arXiv++ Combinatorics

In this case-study in computer-human collaboration, we develop, implement, and execute symbolic-computational algorithms for the automatic discovery and proof of explicit expressions for the expectation, variance, and higher moments of a large class of natural combinatorial statistics defined on Catalan-counted objects, enabling, inter-alia, to prove that they are not asymptotically normal. In particular, we reproduce in 0.12 seconds results of Miklos Bona, and derive far deeper results, way beyond the scope of humans, concerning higher moments of the random variable "number of occurrences of a pattern" in the set of 132-avoiding permutations for all patterns of length 2 and 3, and, more impressively, explicit expressions for the averages for all patterns of lengths up to 10. The ample output inspired us to make an intriguing conjecture concerning the number of so-called Bona classes, and we pledge to donate 100 dollars to the OEIS Foundation in honor of the prover (or disprover).

We show how to extend the Karolyi-Nagy beautiful proof of the Zeilberger-Bressoud q-Dyson theorem, (first proved by Zeilberger and Bressoud in 1985, and originally conjectured by George Andrews in 1975), that states that the constant term of a certain Laurent polynomial equals the q-multinomial coefficient, how to evaluate any other specific coefficient. The algorithm implies that any such coefficient is always a certain rational function (that the algorithm finds) times the q-multinomial coefficient.

One of the greatest experimental mathematicians of all time was also one of the greatest mathematicians of all time, the great Leonhard Euler. Usually he had an uncanny intuition on how many "special cases" one needs before one can formulate a plausible conjecture, but one time he was "almost fooled", only to find out that his conjecture was premature. In 1990, George Andrews found a way to "correct" Euler. Here we show how to generate, AUTOMATICALLY, rigorously-proved Euler-Andrews Style formulas, that enables one to generate Euler-style "cautionary tales" about the "danger" of using naive empirical induction. Ironically, the way we prove the Andrews-style corrections is empirical! But in order to turn the empirical proof into a full-fledged rigorous proof, we must make sure that we check sufficiently many (but still not that many!) special cases.

Jacobi said "man muss immer umkehren". And indeed it takes a genius like Michael Somos to take a specific non-linear recurrence, like a(n)=(a(n-1)a(n-3)+a(n-2)^2)/a(n-4), subject to a(1)=1, a(2)=1, a(3)=1, a(4)=1, and observe that surprise, surprise, they always generate integers. Then it takes other geniuses to actually prove this fact (and the more general so-called Laurent phenomenon). But let's follow Jacobi's advise and go backwards. Rather than try to shoot a target fifty meters away, and most probably miss it, let's shoot first, and then draw the bull'e eye. Then we are guaranteed to be champion target-shooters. So let's take a sequence of integers that manifestly and obviously only consists of integers, and ask our beloved computers to find non-linear recurrences satisfied by the sequence itself, or by well-defined subsequences.

The brilliant idea of Jean Betrema and Jean-Guy Penaud that proved the celebrated "three to the power n" theorem of Dominique Gouyou-Beauchamps and Xavier Viennot, counting towers of domino pieces is extended and used to enumerate much more general towers, where the pieces can be many i-mers.

The deductive method ruled mathematics for the last 2500 years, now it is the turn of the inductive method. Here we make a modest start by using the inductive method to discover and prove (rigorously) explicit generating functions for the number of dimer (and monomer-dimer) tilings of large families of "skinny" plane regions.

In how many ways can you place n chocolate pieces all of different sizes in an n by n chocolate box, in such a way that when you go from left to right and from top to bottom, there are no gaps AND the sizes increase along each row and each column? The answer is the well-known OEIS Sequence Number 85. To our amazement, the analogous sequence for a three-dimensional chocolate box was not there. Here we fill this gap, and more importantly, offer some computational and theoretical challenges about enumerating families of Solid Standard Young Tableaux.

Yet another example where "physical" (i.e. only checking finitely many special cases) gives a fully rigorous proof, notwithstanding what your "Intro To Proofs" prof told you!

Richard Stanely proposed, in a recent Amer. Math. Monthly Problem, to prove a nice explicit formula for the generating function for the number of n-letter words in {H,T} that have as many occurrences of HT as HH. In this article, we show how to prove this problem automatically, and ANY problem of that type, regardless of the size of the alphabet and the length of the two chosen strings

Binomial Theorem for (N+n)^r is described with non-commuting variables N and n.

Why bother with fully rigorous proofs when one can very quickly get semi-rigorous ones? Yes, yes, we know how to get a "rigorous" proof of the result stated in the title of this article. One way is the boring, human one, citing some heavy guns of theorems that already exist in the literature. We also know how to get a fully rigorous proof automatically, using the methods in this http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/mamarim/mamarimhtml/georgy.htm neat article (but it would be a little more complicated, since the probability generating polynomial is not "closed form" but satisfies a second-order recurrence gotten from the Zeilberger algorithm), otherwise the same method would work, alas, it is not yet implemented. Instead, we chose to use the great Maple package http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/tokhniot/HISTABRUT">HISTABRUT(in fact, a very tiny part of it, procedure AlphaSeq), explained in this other http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/mamarim/mamarimhtml/histabrut.html">neat article, and get a semi-rigorous proof. We also needed the nice little Maple package http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/tokhniot/GuessRat">GuessRat, to do the guessing of rational functions. Equipped with these two packages, Zeilberger wrote a short Maple program http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/tokhniot/SameSexMarriages">SameSexMarriages that enabled the author to generate this paper.

This short article, dedicated to our beloved guru Philippe FLAJOLET (1948-2011), is a case-study in computer-generated combinatorial research, where the computer, all by itself, is using the transfer-matrix method to derive (rigorously!) rational generating functions for chromatic polynomials for infinite sequences of graphs generalizing the action of taking the Cartesian product with a path of length n, n=1,2,... .

This short article answers a question asked by Bruce Sagan in the last few minutes of his wonderful talk (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fdn890jg2U0), (describing joint work with Carla Savage) at the Rutgers University Experimental Mathematics seminar delivered on Dec. 9, 2010.

This is an etude in experimental semi-rigorous (rigorizable!) mathematics. The leading asymptotics was brilliantly derived by Allan Berele and Amitai Regev for general hooks H(k,l) and general powers z, but what about more refined asymptotics? For small k and l, one can "guess" a linear recurrence (since we live in the holonomic ansatz) and using the Birkhoff-Trjitzinsky method, beautifully implemented in Doron Zeilberger's Maple package AsyRec (that has been incorporated into the present Maple package), we computed amazing refined asymptotics, that confirm, with a vengeance, the Berele-Regev asymptotic formula, and especially the impressive constant in front!

Richard Stanley proved that the centralized/normalized version of the random variable "length of largest up-down subsequence" in a random permutation of length n is asymptotically normal. We go beyond and present a more refined asymptotic formula for the moments.

We prove, via 30 seconds of Maple computation, that there are 10^n words in the alphabet {3,-2} of length 5n, sum 0, and such that every factor that sums to 0 and that starts with a 3 may not be immediately followed by a -2.

Here we present the reasoning behind, and program to find, the generating functions for the number of permutations in the title. The article duals as the "accompanying" Maple package.

John Horton Conway's Cosmological Theorem, about Audioactive sequences, for which no extant proof existed, is given a computer-generated proof, hopefully for good.

George Andrews's recent challenge to automated identity-proving and the WZ method is dealt with. It is argued that the rivalry between the classical and automated approaches to hypergeometric sums is beneficial to both.

A combinatorial identity that was needed in Ahlgren and Ono's proof of a certain congruence conjecture of Frits Beukers is stated, and a pointer to its WZ proof is given.