arXiv++ Combinatorics

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of the chromatic polynomial $P(G,m)$, the DP color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all possible $m$-fold covers. Chromatic polynomials for joins and vertex-gluings of graphs are well understood, but the effect of these graph operations on the DP color function is not known. In this paper we make progress on understanding the DP color function of the join of a graph with a complete graph and vertex-gluings of certain graphs. We also develop tools to study the DP color function under these graph operations, and we study the threshold (smallest $m$) beyond which the DP color function of a graph constructed with these operations equals its chromatic polynomial.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of the chromatic polynomial $P(G,m)$, the DP color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all possible $m$-fold covers. It is known that, unlike the list color function $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, for any $g \geq 3$ there exists a graph $G$ with girth $g$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) < P(G,m)$ when $m$ is sufficiently large. Thus, two fundamental open questions regarding the DP color function are: (i) for which $G$ does there exist an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq N$, (ii) Given a graph $G$ does there always exist an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ and a polynomial $p(m)$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) = p(m)$ whenever $m \geq N$? In this paper we give exact formulas for the DP color function of a Theta graph based on the parity of its path lengths. This gives an explicit answer, including the formulas for the polynomials that are not the chromatic polynomial, to both the questions above for Theta graphs. We extend this result to Generalized Theta graphs by characterizing the exact parity condition that ensures the DP color function eventually equals the chromatic polynomial. To answer the second question for Generalized Theta graphs, we confirm it for the larger class of graphs with a feedback vertex set of size one.

Equitable list arboricity, introduced by Zhang in 2016, generalizes the notion of equitable list coloring by requiring the subgraph induced by each color class to be acyclic (instead of edgeless) in addition to the usual upper bound on the size of each color class. Graph $G$ is equitably $k$-list arborable if an equitable, arborable list coloring of $G$ exists for every list assignment for $G$ that associates with each vertex in $G$ a list of $k$ available colors. Zhang conjectured that any graph $G$ is equitably $k$-list arborable for each $k$ satisfying $k \geq \lceil (1+Δ(G))/2 \rceil$. We verify this conjecture for powers of cycles by applying a new lemma which is a general tool for extending partial equitable, arborable list colorings. We also propose a stronger version of Zhang's Conjecture for certain connected graphs: any connected graph $G$ is equitably $k$-list arborable for each $k$ satisfying $k \geq \lceil Δ(G)/2 \rceil$ provided $G$ is neither a cycle nor a complete graph of odd order. We verify this stronger version of Zhang's Conjecture for powers of paths, 2-degenerate graphs, and certain other graphs. We also show that if $G$ is equitably $k$-list arborable it does not necessarily follow that $G$ is equitably $(k+1)$-list arborable which addresses a question of Drgas-Burchardt, Furmanczyk, and Sidorowicz (2018).

Equitable $k$-choosability is a list analogue of equitable $k$-coloring that was introduced by Kostochka, Pelsmajer, and West in 2003. It is known that if vertex disjoint graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ are equitably $k$-choosable, the disjoint union of $G_1$ and $G_2$ may not be equitably $k$-choosable. Given any $m \in \mathbb{N}$ the values of $k$ for which $K_{1,m}$ is equitably $k$-choosable are known. Also, a complete characterization of equitably $2$-choosable graphs is not known. With these facts in mind, we study the equitable choosability of $\sum_{i=1}^n K_{1,m_i}$, the disjoint union of $n$ stars. We show that determining whether $\sum_{i=1}^n K_{1,m_i}$ is equitably choosable is NP-complete when the same list of two colors is assigned to every vertex. We completely determine when the disjoint union of two stars (or $n \geq 2$ identical stars) is equitably 2-choosable, and we present results on the equitable $k$-choosability of the disjoint union of two stars for arbitrary $k$.

In 1980, Albertson and Berman introduced partial coloring. In 2000, Albertson, Grossman, and Haas introduced partial list coloring. Here, we initiate the study of partial coloring for an insightful generalization of list coloring introduced in 2015 by Dvořák and Postle, DP-coloring (or correspondence coloring). We consider the DP-coloring analogue of the Partial List Coloring Conjecture, which generalizes a natural bound for partial coloring. We show that while this partial DP-coloring conjecture does not hold, several results on partial list coloring can be extended to partial DP-coloring. We also study partial DP-coloring of the join of a graph with a complete graph, and we present several interesting open questions.

We initiate the study of applying the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz to the DP-coloring of graphs even though, as is well-known, the Alon-Tarsi theorem does not apply to DP-coloring. We define the notion of good covers of prime order which allows us to apply the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz to DP-coloring. We apply these tools to DP-coloring of the cones of certain bipartite graphs and uniquely 3-colorable graphs. We also extend a result of Akbari, Mirrokni, and Sadjad (2006) on unique list colorability to the context of DP-coloring. We establish a sufficient algebraic condition for a graph $G$ to satisfy $χ_{DP}(G) \leq 3$, and we completely determine the DP-chromatic number of squares of all cycles.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. In 2019, Bernshteyn, Kostochka, and Zhu introduced a fractional version of DP-coloring. They showed that unlike the fractional list chromatic number, the fractional DP-chromatic number of a graph $G$, denoted $χ_{_{DP}}^*(G)$, can be arbitrarily larger than $χ^*(G)$, the graph's fractional chromatic number. We generalize a result of Alon, Tuza, and Voigt (1997) on the fractional list chromatic number of odd cycles, and, in the process, show that for each $k \in \mathbb{N}$, $χ_{_{DP}}^*(C_{2k+1}) = χ^*(C_{2k+1})$. We also show that for any $n \geq 2$ and $m \in \mathbb{N}$, if $p^*$ is the solution in $(0,1)$ to $p=(1-p)^n$ then $χ_{_{DP}}^*(K_{n,m})\leq1/p^*$, and we prove a generalization of this result for multipartite graphs. Finally, we determine a lower bound on $χ_{_{DP}}^*(K_{2,m})$ for any $m \geq 3$.

The chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, denoted $P(G,m)$, is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$. The list color function of graph $G$, denoted $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, is a list analogue of the chromatic polynomial that has been studied since 1992, primarily through comparisons with the corresponding chromatic polynomial. DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring recently introduced by Dvořák and Postle. In this paper, we introduce a DP-coloring analogue of the chromatic polynomial called the DP color function, denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$, and ask several fundamental open questions about it, making progress on some of them. Motivated by known results related to the list color function, we show that while the DP color function behaves similar to the list color function for some graphs, there are also some surprising differences. For example, Wang, Qian, and Yan recently showed that if $G$ is a connected graph with $l$ edges, then $P_{\ell}(G,m)=P(G,m)$ whenever $m > \frac{l-1}{\ln(1+ \sqrt{2})}$, but we will show that for any $g \geq 3$ there exists a graph, $G$, with girth $g$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) < P(G,m)$ when $m$ is sufficiently large. We also study the asymptotics of $P(G,m) - P_{DP}(G,m)$ for a fixed graph $G$. We develop techniques to compute $P_{DP}(G,m)$ exactly and apply them to certain classes of graphs such as chordal graphs, unicyclic graphs, and cycles with a chord. Finally, we make progress towards showing that for any graph $G$, there is a $p$ such that $P_{DP}(G \vee K_p, m) = P(G \vee K_p , m)$ for large enough $m$.

We study the list chromatic number of the Cartesian product of any graph $G$ and a complete bipartite graph with partite sets of size $a$ and $b$, denoted $χ_\ell(G \square K_{a,b})$. We have two motivations. A classic result on the gap between list chromatic number and the chromatic number tells us $χ_\ell(K_{a,b}) = 1 + a$ if and only if $b \geq a^a$. Since $χ_\ell(K_{a,b}) \leq 1 + a$ for any $b \in \mathbb{N}$, this result tells us the values of $b$ for which $χ_\ell(K_{a,b})$ is as large as possible and far from $χ(K_{a,b})=2$. In this paper we seek to understand when $χ_\ell(G \square K_{a,b})$ is far from $χ(G \square K_{a,b}) = \max \{χ(G), 2 \}$. It is easy to show $χ_\ell(G \square K_{a,b}) \leq χ_\ell (G) + a$. In 2006, Borowiecki, Jendrol, Král, and Miskuf showed that this bound is attainable if $b$ is sufficiently large; specifically, $χ_\ell(G \square K_{a,b}) = χ_\ell (G) + a$ whenever $b \geq (χ_\ell(G) + a - 1)^{a|V(G)|}$. Given any graph $G$ and $a \in \mathbb{N}$, we wish to determine the smallest $b$ such that $χ_\ell(G \square K_{a,b}) = χ_\ell (G) + a$. In this paper we show that the list color function, a list analogue of the chromatic polynomial, provides the right concept and tool for making progress on this problem. Using the list color function, we prove a general improvement on Borowiecki et al.'s 2006 result, and we compute the smallest such $b$ exactly for some large families of chromatic-choosable graphs.

We recently introduced proportional choosability, a new list analogue of equitable coloring. Like equitable coloring, and unlike list equitable coloring (a.k.a. equitable choosability), proportional choosability bounds sizes of color classes both from above and from below. In this note, we show that a graph is proportionally 2-choosable if and only if it is a linear forest such that its largest component has at most 5 vertices and all of its other components have two or fewer vertices. We also construct examples that show that characterizing equitably 2-choosable graphs is still open.

In 2003, Kostochka, Pelsmajer, and West introduced a list analogue of equitable coloring called equitable choosability. In this paper, we motivate and define a new list analogue of equitable coloring called proportional choosability. A $k$-assignment $L$ for a graph $G$ specifies a list $L(v)$ of $k$ available colors for each vertex $v$ of $G$. An $L$-coloring assigns a color to each vertex $v$ from its list $L(v)$. For each color $c$, let $η(c)$ be the number of vertices $v$ whose list $L(v)$ contains $c$. A proportional $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper $L$-coloring in which each color $c \in \bigcup_{v \in V(G)} L(v)$ is used $\lfloor η(c)/k \rfloor$ or $\lceil η(c)/k \rceil$ times. A graph $G$ is proportionally $k$-choosable if a proportional $L$-coloring of $G$ exists whenever $L$ is a $k$-assignment for $G$. We show that if a graph $G$ is proportionally $k$-choosable, then every subgraph of $G$ is also proportionally $k$-choosable and also $G$ is proportionally $(k+1)$-choosable, unlike equitable choosability for which analogous claims would be false. We also show that any graph $G$ is proportionally $k$-choosable whenever $k \geq Δ(G) + \lceil |V(G)|/2 \rceil$, and we use matching theory to completely characterize the proportional choosability of stars and the disjoint union of cliques.

We introduce a notion of color-criticality in the context of chromatic-choosability. We define a graph $G$ to be strong $k$-chromatic-choosable if $χ(G) = k$ and every $(k-1)$-assignment for which $G$ is not list-colorable has the property that the lists are the same for all vertices. That is the usual coloring is, in some sense, the obstacle to list-coloring. We prove basic properties of strongly chromatic-choosable graphs such as chromatic-choosability and vertex-criticality, and we construct infinite families of strongly chromatic-choosable graphs. We derive a sufficient condition for the existence of at least two list colorings of strongly chromatic-choosable graphs and use it to show that: if $M$ is a strong $k$-chromatic-choosable graph with $|E(M)| \leq |V(M)|(k-2)$ and $H$ is a graph that contains a Hamilton path, $w_1, w_2, \ldots, w_m$, such that $w_i$ has at most $ρ\geq 1$ neighbors among $w_1, \ldots, w_{i-1}$, then $χ_{\ell}(M \square H) \le k+ ρ- 1$. We show that this bound is sharp for all $ρ\ge 1$ by generalizing the theorem to apply to $H$ that are $(M,ρ)$-Cartesian accommodating which is a notion we define with the help of the list color function, $ P_{\ell}(G,k)$, the list analogue of the chromatic polynomial. We also use the list color function to determine the list chromatic number of certain star-like graphs: $χ_{\ell}(M \square K_{1,s}) =$ $k \; \text{if } s < P_{\ell}(M,k)$, or $k+1 \; \text{if } s \geq P_{\ell}(M,k)$, where $M$ is a strong $k$-chromatic-choosable graph. We show that $ P_{\ell}(M,k)$ equals $P(M,k)$, the chromatic polynomial, when $M$ is an odd cycle, complete graph, or the join of an odd cycle with a complete graph.

An equitable coloring is a proper coloring of a graph such that the sizes of the color classes differ by at most one. A graph $G$ is equitably $k$-colorable if there exists an equitable coloring of $G$ which uses $k$ colors, each one appearing on either $\lfloor |V(G)|/k \rfloor$ or $\lceil |V(G)|/k \rceil$ vertices of $G$. In 1994, Fu conjectured that for any simple graph $G$, the total graph of $G$, $T(G)$, is equitably $k$-colorable whenever $k \geq \max\{χ(T(G)), Δ(G)+2\}$ where $χ(T(G))$ is the chromatic number of the total graph of $G$ and $Δ(G)$ is the maximum degree of $G$. We investigate the list coloring analogue. List coloring requires each vertex $v$ to be colored from a specified list $L(v)$ of colors. A graph is $k$-choosable if it has a proper list coloring whenever vertices have lists of size $k$. A graph is equitably $k$-choosable if it has a proper list coloring whenever vertices have lists of size $k$, where each color is used on at most $\lceil |V(G)|/k \rceil$ vertices. In the spirit of Fu's conjecture, we conjecture that for any simple graph $G$, $T(G)$ is equitably $k$-choosable whenever $k \geq \max\{χ_l(T(G)), Δ(G)+2\}$ where $χ_l(T(G))$ is the list chromatic number of $T(G)$. We prove this conjecture for all graphs satisfying $Δ(G) \leq 2$ while also studying the related question of the equitable choosability of powers of paths and cycles.

We study the list chromatic number of Cartesian products of graphs through the Alon-Tarsi number as defined by Jensen and Toft (1995) in their seminal book on graph coloring problems. The Alon-Tarsi number of $G$, $AT(G)$, is the smallest $k$ for which there is an orientation, $D$, of $G$ with max indegree $k\!-\!1$ such that the number of even and odd circulations contained in $D$ are different. It is known that $χ(G) \leq χ_\ell(G) \leq χ_p(G) \leq AT(G)$, where $χ(G)$ is the chromatic number, $χ_\ell(G)$ is the list chromatic number, and $χ_p(G)$ is the paint number of $G$. In this paper we find families of graphs $G$ and $H$ such that $χ(G \square H) = AT(G \square H)$, reducing this sequence of inequalities to equality. We show that the Alon-Tarsi number of the Cartesian product of an odd cycle and a path is always equal to 3. This result is then extended to show that if $G$ is an odd cycle or a complete graph and $H$ is a graph on at least two vertices containing the Hamilton path $w_1, w_2, \ldots, w_n$ such that for each $i$, $w_i$ has a most $k$ neighbors among $w_1, w_2, \ldots, w_{i-1}$, then $AT(G \square H) \leq Δ(G)+k$ where $Δ(G)$ is the maximum degree of $G$. We discuss other extensions for $G \square H$, where $G$ is such that $V(G)$ can be partitioned into odd cycles and complete graphs, and $H$ is a graph containing a Hamiltonian path. We apply these bounds to get chromatic-choosable Cartesian products, in fact we show that these families of graphs have $χ(G) = AT(G)$, improving previously known bounds.