arXiv++ Combinatorics

In 1967, Katona and Szemerédi showed that no undirected graph with $n$ vertices and fewer than $\frac{n}{2}\log_2\frac{n}{2}$ edges admits an orientation of diameter two. In 1978, Chvátal and Thomassen revealed the complexity of determining whether an undirected graph can be oriented to achieve a diameter of two, proving it to be NP-complete. This breakthrough has sparked ongoing interest in identifying sufficient conditions for graphs to be oriented with the smallest possible diameter of two -- critical for optimizing communication and network flow in larger structures. In 2019, Czabarka, Dankelmann, and Székely significantly advanced this field by establishing that the minimum degree threshold for achieving such an orientation in undirected graphs of order $n$ is $\frac{n}{2} + Θ(\ln n)$. In this paper, we extend this foundational result by determining the minimum degree threshold necessary for realizing an orientation with diameter two in mixed graphs, which contain both undirected and directed edges. Mixed graphs offer a versatile framework, representing an intermediate stage in the orientation process, making our findings a substantial generalization of previous results.

For a positive integer $r$, let $f(r)$ denote the smallest number such that any 2-edge connected mixed graph with radius $r$ has an oriented radius of at most $f(r)$. Recently, Babu, Benson, and Rajendraprasad significantly improved the upper bound of $f(r)$ by establishing that $f(r) \leq 1.5r^2 + r + 1$, see [Improved bounds for the oriented radius of mixed multigraphs, J. Graph Theory, 103 (2023), 674-689]. Additionally, they demonstrated that if each edge of a graph $G$ is contained within a cycle of length at most $η$, then the oriented radius of $G$ is at most $1.5rη$. The authors' results were derived through Observation 1, which served as the foundation for the development of Algorithm ORIENTOUT and Algorithm ORIENTIN. By integrating these algorithms, they obtained the improved bounds. However, an error has been identified in Observation 1, necessitating revisions to Algorithm ORIENTOUT and Algorithm ORIENTIN. In this note, we address the error and propose the necessary modifications to both algorithms, thereby ensuring the correctness of the conclusions.