arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Jianbing Liu

5 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2026-09-07
Partial Petrial Polynomials of Bouquets
Gross, Mansour, and Tucker [European J. Combin., 95 (2021): 103329] introduced the \emph{partial Petrial polynomial} of a ribbon graph $G$, denoted by $^{\partial}{\varepsilon^{\times}_G}(z)$. For a prime bouquet $B_n$, Yan and Li [Discrete Appl. Math., 375 (2025): 281-289] determined $^{\partial}{\varepsilon^{\times}_{B_n}}(z)$ when the intersection graph $I(B_n)$ is either the complete graph or a path, and provided an equivalent condition under which the lowest degree of the nonzero coefficient in $^{\partial}{\varepsilon^{\times}_{B_n}}(z)$ is $1$. In this paper, we determine $^{\partial}{\varepsilon^{\times}_{B_n}}(z)$ when the intersection graph is a cycle. Moreover, we present a complete characterization of the prime bouquets whose lowest nonzero term in $^{\partial}{\varepsilon^{\times}_{B_n}}(z)$ is of degree $2$ and determine the partial Petrial polynomial for the prime bouquets. As corollaries, we determine $^{\partial}{\varepsilon^{\times}_{B_n}}(z)$ when $I(B_n)$ is the complete bipartite and tripartite graph.
2025-07-03
Oriented Diameter of Mixed Graphs with Given Maximum Undirected Degree
In 2018, Dankelmann, Gao, and Surmacs [J. Graph Theory, 88(1): 5--17, 2018] established sharp bounds on the oriented diameter of a bridgeless undirected graph and a bridgeless undirected bipartite graph in terms of vertex degree. In this paper, we extend these results to \emph{mixed graphs}, which contain both directed and undirected edges. Let the \emph{undirected degree} $d^*_G(x)$ of a vertex $x \in V(G)$ be the number of its incident undirected edges in a mixed graph $G$ of order $n$, and let the \emph{maximum undirected degree} be $Δ^*(G) = \max\{d^*_G(v) : v \in V(G)\}$. We prove that \begin{align*} \text{(1)}\quad & \overrightarrow{\mathrm{diam}}(G) \leq n - Δ^* + 3 && \text{if $G$ is undirected, or contains a vertex $u$ with $d^*_G(u) = Δ^*$} \\ & && \text{and $d^+_G(u) + d^-_G(u) \geq 2$, or $Δ^* = 5$ and $d^+_G(u) + d^-_G(u) = 1$;} \\ \text{(2)}\quad & \overrightarrow{\mathrm{diam}}(G) \leq n - Δ^* + 4 && \text{otherwise}. \end{align*} We also establish bounds for mixed bipartite graphs. If $G$ is a bridgeless mixed bipartite graph with partite sets $A$ and $B$, and $u \in B$, then \begin{align*} \text{(1)}\quad & \overrightarrow{\mathrm{diam}}(G) \leq 2(|A| - d(u)) + 7 && \text{if $G$ is undirected;\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ } \\ \text{(2)}\quad & \overrightarrow{\mathrm{diam}}(G) \leq 2(|A| - d^*(u)) + 8 && \text{if $d^+_G(u) + d^-_G(u) \geq 2$;} \\ \text{(3)}\quad & \overrightarrow{\mathrm{diam}}(G) \leq 2(|A| - d^*(u)) + 10 && \text{otherwise}. \end{align*} All of the above bounds are sharp, except possibly the last one.
2025-01-22
Complexity and Algorithm for the Matching vertex-cutset Problem
In 1985, Chvátal introduced the concept of star cutsets as a means to investigate the properties of perfect graphs, which inspired many researchers to study cutsets with some specific structures, for example, star cutsets, clique cutsets, stable cutsets. In recent years, approximation algorithms have developed rapidly, the computational complexity associated with determining the minimum vertex cut possessing a particular structural property have attracted considerable academic attention. In this paper, we demonstrate that determining whether there is a matching vertex-cutset in $H$ with size at most $k$, is $\mathbf{NP}$-complete, where $k$ is a given positive integer and $H$ is a connected graph. Furthermore, we demonstrate that for a connected graph $H$, there exists a $2$-approximation algorithm in $O(nm^2)$ for us to find a minimum matching vertex-cutset. Finally, we show that every plane graph $H$ satisfying $H\not\in\{K_2, K_4\}$ contains a matching vertex-cutset with size at most three, and this bound is tight.
Diameter two orientability of mixed graphs
In 1967, Katona and Szemerédi showed that no undirected graph with $n$ vertices and fewer than $\frac{n}{2}\log_2\frac{n}{2}$ edges admits an orientation of diameter two. In 1978, Chvátal and Thomassen revealed the complexity of determining whether an undirected graph can be oriented to achieve a diameter of two, proving it to be NP-complete. This breakthrough has sparked ongoing interest in identifying sufficient conditions for graphs to be oriented with the smallest possible diameter of two -- critical for optimizing communication and network flow in larger structures. In 2019, Czabarka, Dankelmann, and Székely significantly advanced this field by establishing that the minimum degree threshold for achieving such an orientation in undirected graphs of order $n$ is $\frac{n}{2} + Θ(\ln n)$. In this paper, we extend this foundational result by determining the minimum degree threshold necessary for realizing an orientation with diameter two in mixed graphs, which contain both undirected and directed edges. Mixed graphs offer a versatile framework, representing an intermediate stage in the orientation process, making our findings a substantial generalization of previous results.
A Note on Improved bounds for the Oriented Radius of Mixed Multigraphs
For a positive integer $r$, let $f(r)$ denote the smallest number such that any 2-edge connected mixed graph with radius $r$ has an oriented radius of at most $f(r)$. Recently, Babu, Benson, and Rajendraprasad significantly improved the upper bound of $f(r)$ by establishing that $f(r) \leq 1.5r^2 + r + 1$, see [Improved bounds for the oriented radius of mixed multigraphs, J. Graph Theory, 103 (2023), 674-689]. Additionally, they demonstrated that if each edge of a graph $G$ is contained within a cycle of length at most $η$, then the oriented radius of $G$ is at most $1.5rη$. The authors' results were derived through Observation 1, which served as the foundation for the development of Algorithm ORIENTOUT and Algorithm ORIENTIN. By integrating these algorithms, they obtained the improved bounds. However, an error has been identified in Observation 1, necessitating revisions to Algorithm ORIENTOUT and Algorithm ORIENTIN. In this note, we address the error and propose the necessary modifications to both algorithms, thereby ensuring the correctness of the conclusions.