arXiv++ Combinatorics

The metric dimension of a graph is the minimum size of a set of vertices such that each vertex is uniquely determined by the distances to the vertices of that set. Our aim is to upper-bound the order $n$ of a graph in terms of its diameter $d$ and metric dimension $k$. In general, the bound $n\leq d^k+k$ is known to hold. We prove a bound of the form $n=\mathcal{O}(kd^2)$ for trees and outerplanar graphs (for trees we determine the best possible bound and the corresponding extremal examples). More generally, for graphs having a tree decomposition of width $w$ and length $\ell$, we obtain a bound of the form $n=\mathcal{O}(kd^2(2\ell+1)^{3w+1})$. This implies in particular that $n=\mathcal{O}(kd^{\mathcal{O}(1)})$ for graphs of constant treewidth and $n=\mathcal{O}(f(k)d^2)$ for chordal graphs, where $f$ is a doubly-exponential function. Using the notion of distance-VC dimension (introduced in 2014 by Bousquet and Thomassé) as a tool, we prove the bounds $n\leq (dk+1)^{t-1}+1$ for $K_t$-minor-free graphs, and $n\leq (dk+1)^{d(3\cdot 2^{r}+2)}+1$ for graphs of rankwidth at most $r$.

A tropical graph $(H,c)$ consists of a graph $H$ and a (not necessarily proper) vertex-colouring $c$ of $H$. Given two tropical graphs $(G,c_1)$ and $(H,c)$, a homomorphism of $(G,c_1)$ to $(H,c)$ is a standard graph homomorphism of $G$ to $H$ that also preserves the vertex-colours. We initiate the study of the computational complexity of tropical graph homomorphism problems. We consider two settings. First, when the tropical graph $(H,c)$ is fixed; this is a problem called $(H,c)$-COLOURING. Second, when the colouring of $H$ is part of the input; the associated decision problem is called $H$-TROPICAL-COLOURING. Each $(H,c)$-COLOURING problem is a constraint satisfaction problem (CSP), and we show that a complexity dichotomy for the class of $(H,c)$-COLOURING problems holds if and only if the Feder-Vardi Dichotomy Conjecture for CSPs is true. This implies that $(H,c)$-COLOURING problems form a rich class of decision problems. On the other hand, we were successful in classifying the complexity of at least certain classes of $H$-TROPICAL-COLOURING problems.

We study homomorphism problems of signed graphs from a computational point of view. A signed graph $(G,Σ)$ is a graph $G$ where each edge is given a sign, positive or negative; $Σ\subseteq E(G)$ denotes the set of negative edges. Thus, $(G, Σ)$ is a $2$-edge-coloured graph with the property that the edge-colours, $\{+, -\}$, form a group under multiplication. Central to the study of signed graphs is the operation of switching at a vertex, that results in changing the sign of each incident edge. We study two types of homomorphisms of a signed graph $(G,Σ)$ to a signed graph $(H,Π)$: ec-homomorphisms and s-homomorphisms. Each is a standard graph homomorphism of $G$ to $H$ with some additional constraint. In the former, edge-signs are preserved. In the latter, edge-signs are preserved after the switching operation has been applied to a subset of vertices of $G$. We prove a dichotomy theorem for s-homomorphism problems for a large class of (fixed) target signed graphs $(H,Π)$. Specifically, as long as $(H,Π)$ does not contain a negative (respectively a positive) loop, the problem is polynomial-time solvable if the core of $(H,Π)$ has at most two edges, and is NP-complete otherwise. (Note that this covers all simple signed graphs.) The same dichotomy holds if $(H,Π)$ has no negative digons, and we conjecture that it holds always. In our proofs, we reduce s-homomorphism problems to certain ec-homomorphism problems, for which we are able to show a dichotomy. In contrast, we prove that a dichotomy theorem for ec-homomorphism problems (even when restricted to bipartite target signed graphs) would settle the dichotomy conjecture of Feder and Vardi.

We consider the problems of finding optimal identifying codes, (open) locating-dominating sets and resolving sets of an interval or a permutation graph. In these problems, one asks to find a subset of vertices, normally called a \emph{solution} set, using which all vertices of the graph are distinguished. The identification can be done by considering the neighborhood within the solution set, or by employing the distances to the solution vertices. Normally the goal is to minimize the size of the solution set then. Here we study the case of interval graphs, unit interval graphs, (bipartite) permutation graphs and cographs. For these classes of graphs we give tight lower bounds for the size of such solution sets depending on the order of the input graph. While such lower bounds for the general class of graphs are in logarithmic order, the improved bounds in these special classes are of the order of either quadratic root or linear in terms of number of vertices. Moreover, the results for cographs lead to linear-time algorithms to solve the considered problems on inputs that are cographs.

A set $D$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is locating if every two distinct vertices outside $D$ have distinct neighbors in $D$; that is, for distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ outside $D$, $N(u) \cap D \neq N(v) \cap D$, where $N(u)$ denotes the open neighborhood of $u$. If $D$ is also a dominating set (total dominating set), it is called a locating-dominating set (respectively, locating-total dominating set) of $G$. A graph $G$ is twin-free if every two distinct vertices of $G$ have distinct open and closed neighborhoods. It is conjectured [D. Garijo, A. Gonzalez and A. Marquez, The difference between the metric dimension and the determining number of a graph. Applied Mathematics and Computation 249 (2014), 487--501] and [F. Foucaud and M. A. Henning. Locating-total dominating sets in twin-free graphs: a conjecture. The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 23 (2016), P3.9] respectively, that any twin-free graph $G$ without isolated vertices has a locating-dominating set of size at most one-half its order and a locating-total dominating set of size at most two-thirds its order. In this paper, we prove these two conjectures for the class of line graphs. Both bounds are tight for this class, in the sense that there are infinitely many connected line graphs for which equality holds in the bounds.

It was proved by Raychaudhuri in 1987 that if a graph power $G^{k-1}$ is an interval graph, then so is the next power $G^k$. This result was extended to $m$-trapezoid graphs by Flotow in 1995. We extend the statement for interval graphs by showing that any interval representation of $G^{k-1}$ can be extended to an interval representation of $G^k$ that induces the same left endpoint and right endpoint orders. The same holds for unit interval graphs. We also show that a similar fact does not hold for trapezoid graphs.

A total dominating set of a graph $G$ is a set $D$ of vertices of $G$ such that every vertex of $G$ has a neighbor in $D$. A locating-total dominating set of $G$ is a total dominating set $D$ of $G$ with the additional property that every two distinct vertices outside $D$ have distinct neighbors in $D$; that is, for distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ outside $D$, $N(u) \cap D \ne N(v) \cap D$ where $N(u)$ denotes the open neighborhood of $u$. A graph is twin-free if every two distinct vertices have distinct open and closed neighborhoods. The location-total domination number of $G$, denoted $LT(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a locating-total dominating set in $G$. It is well-known that every connected graph of order $n \geq 3$ has a total dominating set of size at most $\frac{2}{3}n$. We conjecture that if $G$ is a twin-free graph of order $n$ with no isolated vertex, then $LT(G) \leq \frac{2}{3}n$. We prove the conjecture for graphs without $4$-cycles as a subgraph. We also prove that if $G$ is a twin-free graph of order $n$, then $LT(G) \le \frac{3}{4}n$.

A dominating set of a graph $G$ is a set $D$ of vertices of $G$ such that every vertex outside $D$ is adjacent to a vertex in $D$. A locating-dominating set of $G$ is a dominating set $D$ of $G$ with the additional property that every two distinct vertices outside $D$ have distinct neighbors in $D$; that is, for distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ outside $D$, $N(u) \cap D \neq N(v) \cap D$ where $N(u)$ denotes the open neighborhood of $u$. A graph is twin-free if every two distinct vertices have distinct open and closed neighborhoods. The location-domination number of $G$, denoted $γ_L(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a locating-dominating set in $G$. Garijo, Gonzalez and Marquez [Applied Math. Computation 249 (2014), 487--501] posed the conjecture that for $n$ sufficiently large, the maximum value of the location-domination number of a twin-free, connected graph on $n$ vertices is equal to $\lfloor \frac{n}{2} \rfloor$. We propose the related (stronger) conjecture that if $G$ is a twin-free graph of order $n$ without isolated vertices, then $γ_L(G)\leq \frac{n}{2}$. We prove the conjecture for cubic graphs. We rely heavily on proof techniques from matching theory to prove our result.

A locating-dominating set of a graph $G$ is a dominating set $D$ of $G$ with the additional property that every two distinct vertices outside $D$ have distinct neighbors in $D$; that is, for distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ outside $D$, $N(u) \cap D \ne N(v) \cap D$ where $N(u)$ denotes the open neighborhood of $u$. A graph is twin-free if every two distinct vertices have distinct open and closed neighborhoods. The location-domination number of $G$, denoted $γ_L(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a locating-dominating set in $G$. It is conjectured [D. Garijo, A. González and A. Márquez. The difference between the metric dimension and the determining number of a graph. Applied Mathematics and Computation 249 (2014), 487--501] that if $G$ is a twin-free graph of order $n$ without isolated vertices, then $γ_L(G)\le \frac{n}{2}$. We prove the general bound $γ_L(G)\le \frac{2n}{3}$, slightly improving over the $\lfloor\frac{2n}{3}\rfloor+1$ bound of Garijo et al. We then provide constructions of graphs reaching the $\frac{n}{2}$ bound, showing that if the conjecture is true, the family of extremal graphs is a very rich one. Moreover, we characterize the trees $G$ that are extremal for this bound. We finally prove the conjecture for split graphs and co-bipartite graphs.

Locating-dominating sets and identifying codes are two closely related notions in the area of separating systems. Roughly speaking, they consist in a dominating set of a graph such that every vertex is uniquely identified by its neighbourhood within the dominating set. In this paper, we study the size of a smallest locating-dominating set or identifying code for graphs of girth at least 5 and of given minimum degree. We use the technique of vertex-disjoint paths to provide upper bounds on the minimum size of such sets, and construct graphs who come close to meet these bounds.

The Grundy number of a graph is the maximum number of colors used by the greedy coloring algorithm over all vertex orderings. In this paper, we study the computational complexity of GRUNDY COLORING, the problem of determining whether a given graph has Grundy number at least $k$. We also study the variants WEAK GRUNDY COLORING (where the coloring is not necessarily proper) and CONNECTED GRUNDY COLORING (where at each step of the greedy coloring algorithm, the subgraph induced by the colored vertices must be connected). We show that GRUNDY COLORING can be solved in time $O^*(2.443^n)$ and WEAK GRUNDY COLORING in time $O^*(2.716^n)$ on graphs of order $n$. While GRUNDY COLORING and WEAK GRUNDY COLORING are known to be solvable in time $O^*(2^{O(wk)})$ for graphs of treewidth $w$ (where $k$ is the number of colors), we prove that under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), they cannot be solved in time $O^*(2^{o(w\log w)})$. We also describe an $O^*(2^{2^{O(k)}})$ algorithm for WEAK GRUNDY COLORING, which is therefore $\fpt$ for the parameter $k$. Moreover, under the ETH, we prove that such a running time is essentially optimal (this lower bound also holds for GRUNDY COLORING). Although we do not know whether GRUNDY COLORING is in $\fpt$, we show that this is the case for graphs belonging to a number of standard graph classes including chordal graphs, claw-free graphs, and graphs excluding a fixed minor. We also describe a quasi-polynomial time algorithm for GRUNDY COLORING and WEAK GRUNDY COLORING on apex-minor graphs. In stark contrast with the two other problems, we show that CONNECTED GRUNDY COLORING is $\np$-complete already for $k=7$ colors.

We introduce the notion of a centroidal locating set of a graph $G$, that is, a set $L$ of vertices such that all vertices in $G$ are uniquely determined by their relative distances to the vertices of $L$. A centroidal locating set of $G$ of minimum size is called a centroidal basis, and its size is the centroidal dimension $CD(G)$. This notion, which is related to previous concepts, gives a new way of identifying the vertices of a graph. The centroidal dimension of a graph $G$ is lower- and upper-bounded by the metric dimension and twice the location-domination number of $G$, respectively. The latter two parameters are standard and well-studied notions in the field of graph identification. We show that for any graph $G$ with $n$ vertices and maximum degree at least~2, $(1+o(1))\frac{\ln n}{\ln\ln n}\leq CD(G) \leq n-1$. We discuss the tightness of these bounds and in particular, we characterize the set of graphs reaching the upper bound. We then show that for graphs in which every pair of vertices is connected via a bounded number of paths, $CD(G)=Ω\left(\sqrt{|E(G)|}\right)$, the bound being tight for paths and cycles. We finally investigate the computational complexity of determining $CD(G)$ for an input graph $G$, showing that the problem is hard and cannot even be approximated efficiently up to a factor of $o(\log n)$. We also give an $O\left(\sqrt{n\ln n}\right)$-approximation algorithm.

We consider the problems of finding optimal identifying codes, (open) locating-dominating sets and resolving sets (denoted IDENTIFYING CODE, (OPEN) LOCATING-DOMINATING SET and METRIC DIMENSION) of an interval or a permutation graph. In these problems, one asks to distinguish all vertices of a graph by a subset of the vertices, using either the neighbourhood within the solution set or the distances to the solution vertices. Using a general reduction for this class of problems, we prove that the decision problems associated to these four notions are NP-complete, even for interval graphs of diameter $2$ and permutation graphs of diameter $2$. While IDENTIFYING CODE and (OPEN) LOCATING-DOMINATING SET are trivially fixed-parameter-tractable when parameterized by solution size, it is known that in the same setting METRIC DIMENSION is $W[2]$-hard. We show that for interval graphs, this parameterization of METRIC DIMENSION is fixed-parameter-tractable.

We study two extremal problems about subgraphs excluding a family $\F$ of graphs. i) Among all graphs with $m$ edges, what is the smallest size $f(m,\F)$ of a largest $\F$--free subgraph? ii) Among all graphs with minimum degree $δ$ and maximum degree $Δ$, what is the smallest minimum degree $h(δ,Δ,\F)$ of a spanning $\F$--free subgraph with largest minimum degree? These questions are easy to answer for families not containing any bipartite graph. We study the case where $\F$ is composed of all even cycles of length at most $2r$, $r\geq 2$. In this case, we give bounds on $f(m,\F)$ and $h(δ,Δ,\F)$ that are essentially asymptotically tight up to a logarithmic factor. In particular for every graph $G$, we show the existence of subgraphs with arbitrarily high girth, and with either many edges or large minimum degree. These subgraphs are created using probabilistic embeddings of a graph into extremal graphs.

An identifying code of a graph is a dominating set which uniquely determines all the vertices by their neighborhood within the code. Whereas graphs with large minimum degree have small domination number, this is not the case for the identifying code number (the size of a smallest identifying code), which indeed is not even a monotone parameter with respect to graph inclusion. We show that every graph $G$ with $n$ vertices, maximum degree $Δ=ω(1)$ and minimum degree $δ\geq c\logΔ$, for some constant $c>0$, contains a large spanning subgraph which admits an identifying code with size $O\left(\frac{n\logΔ}δ\right)$. In particular, if $δ=Θ(n)$, then $G$ has a dense spanning subgraph with identifying code $O\left(\log n\right)$, namely, of asymptotically optimal size. The subgraph we build is created using a probabilistic approach, and we use an interplay of various random methods to analyze it. Moreover we show that the result is essentially best possible, both in terms of the number of deleted edges and the size of the identifying code.

We call a subset $C$ of vertices of a graph $G$ a $(1,\leq \ell)$-identifying code if for all subsets $X$ of vertices with size at most $\ell$, the sets $\{c\in C |\exists u \in X, d(u,c)\leq 1\}$ are distinct. The concept of identifying codes was introduced in 1998 by Karpovsky, Chakrabarty and Levitin. Identifying codes have been studied in various grids. In particular, it has been shown that there exists a $(1,\leq 2)$-identifying code in the king grid with density 3/7 and that there are no such identifying codes with density smaller than 5/12. Using a suitable frame and a discharging procedure, we improve the lower bound by showing that any $(1,\leq 2)$-identifying code of the king grid has density at least 47/111.

A proper vertex-colouring of a graph G is said to be locally identifying if for any pair u,v of adjacent vertices with distinct closed neighbourhoods, the sets of colours in the closed neighbourhoods of u and v are different. We show that any graph G has a locally identifying colouring with $2Δ^2-3Δ+3$ colours, where $Δ$ is the maximum degree of G, answering in a positive way a question asked by Esperet et al. We also provide similar results for locally identifying colourings which have the property that the colours in the neighbourhood of each vertex are all different and apply our method to the class of chordal graphs.

An identifying code of a graph is a subset of its vertices such that every vertex of the graph is uniquely identified by the set of its neighbours within the code. We study the edge-identifying code problem, i.e. the identifying code problem in line graphs. If $\ID(G)$ denotes the size of a minimum identifying code of an identifiable graph $G$, we show that the usual bound $\ID(G)\ge \lceil\log_2(n+1)\rceil$, where $n$ denotes the order of $G$, can be improved to $Θ(\sqrt{n})$ in the class of line graphs. Moreover, this bound is tight. We also prove that the upper bound $\ID(\mathcal{L}(G))\leq 2|V(G)|-5$, where $\mathcal{L}(G)$ is the line graph of $G$, holds (with two exceptions). This implies that a conjecture of R. Klasing, A. Kosowski, A. Raspaud and the first author holds for a subclass of line graphs. Finally, we show that the edge-identifying code problem is NP-complete, even for the class of planar bipartite graphs of maximum degree~3 and arbitrarily large girth.

An identifying code is a subset of vertices of a graph such that each vertex is uniquely determined by its neighbourhood within the identifying code. If $\M(G)$ denotes the minimum size of an identifying code of a graph $G$, it was conjectured by F. Foucaud, R. Klasing, A. Kosowski and A. Raspaud that there exists a constant $c$ such that if a connected graph $G$ with $n$ vertices and maximum degree $d$ admits an identifying code, then $\M(G)\leq n-\tfrac{n}{d}+c$. We use probabilistic tools to show that for any $d\geq 3$, $\M(G)\leq n-\tfrac{n}{Θ(d)}$ holds for a large class of graphs containing, among others, all regular graphs and all graphs of bounded clique number. This settles the conjecture (up to constants) for these classes of graphs. In the general case, we prove $\M(G)\leq n-\tfrac{n}{Θ(d^{3})}$. In a second part, we prove that in any graph $G$ of minimum degree $δ$ and girth at least 5, $\M(G)\leq(1+o_δ(1))\tfrac{3\logδ}{2δ}n$. Using the former result, we give sharp estimates for the size of the minimum identifying code of random $d$-regular graphs, which is about $\tfrac{\log d}{d}n$.

In an undirected graph $G$, a subset $C\subseteq V(G)$ such that $C$ is a dominating set of $G$, and each vertex in $V(G)$ is dominated by a distinct subset of vertices from $C$, is called an identifying code of $G$. The concept of identifying codes was introduced by Karpovsky, Chakrabarty and Levitin in 1998. For a given identifiable graph $G$, let $\M(G)$ be the minimum cardinality of an identifying code in $G$. In this paper, we show that for any connected identifiable triangle-free graph $G$ on $n$ vertices having maximum degree $Δ\geq 3$, $\M(G)\le n-\tfrac{n}{Δ+o(Δ)}$. This bound is asymptotically tight up to constants due to various classes of graphs including $(Δ-1)$-ary trees, which are known to have their minimum identifying code of size $n-\tfrac{n}{Δ-1+o(1)}$. We also provide improved bounds for restricted subfamilies of triangle-free graphs, and conjecture that there exists some constant $c$ such that the bound $\M(G)\le n-\tfrac{n}Δ+c$ holds for any nontrivial connected identifiable graph $G$.