the number of derangements of a multiset, in terms of Laguerre polynomials, can be used to efficiently compute not only the number of the title, but much harder ones, when it is interfaced with Wilf-Zeilberger algorithmic proof theory.

We present two proofs each, all shorter than the original proofs, of two elegant combinatorial identities that came up in the beautiful article arXiv:2010.00077 .

In Ramanujan's Lost Notebook there is an amazing identity that furnishes infinitely many "almost counterexamples" to the cubic Fermat's Last Theorem, with no indication whatsoever how he discovered it. In 1995, Michael Hirschhorn explained, in a brilliant way, how Ramanujan may have done it, based on a certain polynomial identity for a sum of four cubes. Much earlier, Eri Jabotinsky, in an article published in 1946 (in a mathematics journal for teenagers) explained how Ramanujan may have discovered these polynomial identities needed for Hirschhorn's approach. Here we combine these two brilliant ideas (that may or may not have been how Ramanujan did it), automate it, and generalize, by developing an algorithm to solve a large class of cubic diophantine equations. Our interest in this problem was rekindled after reading Amy Alznauer's (b. Andrews) delightful children book "The Boy Who Dreamed of Infinity" (Candlewick Press), 2020, where Ramanujan's identity appears in one of the illustrations.

We investigate the notion of almost avoiding a permutation: $π$ almost avoids $β$ if one can remove a single entry from $π$ to obtain a $β$-avoiding permutation.

Dyck paths are one of the most important objects in enumerative combinatorics, and there are many papers devoted to counting selected families of Dyck paths. Here we present two approaches for the automatic counting of many such families, using both a "dumb" approach (driven by numeric dynamic programming) that often works in practice, and a "clever" approach, needed for larger problems, driven by "symbolic" dynamic programming. Both approaches are fully automated and implemented in Maple.

In a delightful article that recently appeared in the American Mathematics Monthly, Norbert Henze and Guenter Last discuss the "Absent-Minded Passengers" Problem, but left open finding an explicit expression for the probability generating function, of the random variable "Number of passengers occupying a wrong seat", when the number of absent-minded passengers is larger than one. This is accomplished in this note, using experimental mathematics and symbolic computation. We also derive explicit expressions for the first 8 moments of the original case of one absent-minded passenger, and indicate how to extend it to the general case

In a delightful article that recently appeared in Mathematics Magazine, David and Lori Mccune analyze the board game "Count Your Chickens!", recommended to children three and up. Alas, they use the advanced theory of Markov chains, that presupposes a knowledge of linear algebra, that few three-years-olds are likely to understand. Here we present a much simpler, more intuitive, approach, that while unlikely to be understood by three-year-olds, will probably be understood by a smart 14-year-old. Moreover, our approach accomplishes much more, and is more efficient. It uses symbolic, rather than numeric computation.

In 1980 Otto G. Ruehr made some puzzling comments that a certain identity A, that he proved, is equivalent to another identity B, but he did not explain why they are equivalent. Recently J.-P. Allouche tried to explain why they are "equivalent", using about eight pages. We comment that it is extremely unlikely to be Ruehr's reasoning (he probably got mixed up with a different problem), but be that as it may, it is not worthwhile to try and deduce B from A, since both A and B are routinely provable using Wilf-Zeilberger algorithmic proof theory (implemented in Maple) and the Almkvist-Zeilberger algorithm.

One of the greatest algorithms of all time is Quicksort. Its average running time is famously O(nlog(n)), and its variance, less famously, is O(n^2) (hence its standard deviation is O(n)). But what about higher moments? Here we find explicit expressions for the first eight moments, their scaled limits, and we describe how to compute, approximately (but very accurately), percentiles of running time for any list-length

At the Jan. 2018 Joint Mathematics Meetings, Avi Wigderson gave a series of three fascinating lectures whose starting point was the Sinkhorn algorithm. One of the people in the audience was Mel Nathanson, and this lead him to ask some intriguing questions, some of which we answer in this note.

In Gert Almkvist's beautiful article, entitled "Invariants, mostly old ones", (that appeared in the Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 86 (1980), pp. 1-13) he talked about a sequence of generating functions that came up in his work, that turned out to be the same as generating functions for the number of covariants of binary quadratic forms studied by Faa de Bruno, Cayley, Sylvester, and other 19th century savantes. Using a very simple-minded Maple program (that uses the partial-fraction decomposition of a rational function), we recompute them, and go all the way to degree 18. It turns out that the same method can be used to answer many other enumeration questions, including the one in the title.

Suppose that your mother gave you n candies. You have to eat at least one candy each day. One possibility is to eat all n of them the first day. The other extreme is to make them last n days, and only eat one candy a day. Altogether, you have, famously, 2 to the power n-1 choices. If each such choice is equally likely, what is the probability that you never have three consecutive days, where in the first day you ate at least 2 candies, in the second day you ate at least 5 candies, and in the third day you ate at least 3 candies? This article describes algorithms, fully implemented in two Maple packages, to answer such important questions, and more general ones, of this kind.

We use a "reverse engineering" method, pioneered by George Andrews, to discover an explicit expression for the determinant of a certain tridiagonal matrix discussed by Derrick Henry Lehmer in 1974, that lead to OEIS sequence A039924. Lehmer only did the infinite case, and here we also do the finite case, that immediately implies the former by taking the limit as n goes to infinity