Papers by Hans-Jürgen Bandelt
4 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Absolute retracts of reflexive oriented graphs: the role of the MacNeille completion
We characterize the absolute retracts in the category of reflexive oriented graphs, that is, antisymmetric reflexive graphs, where morphisms between objects preserve arcs (which may be sent to loops). Here we show, by correcting a much earlier attempt at a proof, that a reflexive oriented graph is an absolute retract if and only if it is indeed a retract of some (direct) product of reflexive oriented zigzags (which are concatenations of reflexive oriented paths). Absolute retracts are therefore necessarily acyclic. In contrast to other categories of graphs and ordered sets, not every acyclic oriented graph can be embedded isometrically into some absolute retract. Embedding involves isometry with respect to the zig-zag distances forming a particular "dual quantale", which is a complete lattice of certain sets of words over the alphabet $\{+, -\}$, endowed with an additional monoid operation (viz., compound concatenation of sets of words) and an involution (interchanging $+$ and $- $ and then mirroring words). As reflexive oriented zigzags have MacNeille-closed distances, so do their products and retracts. So, the category of reflexive oriented graphs and its full subcategory of reflexive acyclic graphs do not have enough injectives, as the injective objects coincide with the absolute retracts.
A syntactic approach to the MacNeille completion of $\boldΛ^{\ast}$, the free monoid over an ordered alphabet $\bold Λ$
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Let $Λ^{\ast}$ be the free monoid of (finite) words over a not necessarily finite alphabet $Λ$, which is equipped with some (partial) order. This ordering lifts to $Λ^{\ast}$, where it extends the divisibility ordering of words. The MacNeille completion of $Λ^{\ast}$ constitutes a complete lattice ordered monoid and is realized by the system of "closed" lower sets in $Λ^*$ (ordered by inclusion) or its isomorphic copy formed of the "closed" upper sets (ordered by reverse inclusion). Under some additional hypothesis on $Λ$, one can easily identify the closed lower sets as the finitely generated ones, whereas it is more complicated to determine the closed upper sets. For a fairly large class of ordered sets $Λ$ (including complete lattices as well as antichains) one can generate the closure of any upper set of words by means of binary operations ( "syntactic rules") thus obtaining an efficient procedure to test closedness. Closed upper set of words are involved in an embedding theorem for valuated oriented graphs. In fact, generalized paths (so-called "zigzags") are encoded by words over an alphabet $Λ$. Then the valuated oriented graphs which are "isometrically" embeddable in a product of zigzags have the characteristic property that the words corresponding to the zigzags between any pair of vertices form a closed upper set in $Λ$.
Ramified rectilinear polygons: coordinatization by dendrons
Published in Discrete Comput. Geom. 54 (4): 771-797, 2015
• View Publication
• BIB
Simple rectilinear polygons (i.e. rectilinear polygons without holes or cutpoints) can be regarded as finite rectangular cell complexes coordinatized by two finite dendrons. The intrinsic $l_1$-metric is thus inherited from the product of the two finite dendrons via an isometric embedding. The rectangular cell complexes that share this same embedding property are called ramified rectilinear polygons. The links of vertices in these cell complexes may be arbitrary bipartite graphs, in contrast to simple rectilinear polygons where the links of points are either 4-cycles or paths of length at most 3. Ramified rectilinear polygons are particular instances of rectangular complexes obtained from cube-free median graphs, or equivalently simply connected rectangular complexes with triangle-free links. The underlying graphs of finite ramified rectilinear polygons can be recognized among graphs in linear time by a Lexicographic Breadth-First-Search. Whereas the symmetry of a simple rectilinear polygon is very restricted (with automorphism group being a subgroup of the dihedral group $D_4$), ramified rectilinear polygons are universal: every finite group is the automorphism group of some ramified rectilinear polygon.
Combinatorics and geometry of finite and infinite squaregraphs
Published in SIAM J. Discrete Math. 24(4): 1399-1440, 2010
• View Publication
• BIB
Squaregraphs were originally defined as finite plane graphs in which all inner faces are quadrilaterals (i.e., 4-cycles) and all inner vertices (i.e., the vertices not incident with the outer face) have degrees larger than three. The planar dual of a finite squaregraph is determined by a triangle-free chord diagram of the unit disk, which could alternatively be viewed as a triangle-free line arrangement in the hyperbolic plane. This representation carries over to infinite plane graphs with finite vertex degrees in which the balls are finite squaregraphs. Algebraically, finite squaregraphs are median graphs for which the duals are finite circular split systems. Hence squaregraphs are at the crosspoint of two dualities, an algebraic and a geometric one, and thus lend themselves to several combinatorial interpretations and structural characterizations. With these and the 5-colorability theorem for circle graphs at hand, we prove that every squaregraph can be isometrically embedded into the Cartesian product of five trees. This embedding result can also be extended to the infinite case without reference to an embedding in the plane and without any cardinality restriction when formulated for median graphs free of cubes and further finite obstructions. Further, we exhibit a class of squaregraphs that can be embedded into the product of three trees and we characterize those squaregraphs that are embeddable into the product of just two trees. Finally, finite squaregraphs enjoy a number of algorithmic features that do not extend to arbitrary median graphs. For instance, we show that median-generating sets of finite squaregraphs can be computed in polynomial time, whereas, not unexpectedly, the corresponding problem for median graphs turns out to be NP-hard.