arXiv++ Combinatorics

A certain sampling process, concerning an urn with balls of two colors, proposed in 1965 by B.E. Oakley and R.L. Perry, and discussed by Peter Winkler and Martin Gardner, that has an extremely simple answer for the probability, namely the constant function 1/2, has a far more complicated expected duration, that we discover and sketch the proof of. So unlike, for example, the classical gambler's ruin problem, for which both `probability of winning' and `expected duration' have very simple expressions, in this case the expected number of rounds is extremely complicated, and beyond the scope of humans.

In 1970, Statistics giant, Bradley Efron, amazed the world by coming up with a set of four dice, let's call them A,B,C,D, whose faces are marked with [0,0,4,4,4,4], [3,3,3,3,3,3],[2,2,2,2,6,6],[1,1,1,5,5,5] respectively, where die A beats die B, die B beats die C, die C beats die D, but, surprise surprise, die D beats die A! This was an amazing demonstration that "being more likely to win" is not a transitive relation. But that was only one example, and of course, instead of dice, we can use decks of cards, where they are called (by Martin Gardner, who popularized this way back in 1970) , "sucker's bets". Can you find all such examples, with a specified number of decks, and sizes? If you have a computer algebra system (in our case Maple), you sure can! Not only that, we can figure out how likely such sucker bets are, and derive, fully automatically, statistical information!

If you cancel out the digit 6 from the ratio 16/64, you get the right answer by the wrong method. In 1979 R.P. Boas made an extensive study of such "anomalous cancellations" and generated many examples, in many bases. We continue his pioneering work, and generate many more examples, using the Extended Euclidean Algorithm.

The On-Line Encyclopedia Of Integer Sequences , that wonderful resource that most combinatorialists, and many other mathematicians and scientists, use at least once a day, is a treasure trove of mathematical information, and, one of its charms is that it contains many intriguing conjectures. But one should be on one's guard, because some of the conjectures are either already theorems, or can be routinely proved. In this case study we demonstrate, and actually fully implement (in an accompanying Maple package), how to turn many conjectures made in the OEIS by R.J. Mathar, regarding linear recurrences satisfies by a certain class of sequences, into fully rigorously-proved theorems, but we argue, that one should not emulate us, and while it is nice to have one example, of an algorithm to actually construct proofs (that are known to exist by a priori theoretical reasons), life is too short to do it in all cases, and hence we propose a new category for the OEIS, that of "provable conjecture", as opposed to "proved conjecture" (alias theorem).

Pisot sequences (sequences $a_n$ with initial terms $a_0=x, a_1=y$, and defined for $n>1$ by $a_n= \lfloor a_{n-1}^2/a_{n-2} + \frac{1}{2} \rfloor$) often satisfy linear recurrences with constant coefficients that are valid for all $n \geq 0$, but there are also cautionary examples where there is a linear recurrence that is valid for an initial range of values of $n$ but fails to be satisfied beyond that point, providing further illustrations of Richard Guy's celebrated "Strong Law of Small Numbers". In this paper we present a decision algorithm, fully implemented in an accompanying Maple program ({\tt Pisot.txt}), that first searches for a putative linear recurrence and then decides whether or not it holds for all values of $n$. We also explain why the failures happen (in some cases the `fake' linear recurrence may be valid for thousands of terms). We conclude by defining, and studying, higher-order analogs of Pisot sequences, and point out that similar phenomena occur there, albeit far less frequently. This article is dedicated to Richard K. Guy (b. Sept. 30, 1916) on his 100th birthday.

In this tribute to Neil Sloane, we revisit the first sequence in the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, sequence A435 (1, 8, 78, 944, 13800, 237432, 4708144, 105822432, ...), that he encountered when he was a graduate student, and when normalized gives the average total height of rooted labeled trees. We state rigorously-computed explicit expressions for the first twelve moments of the random variable `total height' on rooted labeled trees, and pledge to donate to the OEIS 100 dollars in honor of the first to find an explicit expression for the probability density function of the limiting scaled probability distribution, as n goes to infinity.

Continuing pioneering work of Christophe Doche and Laurent Habsieger from 2004, we develop computer algebra algorithms, implemented in Maple, for finding the (necessarily rational) generating function for any integral of products, and in particular, moments, of Rudin-Shapiro polynomials. We generate a lot of output, and confirm again a conjecture of Saffari for the asymptotics for small (and not so small) powers. We also confirm, for small powers, a related, more general, conjecture, of Hugh Montgomery. Finally, we outline a proof of Saffari's full conjecture, that we believe can be turned into a full proof. [In this version we report that Brad Rodgers has independently found a (complete!) proof of Saffari's conjecture here http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.01637] .

Shmuel Friedland and Giorgio Ottaviani's beautiful constant term expression for the number of singular vector tuples of generic tensors is used to derive a rational generating function for these numbers, that in turn, is used to obtain an asymptotic formula for the number of such tuples for n by n by n three-dimensional tensors, and to conjecture an asymptotic formula for the general d-dimensional case. A donation of 100 dollars, in honor of the first prover, will be made to the On-line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences.

We show how the continuous Almkvist-Zeilberger algorithm can be used to efficiently discover and prove differential equations satisfied by generating functions of sequences defined as integrals of powers of C-finite polynomial sequences (like the Chebyshev polynomials) from which one can automatically derive linear recurrences with polynomial coefficients for the sequences themselves. We fully implement this with a Maple package, CfiniteIntergal.txt .

In this short article, two recent beautiful proofs of George Andrews, Aviezri Fraenkel, and James Sellers, about the mod m characterization of the number of m-ary partitions are simplified and streamlined, and then generalized to handle many more cases, and prove much deeper theorems, with the help of computers, of course.

A set of arithmetical sequences $$ a_1\, (\bmod{ \,\, m_1}) \quad, \quad a_2 \, (\bmod{\,\, m_2}) \quad, \quad \dots \quad , \quad a_k \, (\bmod{\,\,m_k}) \quad \quad , $$ with $$ m_1 \leq m_2 \leq \dots \leq m_k \quad \quad , $$ is called a {\it disjoint covering system} (alias {\it exact covering system}) if every positive integer belongs to {\bf exactly} one of the sequences. Mirski, Newman, Davenport and Rado famously proved that the moduli can't all be distinct. In fact the two largest moduli must be equal, i.e. $m_{k-1}=m_k$ This raises the natural question:"How close can you get to getting distinct moduli?", in other words, can you find all such systems where all the moduli are distinct except the largest, that is repeated $r$ times, for any, specific given $r$? It turns out (conjecturally, but almost certainly) that excluding the trivial case where the smallest modulus is 2, for any number of repeats $r$, there are only finitely many such systems. Marc Berger, Alexander Felzenbaum and Aviezri Fraenkel found them all for $r$ up to $9$, and Mekmamu Zeleke and Jamie Simpson extended the list for systems up to $12$ repeats. In the present article we continue the list up to $r=32$. All our systems are correct, but we did not bother to formally prove completeness, but we know for sure that the lists are complete if the largest modulus is $\leq 600$, and we are pretty sure that they are complete.

Jaclyn Anderson proved that if s and t are relatively prime positive integers, then there are exactly (s+t-1)!/(s!t!) partitions whose set of hook-lengths is disjoint from the set {s,t}. Drew Armstrong conjectured (and Paul Johnson, and a bit later, Victor Wang, proved) a beautiful expression for the average size, namely (s-1)(t-1)(s+t+1)/24 . In the present article, we go far beyond the average, and state absolutely certain expressions (but "officially" still conjectures) for the variance (showing in particular that it is rather large, and there is no "concentration about the mean"), and the third through the sixth moments. For the special case of (s,s+1)-core partitions, we go all the way to the 9th moment. We pose two challenges, and will be glad to donate 100 dollars each, to the OEIS foundation in honor of the first provers, regarding a "soft" and "global", yet rigorous, justification of our empirical approach, and for proving an intriguing conjecture about the limiting distribution. This version reports (thanks to Marko Thiel and Nathan Williams) that the second challenge mentioned above has been done by Paul Johnson (but not in two pages). A donation to the OEIS was made. The first challenge is still wide open.

We use the Robinson-Schensted correspondence, followed by symbol-crunching, in order to derive explicit expressions for the quantities mentioned in the title. We follow it by number crunching, in order to compute the first terms of these sequences. As an encore, we cleverly implement Ira Gessel's celebrated determinant formula for the generating functions of these sequences, to crank out many terms. This modest tribute is dedicated to one of the greatest enumerators alive today (and definitely the most modest one!), Ira Martin Gessel, who is turning 64 years-old today

An "odd-rule" cellular automaton (CA) is defined by specifying a neighborhood for each cell, with the rule that a cell turns ON if it is in the neighborhood of an odd number of ON cells at the previous generation, and otherwise turns OFF. We classify all the odd-rule CAs defined by neighborhoods which are subsets of a 3 X 3 grid of square cells. There are 86 different CAs modulo trivial symmetries. When we consider only the different sequences giving the number of ON cells after n generations, the number drops to 48, two of which are the Moore and von Neumann CAs. This classification is carried out by using the "meta-algorithm" described in an earlier paper to derive the generating functions for the 86 sequences, and then removing duplicates. The fastest-growing of these CAs is neither the Fredkin nor von Neumann neighborhood, but instead is one defined by "Odd-rule" 365, which turns ON almost 75% of all possible cells.

We develop a meta-algorithm that, given a polynomial (in one or more variables), and a prime p, produces a fast (logarithmic time) algorithm that takes a positive integer n and outputs the number of times each residue class modulo p appears as a coefficient when the polynomial is raised to the power n and the coefficients are read modulo p.

The problems of enumerating lattice walks, with an arbitrary finite set of allowed steps, both in one and two dimensions, where one must always stay in the non-negative half-line and quarter-plane respectively, are used, as case studies, to illustrate the `naive' methodology of guess-and-check, where rigorous proofs are possible, but not worth the trouble. We argue that this is a metaphor for future math.

In this article, dedicated with admiration and gratitude to guru Neil Sloane on his 75-th birthday, we observe that the generating functions for multi-set permutations that do not contain an increasing subsequence of length d, and where every letter appears the same number of times, say r, are always D-finite, (for every d and every r), and we actually crank out the first few terms of quite a few of them, many of whom are not yet in the OEIS. We also state a conjectured asymptotic formula for these sequences, that reduces to Amitai Regev's famous formula when r=1, and pledge a 100 dollar donation to the OEIS in honor of the first one to prove our conjecture. We pledge another 100 dollars for extending Ira Gessel's spectacular Bessel determinant, from the r=1 case to general r.

Once upon a time there was an esoteric and specialized notion, called "size of the Durfee square", of interest to at most 100 specialists in the whole world. Then it was kissed by a prince called Jorge Hirsch, and became the famous (and to quite a few people, infamous) h-index, of interest to every scientist, and scholar, since it tells you how productive a scientist (or scholar) you are! When Rodney Canfield, Sylvie Corteel, and Carla Savage wrote their beautiful 1998 article proving, rigorously, by a very deep and intricate analysis, the asymptotic normality of the random variable "size of Durfee square" defined on integer-partitions of n (as n goes to infinity), with precise asymptotics for the mean and variance, they did not dream that one day their result should be of interest to everyone who has ever published a paper. However Canfield et. al. had to work really hard to prove their deep result. Here we take an "empirical" shortcut, that proves the same thing much faster (modulo routine number- and symbol- crunching). More importantly, the empirical methodology should be useful in many other cases where rigorous proofs are either too hard, or not worth the trouble!

This short tribute to the guru of Enumerative and Algebraic Combinatorics started out when one the authors(DZ) attended the Stanely@70 conference, that took place at the same time as the preliminary stage of the 2014 World Cup. It states a surprising application of an analog of Richard Stanley's famous theorem about the enumeration of magic squares to the enumeration of possible outcomes in a World Cup Group.

Joshua Cooper and Mark Walters initiated the subject that we call here Enumerative Geometric Genealogy, (and that lead to the hard-to-count OEIS sequence A140468) but they did not realize the broader impact of their research to the population explosion of a certain far-away planet, whose inhabitants are much smarter, and more civilized, than we are.