arXiv++ Combinatorics

Over a decade ago, Koolen, Hayat, and Iqbal posed the problem of whether the distance spectrum determines bipartiteness within the class of connected graphs. In this paper, we resolve this problem in the negative: we explicitly construct an infinite family of counterexamples, where each pair comprises a connected bipartite graph and a connected non-bipartite graph with equal distance spectra.

A graph \(G\) is said to be \emph{determined by its spectrum} if every graph cospectral with \(G\) is isomorphic to \(G\). A \emph{T-shape tree} is defined as a tree containing exactly one vertex of maximum degree three. For any three positive integers \(\ell_1\),\(\ell_2\) and \(\ell_3\) with \( \ell_1\leq \ell_2\leq \ell_3\), we denote by \(T(\ell_1,\ell_2,\ell_3)\) the unique \(T\)-shape tree such that deleting its degree-three vertex \(v\) yields three disjoint paths \(P_{\ell_1}\), \(P_{\ell_2}\), and \(P_{\ell_3}\), i.e., \(T(\ell_1,\ell_2,\ell_3)-v = P_{\ell_1}\cup P_{\ell_2}\cup P_{\ell_3}\), where \(P_k\) stands for the path graph on \(k\) vertices. In this paper, we establish a complete spectral characterization for the complements of \(T\)-shape trees, settling a long-standing conjecture posed by Wang and Xu (2006). Specifically, we prove that the complement of \(T(\ell_1,\ell_2,\ell_3)\) is spectrally determined if and only if \((\ell_1,\ell_2,\ell_3) \notin \{(\ell,\ell,2\ell-2):\ell\ge2\}\). Moreover, all cospectral mates of the complement of the \(T\)-shape tree \(T(\ell,\ell,2\ell-2)\) are identified for every integer \(\ell\geq 2\).