arXiv++ Combinatorics

Consider a connected graph $G$, and assume that every edge fails independently with probability $q$. The {\em (all-terminal) reliability polynomial} is the probability in $q$ that the spanning connected subgraph of operational edges is connected. In this paper we focus on the real roots of reliability polynomials ({\em reliability roots}). We prove that almost every graph has a nonreal reliability root, and that the reliability polynomials of graphs have roots dense on the interval $[β,0]$ where $β\approx-0.5707202942$.

The degree polynomial of a multigraph $G$ is given by $\sum _{v \in V(G)} x^{\mbox{deg}(v)}$. We investigate here properties of the roots of such polynomials. In addition to examining the roots for some families of graphs with few and many degrees, we provide some bounds on the moduli of the roots. We also propose a region that contains all roots for multigraphs of order $n$.

A common model of robustness of a graph against random failures has all vertices operational, but the edges independently operational with probability $p$. One can ask for the probability that all vertices can communicate ({\em all-terminal reliability}) or that two specific vertices (or {\em terminals}) can communicate with each other ({\em two-terminal reliability}). A relatively new measure is {\em split reliability}, where for two fixed vertices $s$ and $t$, we consider the probability that every vertex communicates with one of $s$ or $t$, but not both. In this paper, we explore the existence for fixed numbers $n \geq 2$ and $m \geq n-1$ of an {\em optimal} connected $(n,m)$-graph $G_{n,m}$ for split reliability, that is, a connected graph with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges for which for any other such graph $H$, the split reliability of $G_{n,m}$ is at least as large as that of $H$, for {\em all} values of $p \in [0,1]$. Unlike the similar problems for all-terminal and two-terminal reliability, where only partial results are known, we completely solve the issue for split reliability, where we show that there is an optimal $(n,m)$-graph for split reliability if and only if $n\leq 3$, $m=n-1$, or $n=m=4$.

A dominating set $S$ of a graph $G$ of order $n$ is a subset of the vertices of $G$ such that every vertex is either in $S$ or adjacent to a vertex of $S$. The domination polynomial is defined by $D(G,x) = \sum d_k x^k$ where $d_k$ is the number of dominating sets in $G$ with cardinality $k$. In this paper we show that the closure of the real roots of domination polynomials is $(-\infty,0]$.

A polynomial is said to be unimodal if its coefficients are non-decreasing and then non-increasing. The domination polynomial of a graph $G$ is the generating function of the number of domination sets of each cardinality in $G$, and its coefficients have been conjectured to be unimodal. In this paper we will show the domination polynomial of paths, cycles and complete multipartite graphs are unimodal, and that the domination polynomial of almost every graph is unimodal with mode $ \lceil \frac{n}{2}\rceil $.

For each nonnegative integer $i$, let $a_i$ be the number of $i$-subsets of $V(G)$ that induce an acyclic subgraph of a given graph $G$. We define $A(G,x) = \sum_{i \geq 0} a_i x^i$ (the generating function for $a_i$) to be the acyclic polynomial for $G$. After presenting some properties of these polynomials, we investigate the nature and location of their roots.

This papers focuses on the average order of dominating sets of a graph. We find the extremal graphs for the maximum and minimum value over all graphs on $n$ vertices, while for trees we prove that the star minimizes the average order of dominating sets. We prove the average order of dominating sets in graphs without isolated vertices is at most $3n/4$, but provide evidence that the actual upper bound is $2n/3$. Finally, we show that the normalized average, while dense in $[1/2,1]$, tends to $\frac{1}{2}$ for almost all graphs.

The independence polynomial of a graph is the generating polynomial for the number of independent sets of each cardinality and its roots are called independence roots. We investigate here purely imaginary independence roots. We show that there are infinitely many connected graphs with purely imaginary independence roots and that every graph is a subgraph of such a graph. We also classify every rational purely imaginary number that is an independence root.

Given a connected graph $G$ whose vertices are perfectly reliable and whose edges each fail independently with probability $q\in[0,1],$ the \textit{(all-terminal) reliability} of $G$ is the probability that the resulting subgraph of operational edges contains a spanning tree (this probability is always a polynomial in $q$). The location of the roots of reliability polynomials has been well studied, with particular interest in finding those with the largest moduli. In this paper, we will discuss a related problem -- among all reliability polynomials of graphs on $n$ vertices, which has a root of smallest modulus? We prove that, provided $n \geq 3$, the roots of smallest moduli occur precisely for the cycle graph $C_n$, and the root is unique.

The independence polynomial of a graph is the generating polynomial for the number of independent sets of each size and its roots are called independence roots. We bound the maximum modulus, $\mbox{maxmod}(n)$, of an independence root over all graphs on $n$ vertices and the maximum modulus, $\mbox{maxmod}_{T}(n)$, of an independence root over all trees on $n$ vertices in terms of $n$. In particular, we show that $$\frac{\log_3(\mbox{maxmod}(n))}{n}=\frac{1}{3}+o(1)$$ and $$\frac{\log_2(\mbox{maxmod}_{T}(n))}{n}=\frac{1}{2}+o(1).$$

For a tree $T$, the subtree polynomial of $T$ is the generating polynomial for the number of subtrees of $T$. We show that the complex roots of the subtree polynomial are contained in the disk $\left\{z\in\mathbb{C}\colon\ |z|\leq 1+\sqrt[3]{3}\right\}$, and that $K_{1,3}$ is the only tree whose subtree polynomial has a root on the boundary. We also prove that the closure of the collection of all real roots of subtree polynomials contains the interval $[-2,-1]$, while the intervals $(\infty,-1-\sqrt[3]{3})$, $[-1,0)$, and $(0,\infty)$ are root-free.

The independence polynomial of a graph is the generating polynomial for the number of independent sets of each size. Two graphs are said to be \textit{independence equivalent} if they have equivalent independence polynomials. We extend previous work by showing that independence equivalence class of every odd path has size 1, while the class can contain arbitrarily many graphs for even paths. We also prove that the independence equivalence class of every even cycle consists of two graphs when $n\ge 2$ except the independence equivalence class of $C_6$ which consists of three graphs. The odd case remains open, although, using irreducibility results from algebra, we were able show that for a prime $p \geq 5$ and $n\ge 1$ the independence equivalence class of $C_{p^n}$ consists of only two graphs.

The Wiener polynomial of a connected graph $G$ is defined as $W(G;x)=\sum x^{d(u,v)}$, where $d(u,v)$ denotes the distance between $u$ and $v$, and the sum is taken over all unordered pairs of distinct vertices of $G$. We examine the nature and location of the roots of Wiener polynomials of graphs, and in particular trees. We show that while the maximum modulus among all roots of Wiener polynomials of graphs of order $n$ is $\binom{n}{2}-1$, the maximum modulus among all roots of Wiener polynomials of trees of order $n$ grows linearly in $n$. We prove that the closure of the collection of real roots of Wiener polynomials of all graphs is precisely $(-\infty, 0]$, while in the case of trees, it contains $(-\infty, -1]$. Finally, we demonstrate that the imaginary parts and (positive) real parts of roots of Wiener polynomials can be arbitrarily large.

A dominating set $S$ of a graph $G$ of order $n$ is a subset of the vertices of $G$ such that every vertex is either in $S$ or adjacent to a vertex of $S$. %The domination number $G$, denoted $γ(G)$, is the cardinality of the smallest dominating set of $G$. The domination polynomial is defined by $D(G,x) = \sum d(G,i)x^i$ where $d(G,i)$ is the number of dominating sets in $G$ with cardinality $i$. Two graphs $G$ and $H$ are considered $\mathcal{D}$-equivalent if $D(G,x)=D(H,x)$. The equivalence class of $G$, denoted $[G]$, is the set of all graphs $\mathcal{D}$-equivalent to $G$. Extending previous results, we determine the equivalence classes of all paths.

The independence polynomial $i(G,x)$ of a graph $G$ is the generating function of the numbers of independent sets of each size. A graph of order $n$ is very well-covered if every maximal independent set has size $n/2$. Levit and Mandrescu conjectured that the independence polynomial of every very well-covered graph is unimodal (that is, the sequence of coefficients is nondecreasing, then nonincreasing). In this article we show that every graph is embeddable as an induced subgraph of a very well-covered graph whose independence polynomial is unimodal, by considering the location of the roots of such polynomials.

While much attention has been directed to the maximum modulus and maximum real part of chromatic roots of graphs of order $n$ (that is, with $n$ vertices), relatively little is known about the maximum imaginary part of such graphs. We prove that the maximum imaginary part can grow linearly in the order of the graph. We also show that for any fixed $p \in (0,1)$, almost every random graph $G$ in the Erdös-Rényi model has a non-real root.

A {\em restraint} on a (finite undirected) graph $G = (V,E)$ is a function $r$ on $V$ such that $r(v)$ is a finite subset of ${\mathbb N}$; a proper vertex colouring $c$ of $G$ is {\em permitted} by $r$ if $c(v) \not\in r(v)$ for all vertices $v$ of $G$ (we think of $r(v)$ as the set of colours {\em forbidden} at $v$). Given a large number of colors, for restraints $r$ with exactly one colour forbidden at each vertex the smallest number of colorings is permitted when $r$ is a constant function, but the problem of what restraints permit the largest number of colourings is more difficult. We determine such extremal restraints for complete graphs and trees.