arXiv++ Combinatorics

In combinatorial optimization, ordinal costs can be used to model the quality of elements whenever numerical values are not available. When considering, for example, routing problems for cyclists, the safety of a street can be ranked in ordered categories like safe (separate bike lane), medium safe (street with a bike lane) and unsafe (street without a bike lane). However, ordinal optimization may suggest unrealistic solutions with huge detours to avoid unsafe street segments. In this paper, we investigate how partial preference information regarding the relative quality of the ordinal categories can be used to improve the relevance of the computed solutions. By introducing preference weights which describe how much better a category is at least or at most, compared to the subsequent category, we enlarge the ordinal dominance cone. This leads to a smaller set of alternatives, i. e., of ordinally efficient solutions. We show that the corresponding weighted ordinal ordering cone is a polyhedral cone and provide descriptions via its extreme rays and via its facets. The latter implies a linear transformation to an associated multi-objective optimization problem. This paves the way for the application of standard multi-objective solution approaches. We demonstrate the usefulness of the weighted ordinal ordering cone by investigating a safest path problem with different preference weights. Moreover, we investigate the interrelation between the weighted ordering cone to standard dominance concepts of multi-objective optimization, like, e.g., Pareto dominance, lexicographic dominance and weighted sum dominance.

We analyze combinatorial optimization problems with ordinal, i.e., non-additive, objective functions that assign categories (like good, medium and bad) rather than cost coefficients to the elements of feasible solutions. We review different optimality concepts for ordinal optimization problems and discuss their similarities and differences. We then focus on two prevalent optimality concepts that are shown to be equivalent. Our main result is a bijective linear transformation that transforms ordinal optimization problems to associated standard multi-objective optimization problems with binary cost coefficients. Since this transformation preserves all properties of the underlying problem, problem-specific solution methods remain applicable. A prominent example is dynamic programming and Bellman's principle of optimality, that can be applied, e.g., to ordinal shortest path and ordinal knapsack problems. We extend our results to multi-objective optimization problems that combine ordinal and real-valued objective functions.

Bi-objective optimization problems on matroids are in general intractable and their corresponding decision problems are in general NP-hard. However, if one of the objective functions is restricted to binary cost coefficients the problem becomes efficiently solvable by an exhaustive swap algorithm. Binary cost coefficients often represent two categories and are thus a special case of ordinal coefficients that are in general non-additive. In this paper we consider ordinal objective functions with more than two categories in the context of matroid optimization. We introduce several problem variants that can be distinguished w.r.t. their respective optimization goals, analyze their interrelations, and derive a polynomial time solution method that is based on the repeated solution of matroid intersection problems. Numerical tests on minimum spanning tree problems and on partition matroids confirm the efficiency of the approach.

Like most multiobjective combinatorial optimization problems, biobjective optimization problems on matroids are in general intractable and their corresponding decision problems are in general NP-hard. In this paper, we consider biobjective optimization problems on matroids where one of the objective functions is restricted to binary cost coefficients. We show that in this case the problem has a connected efficient set with respect to a natural definition of a neighborhood structure and hence, can be solved efficiently using a neighborhood search approach. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first non-trivial problem on matroids where connectedness of the efficient set can be established. The theoretical results are validated by numerical experiments with biobjective minimum spanning tree problems (graphic matroids) and with biobjective knapsack problems with a cardinality constraint (uniform matroids). In the context of the minimum spanning tree problem, coloring all edges with cost 0 green and all edges with cost 1 red leads to an equivalent problem where we want to simultaneously minimize one general objective and the number of red edges (which defines the second objective) in a Pareto sense.