arXiv++ Combinatorics

Given a graph $G=(V(G), E(G))$, the size of a minimum dominating set, minimum paired dominating set, and a minimum total dominating set of a graph $G$ are denoted by $γ(G)$, $γ_{\rm pr}(G)$, and $γ_{t}(G)$, respectively. For a positive integer $k$, a $k$-packing in $G$ is a set $S \subseteq V(G)$ such that for every pair of distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ in $S$, the distance between $u$ and $v$ is at least $k+1$. The $k$-packing number is the order of a largest $k$-packing and is denoted by $ρ_{k}(G)$. It is well known that $γ_{\rm pr}(G) \le 2γ(G)$. In this paper, we prove that it is NP-hard to determine whether $γ_{\rm pr}(G) = 2γ(G)$ even for bipartite graphs. We provide a simple characterization of trees with $γ_{\rm pr}(G) = 2γ(G)$, implying a polynomial-time recognition algorithm. We also prove that even for a bipartite graph, it is NP-hard to determine whether $γ_{\rm pr}(G)=γ_{t}(G)$. We finally prove that it is both NP-hard to determine whether $γ_{\rm pr}(G)=2ρ_{4}(G)$ and whether $γ_{\rm pr}(G)=2ρ_{3}(G)$.

The \emph{domination subdivision number} sd$(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (where an edge can be subdivided at most once) in order to increase the domination number of $G$. It has been shown \cite{vel} that sd$(T)\leq 3$ for any tree $T$. We prove that the decision problem of the domination subdivision number is NP-complete even for bipartite graphs. For this reason we define the \emph{domination multisubdivision number} of a nonempty graph $G$ as a minimum positive integer $k$ such that there exists an edge which must be subdivided $k$ times to increase the domination number of $G$. We show that msd$(G)\leq 3$ for any graph $G$. The domination subdivision number and the domination multisubdivision numer of a graph are incomparable in general case, but we show that for trees these two parameters are equal. We also determine domination multisubdivision number for some classes of graphs.