Papers by Iain Beaton
13 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
A dichotomy for the number of vertex-critical ($P_5$, $H$)-free graphs when $H$ is bipartite
A graph $G$ is $k$-vertex-critical if $χ(G)=k$, but $χ(H)<k$ for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$. A graph $G$ is $(H_1,H_2,\dots,H_m)$-free if does not contain $H_i$ as an induced subgraph for any $i\in\{1,2,\dots,m\}$.We provide the following dichotomy that for bipartite graphs $H$ and any fixed integer $k\ge 5$ , there are only finitely many $k$-vertex-critical $(P_5,H)$-free graphs if and only if $H$ is $2P_2$-free. This leads us to pose the problem about determining for which graphs $H$ with $χ(H)\ge 3$ there are infinitely many $k$-vertex-critical $(P_5,H)$-free graphs for all $k\ge 5$. Toward this problem, we show that there only finitely many $k$-vertex-critical $(P_5, K_{s,t}+e)$-free graphs for all $k,s,t\ge 1$, where $K_{s,t}+e$ is a complete bipartite graph plus a single edge. On the other hand, we show that there are infinitely many $k$-vertex-critical $(P_5,\operatorname{net},\operatorname{co-net},\overline{C_5},\overline{C_6},\dots\overline{C_{k-1}})$-free graphs for all $k\ge 5$. We also show that there are only finitely many $k$-vertex-critical $(P_4+\ell P_1,\overline{L(K_{2,n})})$-free graphs for all $\ell,n\ge 0$, providing the largest known subfamily of $(P_4+\ell P_1)$-free graphs to satisfy this property.
Our results, together with known results, imply the existence of new polynomial-time certifying algorithms to determine the $k$-colourability of many subfamilies of $P_5$-free and $(P_4+\ell P_1)$-free graphs for fixed $k\ge 5$. Our proof techniques apply a powerful theorem of Chudnovsky, Kim, Oum, and Seymour (2016) on prime graphs that we expect to be of interest and have further applications to bounding the number of $k$-vertex-critical graphs in other hereditary families of graphs.
Vertex-critical graphs in subfamilies of $(P_4+\ell P_1)$-free graphs
A graph $G$ is $k$-vertex-critical if $χ(G)=k$ but $χ(G-v)<k$ for all $v\in V(G)$. In this paper we make progress on the open problem of the finiteness of $k$-vertex-critical $(P_4+\ell P_1)$-free graphs by showing that there are only finitely many $k$-vertex-critical graphs in the following subfamilies of $(P_4+\ell P_1)$-free graphs for all $k\ge 1$ and $\ell\ge 0$:
$\bullet$ $(P_4+\ell P_1,\text{chair})$-free graphs,
$\bullet$ $(P_4+\ell P_1,P_5,\text{bull})$-free graphs, and
$\bullet$ $(P_4+\ell P_1,P_5,\text{cricket})$-free graphs.
In fact, all but the first of these are special cases of our general result that there are only finitely many $k$-vertex-critical $(P_4+\ell P_1,B_{4}(m),B_{3}(m)^{+})$-free graphs for all $k\ge 1$ and $\ell,m\ge 0$. Here $B_{n}(m)$ is the graph obtained from a path of order $n$ by identifying one of its leaves with the centre vertex of $K_{1,m}$ and $B_{n}(m)^{+}$ is the graph obtained by identifying an edge of $K_3$ with the edge of $B_{n}(m)$ with endpoints of degrees $2$ and $m$, respectively. Our results imply the existence of simple polynomial-time certifying algorithms to decide the $k$-colourability of all graphs in these subfamilies for every fixed $k$.
We also show that $χ(G)\le \ell+2$ for all $(P_4+\ell P_1,K_3)$-free graphs and all $\ell\ge 0$, improving the previously known upper bound of $2\ell+2$ that followed from Randerath and Schiermeyer's 2004 result on $(P_t,K_3)$-free graphs. More generally, we provide a $χ$-bound in $O(\ell^{ω-1})$ for $(P_4+\ell P_1)$-free graphs which improves the bound of $(2\ell+2)^{ω-1}$ which followed from Gravier, Hoàng and Maffray in 2003 for $P_{t}$-free graphs.
Critical $(P_5,W_4)$-Free Graphs
A graph $G$ is $k$-vertex-critical if $χ(G) = k$ but $χ(G-v)<k$ for all $v \in V(G)$. A graph is $(H_1,H_2)$-free if it contains no induced subgraph isomorphic to $H_1$ nor $H_2$. A $W_4$ is the graph consisting of a $C_4$ plus an additional vertex adjacent to all the vertices of the $C_4$.
We show that there are finitely many $k$-vertex-critical $(P_5,W_4)$-free graphs for all $k \ge 1$ and we characterize all $5$-vertex-critical $(P_5,W_4)$-free graphs. Our results imply the existence of a polynomial-time certifying algorithm to decide the $k$-colorability of $(P_5,W_4)$-free graphs for each $k \ge 1$ where the certificate is either a $k$-coloring or a $(k+1)$-vertex-critical induced subgraph.
On the unimodality of nearly well-dominated trees
A polynomial is said to be unimodal if its coefficients are non-decreasing and then non-increasing. The domination polynomial of a graph $G$ is the generating function of the number of dominating sets of each cardinality in $G$. In \cite{IntroDomPoly2014} Alikhani and Peng conjectured that all domination polynomials are unimodal. In this paper we show that not all trees have log-concave domination polynomial. We also give non-increasing and non-decreasing segments of coefficents in trees. This allows us to show the domination polynomial trees with $Γ(T)-γ(T)<3$ are unimodal.
Reconfiguration graphs for minimal domination sets
A dominating set $S$ in a graph is a subset of vertices such that every vertex is either in $S$ or adjacent to a vertex in $S$. A minimal dominating set $M$ is a dominating set such that $M-v$ is not a dominating set for all $v \in M$. In this paper we introduce a reconfiguration graph $\mathcal{R}(G)$ for minimal dominating sets under a generalization of the token sliding model. We give some preliminary results which include showing that $\mathcal{R}(G)$ is connected for trees and split graphs. Additionally we classify all graphs which have $\mathcal{R}(G) = K_n$ and $\mathcal{R}(G) = \overline{K_n}$ for all $n$.
Vertex-critical graphs in co-gem-free graphs
A graph $G$ is $k$-vertex-critical if $χ(G)=k$ but $χ(G-v)<k$ for all $v\in V(G)$ and $(G,H)$-free if it contains no induced subgraph isomorphic to $G$ or $H$. We show that there are only finitely many $k$-vertex-critical (co-gem, $H$)-free graphs for all $k$ when $H$ is any graph of order $4$ by showing finiteness in the three remaining open cases, those are the cases when $H$ is $2P_2$, $K_3+P_1$, and $K_4$. For the first two cases we actually prove the stronger results:
$\bullet$ There are only finitely many $k$-vertex-critical (co-gem, paw$+P_1$)-free graphs for all $k$ and that only finitely many $k$-vertex-critical (co-gem, paw$+P_1$)-free graphs for all $k\ge 1$.
$\bullet$ There are only finitely many $k$-vertex-critical (co-gem, $P_5$, $P_3+cP_2$)-free graphs for all $k\ge 1$ and $c\ge 0$.
To prove the latter result, we employ a novel application of Sperner's Theorem on the number of antichains in a partially ordered set. Our result for $K_4$ uses exhaustive computer search and is proved by showing the stronger result that every $(\text{co-gem, }K_4)$-free graph is $4$-colourable. Our results imply the existence of simple polynomial-time certifying algorithms to decide the $k$-colourability of (co-gem, $H$)-free graphs for all $k$ and all $H$ of order $4$ by searching the vertex-critical graphs as induced subgraphs.
A Tight Upper Bound on the Average Order of Dominating Sets of a Graph
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
In this paper we study the the average order of dominating sets in a graph, $\operatorname{avd}(G)$. Like other average graph parameters, the extremal graphs are of interest. Beaton and Brown (2021) conjectured that for all graphs $G$ of order $n$ without isolated vertices, $\operatorname{avd}(G) \leq 2n/3$. Recently, Erey (2021) proved the conjecture for forests without isolated vertices. In this paper we prove the conjecture and classify which graphs have $\operatorname{avd}(G) = 2n/3$. We also use our bounds to prove the average version of Vizing's Conjecture.
On the Real Roots of Domination Polynomials
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
A dominating set $S$ of a graph $G$ of order $n$ is a subset of the vertices of $G$ such that every vertex is either in $S$ or adjacent to a vertex of $S$. The domination polynomial is defined by $D(G,x) = \sum d_k x^k$ where $d_k$ is the number of dominating sets in $G$ with cardinality $k$. In this paper we show that the closure of the real roots of domination polynomials is $(-\infty,0]$.
On the Unimodality of Domination Polynomials
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
A polynomial is said to be unimodal if its coefficients are non-decreasing and then non-increasing. The domination polynomial of a graph $G$ is the generating function of the number of domination sets of each cardinality in $G$, and its coefficients have been conjectured to be unimodal. In this paper we will show the domination polynomial of paths, cycles and complete multipartite graphs are unimodal, and that the domination polynomial of almost every graph is unimodal with mode $ \lceil \frac{n}{2}\rceil $.
The Average Order of Dominating Sets of a Graph
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
This papers focuses on the average order of dominating sets of a graph. We find the extremal graphs for the maximum and minimum value over all graphs on $n$ vertices, while for trees we prove that the star minimizes the average order of dominating sets. We prove the average order of dominating sets in graphs without isolated vertices is at most $3n/4$, but provide evidence that the actual upper bound is $2n/3$. Finally, we show that the normalized average, while dense in $[1/2,1]$, tends to $\frac{1}{2}$ for almost all graphs.
On the largest real root of the independence polynomial of a unicyclic graph
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
The independence polynomial of a graph $G$, denoted $I(G,x)$, is the generating polynomial for the number of independent sets of each size. The roots of $I(G,x)$ are called the \textit{independence roots} of $G$. It is known that for every graph $G$, the independence root of smallest modulus, denoted $ξ(G)$, is real. The relation $\preceq$ on the set of all graphs is defined as follows, $H\preceq G$ if and only if $I(H,x)\ge I(G,x)\text{ for all }x\in [ξ(G),0].$
We find the maximum and minimum connected unicyclic and connected well-covered unicyclic graphs of a given order with respect to $\preceq$. This extends 2013 work by Csikvári where the maximum and minimum trees of a given order were determined and also answers an open question posed in the same work. Corollaries of our results give the graphs that minimize and maximize $ξ(G)$ among all connected (well-covered) unicyclic graphs. We also answer more related open questions posed by Oboudi in 2018 and disprove a conjecture due to Levit and Mandrescu from 2008.
Independence Equivalence Classes of Paths and Cycles
The independence polynomial of a graph is the generating polynomial for the number of independent sets of each size. Two graphs are said to be \textit{independence equivalent} if they have equivalent independence polynomials. We extend previous work by showing that independence equivalence class of every odd path has size 1, while the class can contain arbitrarily many graphs for even paths. We also prove that the independence equivalence class of every even cycle consists of two graphs when $n\ge 2$ except the independence equivalence class of $C_6$ which consists of three graphs. The odd case remains open, although, using irreducibility results from algebra, we were able show that for a prime $p \geq 5$ and $n\ge 1$ the independence equivalence class of $C_{p^n}$ consists of only two graphs.
The Domination Equivalence Classes of Paths
A dominating set $S$ of a graph $G$ of order $n$ is a subset of the vertices of $G$ such that every vertex is either in $S$ or adjacent to a vertex of $S$. %The domination number $G$, denoted $γ(G)$, is the cardinality of the smallest dominating set of $G$. The domination polynomial is defined by $D(G,x) = \sum d(G,i)x^i$ where $d(G,i)$ is the number of dominating sets in $G$ with cardinality $i$. Two graphs $G$ and $H$ are considered $\mathcal{D}$-equivalent if $D(G,x)=D(H,x)$. The equivalence class of $G$, denoted $[G]$, is the set of all graphs $\mathcal{D}$-equivalent to $G$. Extending previous results, we determine the equivalence classes of all paths.