Papers by Eric Sedgwick
4 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Spiraling and Folding: The Topological View
Published in Discrete and Computational Geometry 72 (2024), no. 1, 246-268
• View Publication
• BIB
For every $n$, we construct two curves in the plane that intersect at least $n$ times and do not form spirals. The construction is in three stages: we first exhibit closed curves on the torus that do not form double spirals, then arcs on the torus that do not form spirals, and finally pairs of planar arcs that do not form spirals. These curves provide a counterexample to a proof of Pach and Tóth concerning string graphs.
Hard Diagrams of the Unknot
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
We present three "hard" diagrams of the unknot. They require (at least) three extra crossings before they can be simplified to the trivial unknot diagram via Reidemeister moves in $\mathbb{S}^2$. Both examples are constructed by applying previously proposed methods. The proof of their hardness uses significant computational resources. We also determine that no small "standard" example of a hard unknot diagram requires more than one extra crossing for Reidemeister moves in $\mathbb{S}^2$.
Collection of abstracts of the Workshop on Triangulations in Geometry and Topology at CG Week 2014 in Kyoto
This workshop about triangulations of manifolds in computational geometry and topology was held at the 2014 CG-Week in Kyoto, Japan.
It focussed on computational and combinatorial questions regarding triangulations, with the goal of bringing together researchers working on various aspects of triangulations and of fostering a closer collaboration within the computational geometry and topology community.
Triangulations are highly suitable for computations due to their clear combinatorial structure. As a consequence, they have been successfully employed in discrete algorithms to solve purely theoretical problems in a broad variety of mathematical research areas (knot theory, polytope theory, 2- and 3-manifold topology, geometry, and others). However, due to the large variety of applications, requirements vary from field to field and thus different types of triangulations, different tools, and different frameworks are used in different areas of research. This is why today closely related research areas are sometimes largely disjoint leaving potential reciprocal benefits unused.
To address these potentials a workshop on Triangulations was held at Oberwolfach Research Institute in 2012. Since then many new collaborations between researchers of different mathematical communities have been established. Regarding the computational geometry community, the theory of manifolds continues to contribute to advances in more applied areas of the field. Many researchers are interested in fundamental mathematical research about triangulations and thus will benefit from a broad set of knowledge about different research areas using different techniques.
We hope that this workshop brought together researchers from many different fields of computational geometry to have fruitful discussions which will lead to new interdisciplinary collaborations and solutions.
Untangling two systems of noncrossing curves
We consider two systems of curves $(α_1,...,α_m)$ and $(β_1,...,β_n)$ drawn on a compact two-dimensional surface $M$ with boundary.
Each $α_i$ and each $β_j$ is either an arc meeting the boundary of $M$ at its two endpoints, or a closed curve. The $α_i$ are pairwise disjoint except for possibly sharing endpoints, and similarly for the $β_j$. We want to "untangle" the $β_j$ from the $α_i$ by a self-homeomorphism of $M$; more precisely, we seek a homeomorphism $φ:M\rightarrow M$ fixing the boundary of $M$ pointwise such that the total number of crossings of the $α_i$ with the $φ(β_j)$ is as small as possible. This problem is motivated by an application in the algorithmic theory of embeddings and 3-manifolds.
We prove that if $M$ is planar, i.e., a sphere with $h\geq 0$ boundary components ("holes"), then $O(mn)$ crossings can be achieved (independently of $h$), which is asymptotically tight, as an easy lower bound shows.
In general, for an arbitrary (orientable or nonorientable) surface $M$ with $h$ holes and of (orientable or nonorientable) genus $g$, we obtain an $O((m+n)^4)$ upper bound, again independent of $h$ and $g$.
The proofs rely, among others, on a result concerning simultaneous planar drawings of graphs by Erten and Kobourov.