arXiv++ Combinatorics

Trace reconstruction considers the task of recovering an unknown string $x \in \{0,1\}^n$ given a number of independent "traces", i.e., subsequences of $x$ obtained by randomly and independently deleting every symbol of $x$ with some probability $p$. The information-theoretic limit of the number of traces needed to recover a string of length $n$ is still unknown. This limit is essentially the same as the number of traces needed to determine, given strings $x$ and $y$ and traces of one of them, which string is the source. The most-studied class of algorithms for the worst-case version of the problem are "mean-based" algorithms. These are a restricted class of distinguishers that only use the mean value of each coordinate on the given samples. In this work we study limitations of mean-based algorithms on strings at small Hamming or edit distance. We show that, on the one hand, distinguishing strings that are nearby in Hamming distance is "easy" for such distinguishers. On the other hand, we show that distinguishing strings that are nearby in edit distance is "hard" for mean-based algorithms. Along the way, we also describe a connection to the famous Prouhet-Tarry-Escott (PTE) problem, which shows a barrier to finding explicit hard-to-distinguish strings: namely such strings would imply explicit short solutions to the PTE problem, a well-known difficult problem in number theory. Furthermore, we show that the converse is also true, thus, finding explicit solutions to the PTE problem is equivalent to the problem of finding explicit strings that are hard-to-distinguish by mean-based algorithms. Our techniques rely on complex analysis arguments that involve careful trigonometric estimates, and algebraic techniques that include applications of Descartes' rule of signs for polynomials over the reals.

Lattices are discrete mathematical objects with widespread applications to integer programs as well as modern cryptography. A fundamental problem in both domains is the Closest Vector Problem (popularly known as CVP). It is well-known that CVP can be easily solved in lattices that have an orthogonal basis \emph{if} the orthogonal basis is specified. This motivates the orthogonality decision problem: verify whether a given lattice has an orthogonal basis. Surprisingly, the orthogonality decision problem is not known to be either NP-complete or in P. In this paper, we focus on the orthogonality decision problem for a well-known family of lattices, namely Construction-A lattices. These are lattices of the form $C+q\mathbb{Z}^n$, where $C$ is an error-correcting $q$-ary code, and are studied in communication settings. We provide a complete characterization of lattices obtained from binary and ternary codes using Construction-A that have an orthogonal basis. We use this characterization to give an efficient algorithm to solve the orthogonality decision problem. Our algorithm also finds an orthogonal basis if one exists for this family of lattices. We believe that these results could provide a better understanding of the complexity of the orthogonality decision problem for general lattices.

Call a function f : F_2^n -> {0,1} odd-cycle-free if there are no x_1, ..., x_k in F_2^n with k an odd integer such that f(x_1) = ... = f(x_k) = 1 and x_1 + ... + x_k = 0. We show that one can distinguish odd-cycle-free functions from those eps-far from being odd-cycle-free by making poly(1/eps) queries to an evaluation oracle. To obtain this result, we use connections between basic Fourier analysis and spectral graph theory to show that one can reduce testing odd-cycle-freeness of Boolean functions to testing bipartiteness of dense graphs. Our work forms part of a recent sequence of works that shows connections between testability of properties of Boolean functions and of graph properties. We also prove that there is a canonical tester for odd-cycle-freeness making poly(1/eps) queries, meaning that the testing algorithm operates by picking a random linear subspace of dimension O(log 1/eps) and then checking if the restriction of the function to the subspace is odd-cycle-free or not. The test is analyzed by studying the effect of random subspace restriction on the Fourier coefficients of a function. Our work implies that testing odd-cycle-freeness using a canonical tester instead of an arbitrary tester incurs no more than a polynomial blowup in the query complexity. The question of whether a canonical tester with polynomial blowup exists for all linear-invariant properties remains an open problem.

The study of the interplay between the testability of properties of Boolean functions and the invariances acting on their domain which preserve the property was initiated by Kaufman and Sudan (STOC 2008). Invariance with respect to F_2-linear transformations is arguably the most common symmetry exhibited by natural properties of Boolean functions on the hypercube. Hence, an important goal in Property Testing is to describe necessary and sufficient conditions for the testability of linear-invariant properties. This direction was explicitly proposed for investigation in a recent survey of Sudan. We obtain the following results: 1. We show that every linear-invariant property that can be characterized by forbidding induced solutions to a (possibly infinite) set of linear equations can be tested with one-sided error. 2. We show that every linear-invariant property that can be tested with one-sided error can be characterized by forbidding induced solutions to a (possibly infinite) set of systems of linear equations. We conjecture that our result from item (1) can be extended to cover systems of linear equations. We further show that the validity of this conjecture would have the following implications: 1. It would imply that every linear-invariant property that is closed under restrictions to linear subspaces is testable with one-sided error. Such a result would unify several previous results on testing Boolean functions, such as the testability of low-degree polynomials and of Fourier dimensionality. 2. It would imply that a linear-invariant property P is testable with one-sided error if and only if P is closed under restrictions to linear subspaces, thus resolving Sudan's problem.