arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Untangling two systems of noncrossing curves

Published: 2013-02-26 | Updated: 2014-03-07
Comments: 30 pages, 20 figures; the proof of the existence of a suitable orientation-enabling cycle was simplified by several pages (the homology based argument was replaced with a local orientation argument following a suggestion of an anonymous referee)

Abstract

We consider two systems of curves $(α_1,...,α_m)$ and $(β_1,...,β_n)$ drawn on a compact two-dimensional surface $M$ with boundary. Each $α_i$ and each $β_j$ is either an arc meeting the boundary of $M$ at its two endpoints, or a closed curve. The $α_i$ are pairwise disjoint except for possibly sharing endpoints, and similarly for the $β_j$. We want to "untangle" the $β_j$ from the $α_i$ by a self-homeomorphism of $M$; more precisely, we seek a homeomorphism $φ:M\rightarrow M$ fixing the boundary of $M$ pointwise such that the total number of crossings of the $α_i$ with the $φ(β_j)$ is as small as possible. This problem is motivated by an application in the algorithmic theory of embeddings and 3-manifolds. We prove that if $M$ is planar, i.e., a sphere with $h\geq 0$ boundary components ("holes"), then $O(mn)$ crossings can be achieved (independently of $h$), which is asymptotically tight, as an easy lower bound shows. In general, for an arbitrary (orientable or nonorientable) surface $M$ with $h$ holes and of (orientable or nonorientable) genus $g$, we obtain an $O((m+n)^4)$ upper bound, again independent of $h$ and $g$. The proofs rely, among others, on a result concerning simultaneous planar drawings of graphs by Erten and Kobourov.

BibTeX

Loading...