arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $G$ and $H$ be acyclic, upward bipolarly oriented plane graphs with the same number $n$ of edges. While $G$ can symbolize a flow network, $H$ has only a controlling role. Let $φ$ and $ψ$ be bijections from $\{1, \dots, n\}$ to the edge set of $G$ and that of $H$, respectively; their role is to define, for each edge of $H$, the corresponding edge of $G$. Let $b$ be an element of an Abelian group $\mathbb A$. An $n$-tuple $(a_1$, $\dots$, $a_n)$ of elements of $\mathbb A$ is a solution of the paired-bipolar-graphs problem $P:=(G,H$, $φ,ψ$, $\mathbb A, b)$ if whenever $a_i$ is the ``all-or-nothing-flow'' capacity of the edge $φ(i)$ for $i=1, \dots, n$ and $\vec e$ is a maximal directed path of $H$, then by fully exploiting the capacities of the edges corresponding to the edges of $\vec e$ and neglecting the rest of the edges of $G$, we have a flow process transporting $b$ from the source (vertex) of $G$ to the sink of $G$. Let $P':=(H',G'$, $ψ',φ'$, $\mathbb A, b)$, where $H'$ and $G'$ are the ``two-outer-facet'' duals of $H$ and $G$, respectively, and $ψ'$ and $φ'$ are defined naturally. We prove that $P$ and $P'$ have the same solutions. This result implies George Hutchinson's self-duality theorem on submodule lattices.

For a finite lattice $L$, let Gm($L$) denote the least $n$ such that $L$ can be generated by $n$ elements. For integers $r>2$ and $k>1$, denote by FD$(r)^k$ the $k$-th direct power of the free distributive lattice FD($r$) on $r$ generators. We determine Gm(FD$(r)^k$) for many pairs $(r,k)$ either exactly or with good accuracy by giving a lower estimate that becomes an upper estimate if we increase it by 1. For example, for $(r,k)=(5,25\,000)$ and $(r,k)=(20,\ 1.489\cdot 10^{1789})$, Gm(FD$(r)^k$) is $300$ and $6000$, respectively. To reach our goal, we give estimates for the maximum number of pairwise unrelated copies of some specific posets (called full segment posets) in the subset lattice of an $n$-element set. In addition to analogous earlier results in lattice theory, a connection with cryptology is also mentioned among the motivations.

For a finite poset (partially ordered set) $U$ and a natural number $n$, let Sp$(U,n)$ denote the largest number of pairwise unrelated copies of $U$ in the powerset lattice (AKA subset lattice) of an $n$-element set. If $U$ is the singleton poset, then Sp$(U,n)$ was determined by E. Sperner in 1928; this result is well known in extremal combinatorics. Later, exactly or asymptotically, Sperner's theorem was extended to other posets by A. P. Dove, J. R. Griggs, G. O. H. Katona, D Nagy, J. Stahl, and W. T. Jr. Trotter. We determine Sp$(U,n)$ for all finite posets with 0 and 1, and we give reasonable estimates for the ``V-shaped'' 3-element poset and the 4-element poset with 0 and three maximal elements. For a lattice $L$, let Gmin($L$) denote the minimum size of generating sets of $L$. We prove that if $U$ is the poset of the join-irreducible elements of a finite distributive lattice $D$, then the function $k\mapsto$ Gmin($D^k)$ is the left adjoint of the function $n\mapsto$ Sp$(U,n)$. This allows us to determine Gmin($D^k)$ in many cases. E.g., for a 5-element distributive lattice $D$, Gmin($D^{2023})=18$ if $D$ is a chain and Gmin($D^{2023})=15$ otherwise. It follows that large direct powers of small distributive lattices are appropriate for our 2021 cryptographic authentication protocol.

In 1978, motivated by E. Hückel's work in quantum chemistry, I. Gutman introduced the concept of the energy of a finite simple graph $G$ as the sum of the absolute values of the eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix of $G$. At the time of writing, the MathSciNet search for "Title=(graph energy) AND Review Text=(eigenvalue)" returns 351 publications, most of which going after Gutman's definition. A congruence $α$ of a finite algebra $A$ turns $A$ into a simple graph: we connect $x\neq y\in A$ by an edge iff $(x,y)\inα$; we let En$(α)$ be the energy of this graph. We introduce the congruence energy CE$(A)$ of $A$ by CE$(A):=\sum\{$En$(α): α\in$ Con$(A)\}$. Let LAT$(n)$ and CDA$(n)$ stand for the class of $n$-element lattices and that of $n$-element congruence distributive algebras of any type. For a class $\mathcal X$, let CE$(\mathcal X):= \{$CE$(A): A\in \mathcal X\}$. We prove the following. (1) For $α\in A$, En$(α)/2$ is the height of $α$ in the equivalence lattice of $A$. (2) The largest number and the second largest number in CE(LAT($n$)) are $(n-1)\cdot 2^{n-1}$ and, for $n\geq 4$, $(n-1)\cdot 2^{n-2}+2^{n-3}$; these numbers are only witnessed by chains and lattices with exactly one two-element antichain, respectively. (3) The largest number in CE(CDA($n$)) is also $(n-1)\cdot 2^{n-1}$, and if CE$(A)=(n-1)\cdot 2^{n-1}$ for an $A\in$ CDA$(n)$, then Con$(A)$ is a boolean lattice with size $|$Con$(A)|=2^{n-1}$.

In 1980, U. Faigle introduced a sort of finite geometries on posets that are in bijective correspondence with finite semimodular lattices. His result has almost been forgotten in lattice theory. Here we simplify the axiomatization of these geometries, which we call Faigle geometries. To exemplify their usefulness, we give a short proof of a theorem of Grätzer and E. Knapp (2009) asserting that each slim semimodular lattice $L$ has a congruence-preserving extension to a slim rectangular lattice of the same length as $L$. As another application of Faigle geometries, we give a short proof of G. Grätzer and E. W. Kiss' result from 1986 (also proved by M. Wild in 1993 and the present author and E. T. Schmidt in 2010) that each finite semimodular lattice $L$ has an extension to a geometric lattice of the same length as $L$.

A lattice is $(1+1+2)$-generated if it has a four-element generating set such that exactly two of the four generators are comparable. We prove that the lattice Quo$(n)$ of all quasiorders (also known as preorders) of an $n$-element set is $(1+1+2)$-generated for $n=3$ (trivially), $n=6$ (when Quo(6) consists of $209\,527$ elements), n=11, and for every natural number $n\geq 13$. In 2017, the second author and J. Kulin proved that Quo$(n)$ is $(1+1+2)$-generated if either $n$ is odd and at least $13$ or $n$ is even and at least $56$. Compared to the 2017 result, this paper presents twenty-four new numbers $n$ such that Quo$(n)$ is $(1+1+2)$-generated. Except for Quo(6), an extension of Zádori's method is used.

Let $n>3$ be a natural number. By a 1975 result of H. Strietz, the lattice Part$(n)$ of all partitions of an $n$-element set has a four-element generating set. In 1983, L. Zádori gave a new proof of this fact with a particularly elegant construction. Based on his construction from 1983, the present paper gives a lower bound on the number $ν(n)$ of four-element generating sets of Part$(n)$. We also present a computer assisted statistical approach to $ν(n)$ for small values of $n$. In his 1983 paper, L. Zádori also proved that for $n\geq 7$, the lattice Part$(n)$ has a four element generating set that is not an antichain. He left the problem whether such a generating set for $n\in\{5,6\}$ exists open. Here we solve this problem in negative for $n=5$ and in affirmative for $n=6$. Finally, the main theorem asserts that the direct product of some powers of partition lattices is four-generated. In particular, by the first part of this theorem, Part$(n_1)\times$ Part$(n_2)$ is four-generated for any two distinct integers $n_1$ and $n_2$ that are at least 5. The second part of the theorem is technical but it has two corollaries that are easy to understand. Namely, the direct product Part$(n)$ $\times$ Part$(n+1)$ $\times\dots\times$ Part$(3n-14)$ is four-generated for each integer $n\geq 9$. Also, for every positive integer $u$, the $u$-th the direct power of the direct product Part$(n)$ $\times$ Part$(n+1)$ $\times\dots\times$ Part$(n+u-1)$ is four-generated for all but finitely many $n$. If we do not insist on too many direct factors, then the exponent can be quite large. For example, our theorem implies that the $10^{127}$-th direct power of Part$(1011)$ $\times$ Part$(1012)$ $\times \dots \times$ Part$(2020)$ is four-generated.

For an integer $n\geq 5$, H. Strietz (1975) and L. Zádori (1986) proved that the lattice Part$(n)$ of all partitions of $\{1,2,\dots,n\}$ is four-generated. Developing L. Zádori's particularly elegant construction further, we prove that even the $k$-th direct power Part$(n)^k$ of Part$(n)$ is four-generated for many but only finitely many exponents $k$. E.g., Part$(n)^k$ is four-generated for every $k\leq 3\cdot 10^{89}$, and it has a four element generating set that is not an antichain for every $k\leq 1.4\cdot 10^{34}$. In connection with these results, we outline a protocol how to use these lattices in authentication and secret key cryptography.

For every natural number $n\geq 5$, we prove that the number of subuniverses of an $n$-element lattice is $2^n$, $13\cdot 2^{n-4}$, $23\cdot 2^{n-5}$, or less than $23\cdot 2^{n-5}$. By a subuniverse, we mean a sublattice or the emptyset. Also, we describe the $n$-element lattices with exactly $2^n$, $13\cdot 2^{n-4}$, or $23\cdot 2^{n-5}$ subuniverses.

Let $L$ be an $n$-element finite lattice. We prove that if $L$ has strictly more than $2^{n-5}$ congruences, then $L$ is planar. This result is sharp, since for each natural number $n\geq 8$, there exists a non-planar lattice with exactly $2^{n-5}$ congruences.

Let $K_0$ be a compact convex subset of the plane $\mathbb R^2$, and assume that whenever $K_1\subseteq \mathbb R^2$ is congruent to $K_0$, then $K_0$ and $K_1$ are not crossing in a natural sense due to L. Fejes-Tóth. A theorem of L. Fejes-Tóth from 1967 states that the assumption above holds for $K_0$ if and only if $K_0$ is a disk. In a paper appeared in 2017, the present author introduced a new concept of crossing, and proved that L. Fejes-Tóth's theorem remains true if the old concept is replaced by the new one. Our purpose is to describe the hierarchy among several variants of the new concepts and the old concept of crossing. In particular, we prove that each variant of the new concept of crossing is more restrictive then the old one. Therefore, L. Fejes-Tóth's theorem from 1967 becomes an immediate consequence of the 2017 characterization of circles but not conversely. Finally, a mini-survey shows that this purely geometric paper has precursor in combinatorics and, mainly, in lattice theory.

For an integer $n\geq 2$, let NCSL$(n)$ denote the set of sizes of congruence lattices of $n$-element semilattices. We find the four largest numbers belonging to NCSL$(n)$, provided that $n$ is large enough to ensure that $|$NCSL$(n)|\geq 4$. Furthermore, we describe the $n$-element semilattices witnessing these numbers.

After surveying some known properties of compact convex sets in the plane, we give a two rigorous proofs of the general feeling that supporting lines can be slide-turned slowly and continuously. Targeting a wide readership, our treatment is elementary on purpose.

Let $K_0$ be a compact convex subset of the plane $\mathbb R^2$, and assume that $K_1\subseteq \mathbb R^2$ is similar to $K_0$, that is, $K_1$ is the image of $K_0$ with respect to a similarity transformation $\mathbb R^2\to\mathbb R^2$. Kira Adaricheva and Madina Bolat have recently proved that if $K_0$ is a disk and both $K_0$ and $K_1$ are included in a triangle with vertices $A_0$, $A_1$, and $A_2$, then there exist a $j\in \{0,1,2\}$ and a $k\in\{0,1\}$ such that $K_{1-k}$ is included in the convex hull of $K_k\cup(\{A_0,A_1, A_2\}\setminus\{A_j\})$. Here we prove that this property characterizes disks among compact convex subsets of the plane. Actually, we prove even more since we replace "similar" by "isometric" (also called "congruent"). Circles are the boundaries of disks, so our result also gives a characterization of circles.

Kira Adaricheva and Madina Bolat have recently proved that if $U_0$ and $U_1$ are circles in a triangle with vertices $A_0,A_1,A_2$, then there exist $j\in \{0,1,2\}$ and $k\in\{0,1\}$ such that $U_{1-k}$ is included in the convex hull of $U_k\cup(\{A_0,A_1, A_2\}\setminus\{A_j\})$. We give a short new proof for this result, and we point out that a straightforward generalizaton for shperes fails.

By H. Strietz, 1975, and G. Czédli, 1996, the complete lattice $Equ(A)$ of all equivalences is four-generated, provided the size $|A|$ is an accessible cardinal. Results of I. Chajda and G. Czédli, 1996, G. Takách, 1996, T. Dolgos, 2015, and J.\ Kulin 2016, show that both the lattice $Quo(A)$ of all quasiorders on $A$ and, for $|A|\leq \aleph_0$, the lattice $Tran(A)$ of all transitive relations on $A$ have small generating sets. Based on complicated earlier constructions, we derive some new results in a concise but not self-contained way.

Finite convex geometries are combinatorial structures. It follows from a recent result of M.\ Richter and L.G.\ Rogers that there is an infinite set $T_{rr}$ of planar convex polygons such that $T_{rr}$ with respect to geometric convex hulls is a locally convex geometry and every finite convex geometry can be represented by restricting the structure of $T_{rr}$ to a finite subset in a natural way. An \emph{almost-circle of accuracy} $1-ε$ is a differentiable convex simple closed curve $S$ in the plane having an inscribed circle of radius $r_1>0$ and a circumscribed circle of radius $r_2$ such that the ratio $r_1/r_2$ is at least $1-ε$. % Motivated by Richter and Rogers' result, we construct a set $T_{new}$ such that (1) $T_{new}$ contains all points of the plane as degenerate singleton circles and all of its non-singleton members are differentiable convex simple closed planar curves; (2) $T_{new}$ with respect to the geometric convex hull operator is a locally convex geometry; (3) as opposed to $T_{rr}$, $T_{new}$ is closed with respect to non-degenerate affine transformations; and (4) for every (small) positive $ε\in\real $ and for every finite convex geometry, there are continuum many pairwise affine-disjoint finite subsets $E$ of $T_{new}$ such that each $E$ consists of almost-circles of accuracy $1-ε$ and the convex geometry in question is represented by restricting the convex hull operator to $E$. The affine-disjointness of $E_1$ and $E_2$ means that, in addition to $E_1\cap E_2=\emptyset$, even $ψ(E_1)$ is disjoint from $E_2$ for every non-degenerate affine transformation $ψ$.

The swing lemma, due to G. Grätzer for slim semimodular lattices and extended by G. Czédli and G. Grätzer for all planar semimodular lattices, describes the congruence generated by a prime interval in an efficient way. Here we present a new proof for this lemma, which is shorter than the earlier two. Also, motivated by the swing lemma and mechanical pinball games with flippers, we construct an online game called Swing lattice game. A computer program realizing this game is available from the authors' websites.