arXiv++ Combinatorics

Given a graph $G$ with vertex set $V(G)$, a mapping $h : V(G) \rightarrow \lbrace 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 \rbrace$ is called a quadruple Roman dominating function (4RDF) for $G$ if it holds the following. Every vertex $x$ such that $h(x)\in \{0,1,2, 3\}$ satisfies that $h(N[x]) = \sum_{v\in N[x]} h(v) \geq |\{y:y \in N(x) \; \text{and} \; h(y) \neq 0\}|+4$, where $N(x)$ and $N[x]$ stands for the open and closed neighborhood of $x$, respectively. The smallest possible weight $\sum_{x \in V(G)} h(x)$ among all possible 4RDFs $h$ for $G$ is the quadruple Roman domination number of $G$, denoted by $γ_{[4R]}(G)$. This work is focused on complexity aspects for the problem of computing the value of this parameter for several graph classes. Specifically, it is shown that the decision problem concerning $γ_{[4R]}(G)$ is NP-complete when restricted to star convex bipartite, comb convex bipartite, split and planar graphs. In contrast, it is also proved that such problem can be efficiently solved for threshold graphs where an exact solution is demonstrated, while for graphs having an efficient dominating set, tight upper and lower bounds in terms of the classical domination number are given. In addition, some approximation results to the problem are given. That is, we show that the problem cannot be approximated within $(1 - ε) \ln |V|$ for any $ε> 0$ unless $P=NP$. An approximation algorithm for it is proposed, and its APX-completeness proved, whether graphs of maximum degree four are considered. Finally, an integer linear programming formulation for our problem is presented.

The concept of mutual visibility in graphs, introduced recently, addresses a fundamental problem in Graph Theory concerning the identification of the largest set of vertices in a graph such that any two vertices have a shortest path connecting them, excluding internal vertices of the set. Originally motivated by some challenges in Computer Science related to robot navigation, the problem seeks to ensure unobstructed communication channels between navigating entities. The mutual-visibility problem involves determining a largest mutual-visibility set in a graph. The mutual-visibility number of a graph represents the cardinality of the largest mutual-visibility set. This concept has sparked significant research interest, leading to connections with classical combinatorial problems like the Zarankiewicz problem and Turán-type problems. In this paper, we consider practical limitations in network visibility and our investigation extends the original concept to $k$-distance mutual-visibility. In this case, a pair of vertices is considered $S$-visible if a shortest path of length at most $k$ exists, excluding internal vertices belonging to the set $S$. The $k$-distance mutual-visibility number represents the cardinality of a largest $k$-distance mutual-visibility set. We initiate the study of this new graph parameter. We prove that the associate decision problem belongs to the NP-complete class. We also give some properties and tight bounds, as well as, the exact value of such parameter for some particular non trivial graph classes.

Consider a finite and simple graph $G=(V,E)$ with maximum degree $Δ$. A strong Roman dominating function over the graph $G$ is understood as a map $f : V (G)\rightarrow \{0, 1,\ldots , \left\lceil \fracΔ{2}\right\rceil+ 1\}$ which carries out the condition stating that all the vertices $v$ labeled $f(v)=0$ are adjacent to at least one another vertex $u$ that satisfies $f(u)\geq 1+ \left\lceil \frac{1}{2}\vert N(u)\cap V_0\vert \right\rceil$, such that $V_0=\{v \in V \mid f(v)=0 \}$ and the notation $N(u)$ stands for the open neighborhood of $u$. The total version of one strong Roman dominating function includes the additional property concerning the not existence of vertices of degree zero in the subgraph of $G$, induced by the set of vertices labeled with a positive value. The minimum possible value for the sum $ω(f)=f(V)=\sum_{v\in V} f(v)$ (also called the weight of $f$), taken amongst all existent total strong Roman dominating functions $f$ of $G$, is called the total strong Roman domination number of $G$, denoted by $γ_{StR}^t(G)$. This total and strong version of the Roman domination number (for graphs) is introduced in this research, and the study of its mathematical properties is therefore initiated. For instance, we establish upper bounds for such parameter, and relate it with several parameters related to vertex domination in graphs, from which we remark the standard domination number, the total version of the standard domination number and the (strong) Roman domination number. In addition, among other results, we show that for any tree $T$ of order $n(T)\ge 3$, with maximum degree $Δ(T)$ and $s(T)$ support vertices, $γ_{StR}^t(T)\ge \left\lceil \frac{n(T)+s(T)}{Δ(T)}\right\rceil+1$.

The strong resolving graph $G_{SR}$ of a connected graph $G$ was introduced in [Discrete Applied Mathematics 155 (1) (2007) 356--364] as a tool to study the strong metric dimension of $G$. Basically, it was shown that the problem of finding the strong metric dimension of $G$ can be transformed to the problem of finding the vertex cover number of $G_{SR}$. Since then, several articles dealing with this subject have been published. In this paper, we survey the state of knowledge on the strong resolving graph and also derive some new results.

Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space. A set $S\subseteq X$ is said to be a $k$-metric generator for $X$ if and only if for any pair of different points $u,v\in X$, there exist at least $k$ points $w_1,w_2, \ldots w_k\in S$ such that $d(u,w_i)\ne d(v,w_i),\; \mbox{\rm for all}\; i\in \{1, \ldots k\}.$ Let $\mathcal{R}_k(X)$ be the set of metric generators for $X$. The $k$-metric dimension $\dim_k(X)$ of $(X,d)$ is defined as $$\dim_k(X)=\inf\{|S|:\, S\in \mathcal{R}_k(X)\}.$$ Here, we discuss the $k$-metric dimension of $(V,d_t)$, where $V$ is the set of vertices of a simple graph $G$ and the metric $d_t:V\times V\rightarrow \mathbb{N}\cup \{0\}$ is defined by $d_t(x,y)=\min\{d(x,y),t\}$ from the geodesic distance $d$ in $G$ and a positive integer $t$. The case $t\ge D(G)$, where $D(G)$ denotes the diameter of $G$, corresponds to the original theory of $k$-metric dimension and the case $t=2$ corresponds to the theory of $k$-adjacency dimension. Furthermore, this approach allows us to extend the theory of $k$-metric dimension to the general case of non-necessarily connected graphs.

Given a simple and connected graph $G=(V,E)$, and a positive integer $k$, a set $S\subseteq V$ is said to be a $k$-metric generator for $G$, if for any pair of different vertices $u,v\in V$, there exist at least $k$ vertices $w_1,w_2,\ldots,w_k\in S$ such that $d_G(u,w_i)\ne d_G(v,w_i)$, for every $i\in \{1,\ldots,k\}$, where $d_G(x,y)$ denotes the distance between $x$ and $y$. The minimum cardinality of a $k$-metric generator is the $k$-metric dimension of $G$. A set $S\subseteq V$ is a $k$-adjacency generator for $G$ if any two different vertices $x,y\in V(G)$ satisfy $|((N_G(x)\triangledown N_G(y))\cup\{x,y\})\cap S|\ge k$, where $N_G(x)\triangledown N_G(y)$ is the symmetric difference of the neighborhoods of $x$ and $y$. The minimum cardinality of any $k$-adjacency generator is the $k$-adjacency dimension of $G$. In this article we obtain tight bounds and closed formulae for the $k$-metric dimension of the lexicographic product of graphs in terms of the $k$-adjacency dimension of the factor graphs.

Let $G$ be a connected graph. Given an ordered set $W = \{w_1, w_2,\dots w_k\}\subseteq V(G)$ and a vertex $u\in V(G)$, the representation of $u$ with respect to $W$ is the ordered $k$-tuple $(d(u,w_1), d(u,w_2),\dots,$ $d(u,w_k))$, where $d(u,w_i)$ denotes the distance between $u$ and $w_i$. The set $W$ is a metric generator for $G$ if every two different vertices of $G$ have distinct representations. A minimum cardinality metric generator is called a \emph{metric basis} of $G$ and its cardinality is called the \emph{metric dimension} of G. It is well known that the problem of finding the metric dimension of a graph is NP-Hard. In this paper we obtain closed formulae for the metric dimension of graphs with cut vertices. The main results are applied to specific constructions including rooted product graphs, corona product graphs, block graphs and chains of graphs.

Given a set of vertices $S=\{v_1,v_2,...,v_k\}$ of a connected graph $G$, the metric representation of a vertex $v$ of $G$ with respect to $S$ is the vector $r(v|S)=(d(v,v_1),d(v,v_2),...,d(v,v_k))$, where $d(v,v_i)$, $i\in \{1,...,k\}$ denotes the distance between $v$ and $v_i$. $S$ is a resolving set of $G$ if for every pair of vertices $u,v$ of $G$, $r(u|S)\ne r(v|S)$. The metric dimension $dim(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of any resolving set of $G$. Given an ordered partition $Π=\{P_1,P_2, ...,P_t\}$ of vertices of a connected graph $G$, the partition representation of a vertex $v$ of $G$, with respect to the partition $Π$ is the vector $r(v|Π)=(d(v,P_1),d(v,P_2),...,d(v,P_t))$, where $d(v,P_i)$, $1\leq i\leq t$, represents the distance between the vertex $v$ and the set $P_i$, that is $d(v,P_i)=\min_{u\in P_i}\{d(v,u)\}$. $Π$ is a resolving partition for $G$ if for every pair of vertices $u,v$ of $G$, $r(u|Π)\ne r(v|Π)$. The partition dimension $pd(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum number of sets in any resolving partition for $G$. Let $G$ and $H$ be two graphs of order $n_1$ and $n_2$ respectively. The corona product $G\odot H$ is defined as the graph obtained from $G$ and $H$ by taking one copy of $G$ and $n_1$ copies of $H$ and then joining by an edge, all the vertices from the $i^{th}$-copy of $H$ with the $i^{th}$-vertex of $G$. Here we study the relationship between $pd(G\odot H)$ and several parameters of the graphs $G\odot H$, $G$ and $H$, including $dim(G\odot H)$, $pd(G)$ and $pd(H)$.

We show that the principal results of the article "The metric dimension of graph with pendant edges" [Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing, 65 (2008) 139--145] do not hold. In this paper we correct the results and we solve two open problems described in the above mentioned paper.

Given a set of vertices $S=\{v_1,v_2,...,v_k\}$ of a connected graph $G$, the metric representation of a vertex $v$ of $G$ with respect to $S$ is the vector $r(v|S)=(d(v,v_1),d(v,v_2),...,d(v,v_k))$, where $d(v,v_i)$, $i\in \{1,...,k\}$ denotes the distance between $v$ and $v_i$. $S$ is a resolving set for $G$ if for every pair of vertices $u,v$ of $G$, $r(u|S)\ne r(v|S)$. The metric dimension of $G$, $dim(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of any resolving set for $G$. Let $G$ and $H$ be two graphs of order $n_1$ and $n_2$, respectively. The corona product $G\odot H$ is defined as the graph obtained from $G$ and $H$ by taking one copy of $G$ and $n_1$ copies of $H$ and joining by an edge each vertex from the $i^{th}$-copy of $H$ with the $i^{th}$-vertex of $G$. For any integer $k\ge 2$, we define the graph $G\odot^k H$ recursively from $G\odot H$ as $G\odot^k H=(G\odot^{k-1} H)\odot H$. We give several results on the metric dimension of $G\odot^k H$. For instance, we show that given two connected graphs $G$ and $H$ of order $n_1\ge 2$ and $n_2\ge 2$, respectively, if the diameter of $H$ is at most two, then $dim(G\odot^k H)=n_1(n_2+1)^{k-1}dim(H)$. Moreover, if $n_2\ge 7$ and the diameter of $H$ is greater than five or $H$ is a cycle graph, then $dim(G\odot^k H)=n_1(n_2+1)^{k-1}dim(K_1\odot H).$

Let $Γ=(V,E)$ be a simple graph. For a nonempty set $X\subseteq V$, and a vertex $v\in V$, $δ_{X}(v)$ denotes the number of neighbors $v$ has in $X$. A nonempty set $S\subseteq V$ is a \emph{defensive $k$-alliance} in $Γ=(V,E)$ if $δ_S(v)\ge δ_{\bar{S}}(v)+k,$ $\forall v\in S.$ The defensive $k$-alliance number of $Γ$, denoted by $a_k(Γ)$, is defined as the minimum cardinality of a defensive $k$-alliance in $Γ$. We study the mathematical properties of $a_k(Γ)$.

A \emph{defensive} (\emph{offensive}) $k$-\emph{alliance} in $Γ=(V,E)$ is a set $S\subseteq V$ such that every $v$ in $S$ (in the boundary of $S$) has at least $k$ more neighbors in $S$ than it has in $V\setminus S$. A set $X\subseteq V$ is \emph{defensive} (\emph{offensive}) $k$-\emph{alliance free,} if for all defensive (offensive) $k$-alliance $S$, $S\setminus X\neq\emptyset$, i.e., $X$ does not contain any defensive (offensive) $k$-alliance as a subset. A set $Y \subseteq V$ is a \emph{defensive} (\emph{offensive}) $k$-\emph{alliance cover}, if for all defensive (offensive) $k$-alliance $S$, $S\cap Y\neq\emptyset$, i.e., $Y$ contains at least one vertex from each defensive (offensive) $k$-alliance of $Γ$. In this paper we show several mathematical properties of defensive (offensive) $k$-alliance free sets and defensive (offensive) $k$-alliance cover sets, including tight bounds on the cardinality of defensive (offensive) $k$-alliance free (cover) sets.