arXiv++ Combinatorics

We investigate `almost counterexamples' to Seymour's second neighbourhood conjecture. In what we call Seymour-tight orientations, the size of the first neighbourhood of each vertex equals the size of its second neighbourhood. We give several examples and constructions. Specifically, we prove that the class of Seymour-tight orientations is closed under taking (generalized) lexicographic products. Moreover, the lexicographic product of a putative counterexample to Seymour's second neighbourhood conjecture and a Seymour-tight orientation is again a counterexample. Using lexicographic products, we show that if the conjecture is false, then there exist counterexamples that are close to regular tournaments, and moreover that any digraph occurs as an induced subgraph of a counterexample. We then use this same machinery to construct special putative counterexamples to Sullivan's conjecture. The inherent symmetry of these orientations give access to an algebraic perspective. Seymour-tight orientations that are also Cayley digraphs correspond to special pairs of critical sets in groups, which connects potentially to additive combinatorics. We use Kemperman's theorem to characterize those Seymour-tight orientations that are the Cayley digraph of an abelian group.

Given a graph $G$, let $Δ_2(G)$ denote the maximum number of neighbors any two distinct vertices of $G$ have in common. Vu (2002) proposed that, provided $Δ_2(G)$ is not too small as a proportion of the maximum degree $Δ(G)$ of $G$, the chromatic number of $G$ should never be too much larger than $Δ_2(G)$. We make a first approach towards Vu's conjecture from a structural graph theoretic point of view. We prove that, in the case where $G$ is claw-free, indeed the chromatic number of $G$ is at most $Δ_2(G)+3$. This is tight, as our bound is met with equality for the line graph of the Petersen graph. Moreover, we can prove this in terms of the more specific parameter that bounds the maximum number of neighbors any two endpoints of some edge of $G$ have in common. Our result may be viewed as a generalization of the classic bound of Vizing (1964) for edge-coloring.

In this paper, we explore algebraic approaches to $d$-improper and $t$-clustered colourings, where the colouring constraints are relaxed to allow some monochromatic edges. Bilu [J. Comb. Theory Ser. B, 96(4):608-613, 2006] proved a generalization of the Hoffman bound for $d$-improper colourings. We strengthen this theorem by characterizing the equality case. In particular, if the Hoffman bound is tight for a graph $G$, then the $d$-improper Hoffman bound is tight for the strong product $G \boxtimes K_{d+1}$. Moreover, we prove d-improper analogous for the inertia bound by Cvetkovíc and the multi-eigenvalue lower bounds of Elphick and Wocjan. We conjecture an equality between the chromatic number of a graph $G$ and the $d$-improper chromatic number of its strong product with a complete graph, $G \boxtimes K_{d+1}$, and prove the conjecture in special graph classes, including perfect graphs and graphs with chromatic number at most 4. Other supporting evidence for the conjecture includes a fractional analogue, a clustered analogue, and various spectral relaxations of the equality.

For a given graph, the unlabeled subgraphs $G-v$ are called the cards of $G$ and the deck of $G$ is the multiset $\{G-v: v \in V(G)\}$. Wendy Myrvold [Ars Combinatoria, 1989] showed that a non-connected graph and a connected graph both on $n$ vertices have at most $\lfloor \frac{n}{2} \rfloor +1$ cards in common and she found (infinite) families of trees and non-connected forests for which this upper bound is tight. Bowler, Brown, and Fenner [Journal of Graph Theory, 2010] conjectured that this bound is tight for $n \geq 44$. In this article, we prove this conjecture for sufficiently large $n$. The main result is that a tree $T$ and a unicyclic graph $G$ on $n$ vertices have at most $\lfloor \frac{n}{2} \rfloor+1$ common cards. Combined with Myrvold's work this shows that it can be determined whether a graph on $n$ vertices is a tree from any $\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\rfloor+2$ of its cards. Based on this theorem, it follows that any forest and non-forest also have at most $\lfloor \frac{n}{2} \rfloor +1$ common cards. Moreover, we have classified all except finitely many pairs for which this bound is strict. Furthermore, the main ideas of the proof for trees are used to show that the girth of a graph on $n$ vertices can be determined based on any $\frac{2n}{3} +1$ of its cards. Lastly, we show that any $\frac{5n}{6} +2$ cards determine whether a graph is bipartite.