arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Herman Servatius

9 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
Liftings of surfaces in the plane
In this note we provide a topological definition of Maxwell-Cremona liftings for non-planar frameworks of surfaces (both oriented and non-oriented). In the non-oriented case we give an estimate on the dimension of self-stresses, when the frameworks will posses a non-trivial lifting.
Counting for rigidity under projective transformations in the plane
Let $P$ be a set of points and $L$ a set of lines in the (extended) Euclidean plane, and $I \subseteq P\times L$, where $i =(p,l) \in I$ means that point $p$ and line $l$ are incident. The incidences can be interpreted as quadratic constraints on the homogeneous coordinates of the points and lines. We study the space of incidence preserving motions of the given incidence structure by linearizing the system of quadratic equations. The Jacobian of the quadratic system, our projective rigidity matrix, leads to the notion of independence/dependence of incidences. Column dependencies correspond to infinitesimal motions. Row dependencies or self-stresses allow for new interpretations of classical geometric incidence theorems. We show that self-stresses are characterized by a 3-fold balance. As expected, infinitesimal (first order) projective rigidity as well as second order projective rigidity imply projective rigidity but not conversely. Several open problems and possible generalizations are indicated.
Projective rigidity of point-line configurations in the plane
In this paper, we establish a general setup for studying incidence-preserving motions of projective geometric configurations of points and lines via a "projective rigidity matrix". The spaces of infinitesimal motions of a point-line configuration and dependencies amongst the point-line incidences can be interpreted as the kernel and co-kernel of this projective rigidity matrix, respectively. We also introduce a symmetry-adapted projective rigidity matrix for analysing symmetric configurations and their symmetry-preserving motions. The symmetry may be a point group or a more general symmetry, such as an autopolarity.
Canonical binary $Δ$-matroids
Published • View PublicationBIB
The handle slide operation, originally defined for ribbon graphs, was extended to delta-matroids by I. Moffatt and E. Mphako-Bandab, who show that, using a delta-matroid analogue of handle slides, every binary delta-matroid in which the empty set is feasible can be written in a canonical form analogous to the canonical form for one-vertex maps on a surface. We provide a canonical form for binary delta-matroids without restriction on the feasibility of the empty set.
Generate $Δ$-matroids from matroids
We give necessary and sufficient conditions for two matroids on the same ground set to be the upper and lower matroid of a $Δ$-matroid.
Maps and $Δ$-matroids revisited
Published • View PublicationBIB
Using Tutte's combinatorial definition of a map we define a $Δ$-matroid purely combinatorially and show that it is identical to Bouchet's topological definition.
Non-crossing frameworks with non-crossing reciprocals
Published in Discrete Comput. Geom., 32:4 (2004), 567-600 • View PublicationBIB
We study non-crossing frameworks in the plane for which the classical reciprocal on the dual graph is also non-crossing. We give a complete description of the self-stresses on non-crossing frameworks whose reciprocals are non-crossing, in terms of: the types of faces (only pseudo-triangles and pseudo-quadrangles are allowed); the sign patterns in the self-stress; and a geometric condition on the stress vectors at some of the vertices. As in other recent papers where the interplay of non-crossingness and rigidity of straight-line plane graphs is studied, pseudo-triangulations show up as objects of special interest. For example, it is known that all planar Laman circuits can be embedded as a pseudo-triangulation with one non-pointed vertex. We show that if such an embedding is sufficiently generic, then the reciprocal is non-crossing and again a pseudo-triangulation embedding of a planar Laman circuit. For a singular (i.e., non-generic) pseudo-triangulation embedding of a planar Laman circuit, the reciprocal is still non-crossing and a pseudo-triangulation, but its underlying graph may not be a Laman circuit. Moreover, all the pseudo-triangulations which admit a non-crossing reciprocal arise as the reciprocals of such, possibly singular, stresses on pseudo-triangulation embeddings of Laman circuits. All self-stresses on a planar graph correspond to liftings to piece-wise linear surfaces in 3-space. We prove characteristic geometric properties of the lifts of such non-crossing reciprocal pairs.
Combinatorial pseudo-Triangulations
Published in Discrete Mathematics 307:3-5, (2007), 554-566 • View PublicationBIB
We prove that a planar graph is generically rigid in the plane if and only if it can be embedded as a pseudo-triangulation. This generalizes the main result of math.CO/0307347 which treats the minimally generically rigid case. The proof uses the concept of combinatorial pseudo-triangulation, CPT, in the plane and has two main steps: showing that a certain ``generalized Laman property'' is a necessary and sufficient condition for a CPT to be ``stretchable'', and showing that all generically rigid plane graphs admit a CPT assignment with that property. Additionally, we propose the study of combinatorial pseudo-triangulations on closed surfaces.
Planar Minimally Rigid Graphs and Pseudo-Triangulations
Published in Computational Geometry: theory and Applications 31:1-2 (May 2005), 63-100. • View PublicationBIB
Pointed pseudo-triangulations are planar minimally rigid graphs embedded in the plane with pointed vertices (adjacent to an angle larger than 180 degrees. In this paper we prove that the opposite statement is also true, namely that planar minimally rigid graphs always admit pointed embeddings, even under certain natural topological and combinatorial constraints. We provide two proofs, which both yield efficient embedding algorithms. One based on Henneberg inductive constructions from combinatorial rigidity theory, the other on a generalization of Tutte's barycentric embeddings to directed graphs.