Papers by Gennadiy Averkov
32 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Maximum Semidefinite and Linear Extension Complexity of Families of Polytopes
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
We relate the maximum semidefinite and linear extension complexity of a family of polytopes to the cardinality of this family and the minimum pairwise Hausdorff distance of its members. This result directly implies a known lower bound on the maximum semidefinite extension complexity of 0/1-polytopes. We further show how our result can be used to improve on the corresponding bounds known for polygons with integer vertices.
Our geometric proof builds upon nothing else than a simple well-known property of maximum volume inscribed ellipsoids of convex bodies. In particular, it does not rely on factorizations over the semidefinite cone and thus avoids involved procedures of balancing them as required, e.g., in [Briet, Dadush & Pokutta 2015]. We hope that revealing the geometry behind the phenomenon opens doors for further results.
Moreover, we show that the linear extension complexity of every d-dimensional 0/1-polytope is bounded from above by O(2^d / d).
Tight bounds on discrete quantitative Helly numbers
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Given a subset S of R^n, let c(S,k) be the smallest number t such that whenever finitely many convex sets have exactly k common points in S, there exist at most t of these sets that already have exactly k common points in S. For S = Z^n, this number was introduced by Aliev et al. [2014] who gave an explicit bound showing that c(Z^n,k) = O(k) holds for every fixed n. Recently, Chestnut et al. [2015] improved this to c(Z^n,k) = O(k (log log k)(log k)^{-1/3} ) and provided the lower bound c(Z^n,k) = Omega(k^{(n-1)/(n+1)}).
We provide a combinatorial description of c(S,k) in terms of polytopes with vertices in S and use it to improve the previously known bounds as follows: We strengthen the bound of Aliev et al. [2014] by a constant factor and extend it to general discrete sets S. We close the gap for Z^n by showing that c(Z^n,k) = Theta(k^{(n-1)/(n+1)}) holds for every fixed n. Finally, we determine the exact values of c(Z^n,k) for all k <= 4.
Notions of maximality for integral lattice-free polyhedra: the case of dimension three
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Lattice-free sets (convex subsets of $\mathbb{R}^d$ without interior integer points) and their applications for cutting-plane methods in mixed-integer optimization have been studied in recent literature. Notably, the family of all integral lattice-free polyhedra which are not properly contained in another integral lattice-free polyhedron has been of particular interest. We call these polyhedra $\mathbb{Z}^d$-maximal.
It is known that, for fixed $d$, the family $\mathbb{Z}^d$-maximal integral lattice-free polyhedra is finite up to unimodular equivalence. In view of possible applications in cutting-plane theory, one would like to have a classification of this family. However, this turns out to be a challenging task already for small dimensions.
In contrast, the subfamily of all integral lattice-free polyhedra which are not properly contained in any other lattice-free set, which we call $\mathbb{R}^d$-maximal lattice-free polyhedra, allow a rather simple geometric characterization. Hence, the question was raised for which dimensions the notions of $\mathbb{Z}^d$-maximality and $\mathbb{R}^d$-maximality are equivalent. This was known to be the case for dimensions one and two. On the other hand, Nill and Ziegler (2011) showed that for dimension $d \ge 4$, there exist polyhedra which are $\mathbb{Z}^d$-maximal but not $\mathbb{R}^d$-maximal. In this article, we consider the remaining case $d = 3$ and prove that for integral polyhedra the notions of $\mathbb{R}^3$-maximality and $\mathbb{Z}^3$-maximality are equivalent. As a consequence, the classification of all $\mathbb{R}^3$-maximal integral polyhedra by Averkov, Wagner and Weismantel (2011) contains all $\mathbb{Z}^3$-maximal integral polyhedra.
Homometry and direct-sum decompositions of lattice-convex sets
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Two sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$ are called homometric if they have the same covariogram, where the covariogram of a finite subset $K$ of $\mathbb{R}^d$ is the function associating to each $u \in \mathbb{R}^d$ the cardinality of $K \cap (K+u)$. Understanding the structure of homometric sets is important for a number of areas of mathematics and applications.
If two sets are homometric but do not coincide up to translations and point reflections, we call them nontrivially homometric. We study nontrivially homometric pairs of lattice-convex sets, where a set $K$ is called lattice-convex with respect to a lattice $\mathbb{M} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$ if $K$ is the intersection of $\mathbb{M}$ and a convex subset of $\mathbb{R}^d$. This line of research was initiated in 2005 by Daurat, Gérard and Nivat and, independently, by Gardner, Gronchi and Zong.
All pairs of nontrivially homometric lattice-convex sets that have been known so far can essentially be written as direct sums $S \oplus T$ and $S \oplus (-T)$, where $T$ is lattice-convex, the underlying lattice~$\mathbb{M}$ is the direct sum of $T$ and some sublattice $\mathbb{L}$, and $S$ is a subset of $\mathbb{L}$. We study pairs of nontrivially homometric lattice-convex sets assuming this particular form and establish a necessary and a sufficient condition for the lattice-convexity of $S \oplus T$. This allows us to explicitly describe all nontrivially homometric pairs in dimension two, under the above assumption, and to construct examples of nontrivially homometric pairs of lattice-convex sets for each $d \ge 3$.
Lifting properties of maximal lattice-free polyhedra
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
We study the uniqueness of minimal liftings of cut-generating functions obtained from maximal lattice-free polyhedra. We prove a basic invariance property of unique minimal liftings for general maximal lattice-free polyhedra. This generalizes a previous result by Basu, Cornuéjols and Köppe~\cite{bcm} for {\em simplicial} maximal lattice-free polytopes, thus completely settling this fundamental question about lifting for maximal lattice-free polyhedra. We further give a very general iterative construction to get maximal lattice-free polyhedra with the unique-lifting property in arbitrary dimensions. This single construction not only obtains all previously known polyhedra with the unique-lifting property, but goes further and vastly expands the known list of such polyhedra. Finally, we extend characterizations from~\cite{bcm} about lifting with respect to maximal lattice-free simplices to more general polytopes. These nontrivial generalizations rely on a number of results from discrete geometry, including the Venkov-Alexandrov-McMullen theorem on translative tilings and characterizations of zonotopes in terms of central symmetry of their faces.
Largest integral simplices with one interior integral point: Solution of Hensley's conjecture and related results
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
For each dimension $d$, $d$-dimensional integral simplices with exactly one interior integral point have bounded volume. This was first shown by Hensley. Explicit volume bounds were determined by Hensley, Lagarias and Ziegler, Pikhurko, and Averkov. In this paper we determine the exact upper volume bound for such simplices and characterize the volume-maximizing simplices. We also determine the sharp upper bound on the coefficient of asymmetry of an integral polytope with a single interior integral point. This result confirms a conjecture of Hensley from 1983. Moreover, for an integral simplex with precisely one interior integral point, we give bounds on the volumes of its faces, the barycentric coordinates of the interior integral point and its number of integral points. Furthermore, we prove a bound on the lattice diameter of integral polytopes with a fixed number of interior integral points. The presented results have applications in toric geometry and in integer optimization.
On the convergence of the affine hull of the Chvátal-Gomory closures
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Given an integral polyhedron P and a rational polyhedron Q living in the same n-dimensional space and containing the same integer points as P, we investigate how many iterations of the Chvátal-Gomory closure operator have to be performed on Q to obtain a polyhedron contained in the affine hull of P. We show that if P contains an integer point in its relative interior, then such a number of iterations can be bounded by a function depending only on n. On the other hand, we prove that if P is not full-dimensional and does not contain any integer point in its relative interior, then no finite bound on the number of iterations exists.
On finitely generated closures in the theory of cutting planes
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Let $P$ be a rational polyhedron in $\mathbb{R}^d$ and let $\mathcal{L}$ be a class of $d$-dimensional maximal lattice-free rational polyhedra in $\mathbb{R}^d$. For $L \in \mathcal{L}$ by $R_L(P)$ we denote the convex hull of points belonging to $P$ but not to the interior of $L$. Andersen, Louveaux and Weismantel showed that if the so-called max-facet-width of all $L \in \mathcal{L}$ is bounded from above by a constant independent of $L$, then $\bigcap_{L\in \mathcal{L}} R_L(P)$ is a rational polyhedron. We give a short proof of a generalization of this result. We also give a characterization for the boundedness of the max-facet-width on $\mathcal{L}$. The presented results are motivated by applications in cutting-plane theory from mixed-integer optimization.
A proof of Lovász's theorem on maximal lattice-free sets
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Let $K$ be a maximal lattice-free set in $\mathbb{R}^d$, that is, $K$ is convex and closed subset of $\mathbb{R}^d$, the interior of $K$ does not cointain points of $\mathbb{Z}^d$ and $K$ is inclusion-maximal with respect to the above properties. A result of Lovász assert that if $K$ is $d$-dimensional, then $K$ is a polyhedron with at most $2^d$ facets, and the recession cone of $K$ is spanned by vectors from $\mathbb{Z}^d$. A first complete proof of mentioned Lovász's result has been published in a paper of Basu, Conforti, Cornuéjols and Zambelli (where the authors use Dirichlet's approximation as a tool). The aim of this note is to give another proof of this result. Our proof relies on Minkowki's first fundamental theorem from the gemetry of numbers. We remark that the result of Lovász is relevant in integer and mixed-integer optimization.
On maximal S-free sets and the Helly number for the family of S-convex sets
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
We study two combinatorial parameters, which we denote by f(S) and h(S), associated to an arbitrary set S \subseteq R^d, where d \in N. In the nondegenerate situation, f(S) is the largest possible number of facets of a d-dimensional polyhedron L such that the interior of L is disjoint with S and L is inclusion-maximal with respect to this property. The parameter h(S) is the Helly number of the family of all sets that can be given as the intersection of S with a convex subset of R^d. We obtain the inequality f(S) \le h(S) for an arbitrary S and the equality f(S)=h(S) for every discrete S. Furthermore, motivated by research in integer and mixed-integer optimization, we show that 2^d is the sharp upper bound on f(S) in the case S = (Z^d \times R^n) \cap C, where n \ge 0 and C \subseteq R^{d+n} is convex. The presented material generalizes and unifies results of various authors, including the result h(Z^d) = 2^d of Doignon, the related result f(Z^d)=2^d of Lovász and the inequality f(Z^d \cap C) \le 2^d, which has recently been proved for every convex set C \subseteq R^d by Dey & Morán.
On the size of lattice simplices with a single interior lattice point
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Let $\mathcal{T}^d(1)$ be the set of all $d$-dimensional simplices $T$ in $\real^d$ with integer vertices and a single integer point in the interior of $T$. It follows from a result of Hensley that $\mathcal{T}^d(1)$ is finite up to affine transformations that preserve $\mathbb{Z}^d$. It is known that, when $d$ grows, the maximum volume of the simplices $T \in \cT^d(1)$ becomes extremely large. We improve and refine bounds on the size of $T \in \mathcal{T}^d(1)$ (where by the size we mean the volume or the number of lattice points). It is shown that each $T \in \mathcal{T}^d(1)$ can be decomposed into an ascending chain of faces whose sizes are `not too large'. More precisely, if $T \in \mathcal{T}^d(1)$, then there exist faces $G_1 \subseteq ... \subseteq G_d=T$ of $T$ such that, for every $i \in \{1,...,d\}$, $G_i$ is $i$-dimensional and the size of $G_i$ is bounded from above in terms of $i$ and $d$. The bound on the size of $G_i$ is double exponential in $i$. The presented upper bounds are asymptotically tight on the log-log scale.
Maximal lattice-free polyhedra: finiteness and an explicit description in dimension three
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
A convex set with nonempty interior is maximal lattice-free if it is inclusion-maximal with respect to the property of not containing integer points in its interior. Maximal lattice-free convex sets are known to be polyhedra. The precision of a rational polyhedron $P$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$ is the smallest integer $s$ such that $sP$ is an integral polyhedron. In this paper we show that, up to affine mappings preserving $\mathbb{Z}^d$, the number of maximal lattice-free rational polyhedra of a given precision $s$ is finite. Furthermore, we present the complete list of all maximal lattice-free integral polyhedra in dimension three. Our results are motivated by recent research on cutting plane theory in mixed-integer linear optimization.