arXiv++ Combinatorics

We relate the nontrivial singular values $σ_2,\ldots,σ_n$ of the normalized adjacency matrix of an Eulerian directed graph to combinatorial measures of graph expansion: \\ 1. We introduce a new directed analogue of conductance $φ_{dir}$, and prove a Cheeger-like inequality showing that $φ_{dir}$ is bounded away from 0 iff $σ_2$ is bounded away from 1. In undirected graphs, this can be viewed as a unification of the standard Cheeger Inequality and Trevisan's Cheeger Inequality for the smallest eigenvalue.\\ 2. We prove a singular-value analogue of the Higher-Order Cheeger Inequalities, giving a combinatorial characterization of when $σ_k$ is bounded away from 1. \\ 3. We tighten the relationship between $σ_2$ and vertex expansion, proving that if a $d$-regular graph $G$ with the property that all sets $S$ of size at most $n/2$ have at least $(1+δ)\cdot |S|$ out-neighbors, then $1-σ_2=Ω(δ^2/d)$. This bound is tight and saves a factor of $d$ over the previously known relationship.

Whether or not the Sparsest Cut problem admits an efficient $O(1)$-approximation algorithm is a fundamental algorithmic question with connections to geometry and the Unique Games Conjecture. Revisiting spectral algorithms for Sparsest Cut, we present a novel, simple algorithm that combines eigenspace enumeration with a new algorithm for the Cut Improvement problem. The runtime of our algorithm is parametrized by a quantity that we call the solution dimension $\text{SD}_\varepsilon(G)$: the smallest $k$ such that the subspace spanned by the first $k$ Laplacian eigenvectors contains all but $\varepsilon$ fraction of a sparsest cut. Our algorithm matches the guarantees of prior methods based on the threshold-rank paradigm, while also extending beyond them. To illustrate this, we study its performance on low degree Cayley graphs over Abelian groups -- canonical examples of graphs with poor expansion properties. We prove that low degree Abelian Cayley graphs have small solution dimension, yielding an algorithm that computes a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation to the uniform Sparsest Cut of a degree-$d$ Cayley graph over an Abelian group of size $n$ in time $n^{O(1)}\cdot\exp(d/\varepsilon)^{O(d)}$. Along the way to bounding the solution dimension of Abelian Cayley graphs, we analyze their sparse cuts and spectra, proving that the collection of $O(1)$-approximate sparsest cuts has an $\varepsilon$-net of size $\exp(d/\varepsilon)^{O(d)}$ and that the multiplicity of $λ_2$ is bounded by $2^{O(d)}$. The latter bound is tight and improves on a previous bound of $2^{O(d^2)}$ by Lee and Makarychev.

Let $G$ be a multipartite graph with partition $V_1, V_2,\ldots, V_k$ of $V(G)$. Let $d_{i,j}$ denote the edge density of the pair $(V_i, V_j)$. An independent transversal is an independent set of $G$ with exactly one vertex in each $V_i$. In this paper, we prove an asymptotically sharp upper bound on the maximum number of independent transversals given the $d_{i,j}$'s.

For a graph $H$ and an integer $k\ge1$, let $r(H;k)$ and $r_\ell(H;k)$ denote the $k$-color Ramsey number and list Ramsey number of $H$, respectively. Alon, Bucić, Kalvari, Kuperwasser and Szabó in 2021 initiated the systematic study of list Ramsey numbers of graphs and hypergraphs, and conjectured that $ r(K_{1,n};k)$ and $r_\ell(K_{1,n};k)$ are always equal. Motivated by their work, we study the $k$-color Ramsey number for double stars $S(n,m)$, where $n\ge m\ge1$. To the best of our knowledge, little is known on the exact value of $r(S(n,m);k)$ when $k\ge3$. A classic result of Erdős and Graham from 1975 asserts that $r(T;k)>k(n-1)+1$ for every tree $T$ with $n\ge 1$ edges and $k$ sufficiently large such that $n$ divides $k-1$. Using a folklore double counting argument in set system and the edge chromatic number of complete graphs, we prove that if $k$ is odd and $n$ is sufficiently large compared with $m$ and $k$, then \[ r(S(n,m);k)=kn+m+2.\] This is a step in our effort to determine whether $r(S(n,m);k)$ and $r_\ell(S(n,m);k)$ are always equal, which remains wide open. We also prove that $ r(S^m_n;k)=k(n-1)+m+2$ if $k $ is odd and $n$ is sufficiently large compared with $m$ and $k$, where $1\le m\le n$ and $S^m_n$ is obtained from $K_{1, n}$ by subdividing $m$ edges each exactly once. We end the paper with some observations towards the list Ramsey number for $S(n,m)$ and $S^m_n$.